Graphics card prices jump by up to 20% in China as shops stockpile Nvidia and AMD GPUs

midian182

Posts: 11,902   +182
Staff member
Ripple effect: Just when it seemed like graphics card prices couldn't get much worse, the memory crisis has delivered another unpleasant surprise. Nvidia and AMD GPU prices have surged in China, with some models rising by as much as 20% in a single week and premium cards now selling for almost 60% above their official MSRPs.

Distributor lists from MSI and Colorful reveal the increases. MSI raised the RTX 5080 Shadow 3X OC and Ventus from 9,999 yuan ($1,477) to 11,999 yuan ($1,773), a 20% jump in seven days. Its RTX 5070 Ti Shadow 3X OC rose 19.5%, while the RTX 5090D V2 increased 13%. What's worse is that these cards were already well above their suggested prices before the latest adjustment.

Comparing the new figures with Nvidia's Chinese MSRPs makes the situation look even worse. MSI's RTX 5070 Ti Gaming Trio OC is now 54% above the base MSRP, while the RTX 5080 Gaming Trio models are around 57% higher. Colorful's RTX 5080 Vulcan W OC is priced at 13,199 yuan ($1,949), 59% above MSRP, and its RTX 5070 Ti Vulcan W OC carries a similar 58.7% premium.

The increases aren't just limited to Nvidia. A market snapshot showed Radeon cards climbing across Chinese retailers, with some RX 9000 models seeing double-digit increases. AMD reportedly warned Asus, XFX, Sapphire, and other partners earlier this month that its GPU-and-memory bundles would become 10% more expensive.

The culprit is, of course, the continuing rise in GDDR6 and GDDR7 costs, combined with more expensive PCBs, coolers, and packaging. Nvidia supplies board partners with GPU and memory kits, so higher VRAM costs are passed directly to manufacturers. Reports claim the latest adjustment adds around 600 yuan ($89) to 8GB cards, 900 yuan ($133) to 12GB models, and 1,200 yuan ($177) to 16GB products.

Even older hardware is being dragged into the chaos. The RTX 3050 has reportedly climbed above $350 in China, while the ancient GT 1030 is approaching $100. Nvidia recently brought the RTX 3060 12GB back to stores at its original $329 MSRP, a move that illustrated just how distorted the GPU market has become.

Some distributors and smaller shops are reportedly stockpiling cards or temporarily removing them from sale, betting that they will fetch higher prices later, which could worsen shortages and accelerate retail price increases. Analysts have warned that RAM prices could rise another 40% to 50% during the third quarter, followed by a further 30% to 40% in Q4.

The figures currently apply to China – we don't know for certain that there will be identical increases elsewhere. However, distributor pricing changes often work their way through global supply chains, and there are rumors that worldwide increases of up to 40% are coming. For PC gamers who have been waiting for things to return to normal, the outlook is becoming increasingly grim, not better.

Permalink to story:

 
For reference local prices as of 7/28

If Nvidia wants to introduce the Blackwell Supers at a higher price what way to introduce them by making them look like a bargain compared to current flagship at 20 to 40% even higher prices.
1000071467.jpg1000071465.jpg
 
Last edited:
I thought these cards weren't even supposed to be available in China. Or is that only the the ones meant for servers?
 
Dayum picking up my 9070XT for $600 during the post Christmas lull was definitely one of my smarter component purchases.

And that's still more than I'd ever spent on a GPU in my 25+ years of building PCs.
 
There's a simple answer for this greedy BS. Don't buy ...
Despite your hyper-emotional response, you've taken the first baby steps towards understanding basic economics. When demand increases faster than supply, prices must rise to equalize the two. That removes people like yourself from the demand equation, while the more affluent or more highly motivated continue to buy.

In a free market, producers can set whatever prices they wish. But had they "greedily" raised prices when demand was low, they would have depressed sales below supply, and actually lowered their profits.
 
Despite your hyper-emotional response, you've taken the first baby steps towards understanding basic economics. When demand increases faster than supply, prices must rise to equalize the two. That removes people like yourself from the demand equation, while the more affluent or more highly motivated continue to buy.

In a free market, producers can set whatever prices they wish. But had they "greedily" raised prices when demand was low, they would have depressed sales below supply, and actually lowered their profits.
Any supposedly "hyper-emotional response" is preferable to a "I still live in my grandmother's cellar, and use AI to create all my correspondence, because all the big boys used to hit me when I was at school" type of response....ooops!
 
Any supposedly "hyper-emotional response" is preferable to a "I still live in my grandmother's cellar, and use AI to create all my correspondence
It's a lamentable commentary on the youth of today that they view proper grammar and an expansive vocabulary as evidence of "AI assistance". I learned English as a second language; and from teachers who didn't give cookies and gold stars for participation. Now, you may safe return to your game of Counterstrike.
 
Despite your hyper-emotional response, you've taken the first baby steps towards understanding basic economics. When demand increases faster than supply, prices must rise to equalize the two. That removes people like yourself from the demand equation, while the more affluent or more highly motivated continue to buy.

In a free market, producers can set whatever prices they wish. But had they "greedily" raised prices when demand was low, they would have depressed sales below supply, and actually lowered their profits.
"Endymio said:----> Despite your hyper-emotional response, you've taken the first baby steps towards understanding basic economics." Why do some of the people in this forum find it necessary to "insult" others for their views, or opinions??? I've seen it often enough, but until now I never received one. Everything after your insulting comment, was fine, and I'm sure it was informative for some. I'm 68 yrs old. Have you ever heard the expression, vote with your wallet, it still applies, especially today with the greed many of these companies hoist upon consumers? In the future Endymio, you might keep the insults to yourself. And please don't make the mistake of taking my kindness in response to your insult, as weakness. To the contrary...
 
Last edited:
"Endymio said:----> Despite your hyper-emotional response, you've taken the first baby steps towards understanding basic economics." Why do some of the people in this forum find it necessary to "insult" others for their views, or opinions??? I've seen it often enough, but until now I never received one. Everything after your insulting comment, was fine, and I'm sure it was informative for some. I'm 68 yrs old. Have you ever heard the expression, vote with your wallet? In the future Endymio, you might keep the insults to yourself. And please don't make the mistake of taking my kindness in response to your insult, as weakness. To the contrary...
It seems I touched a nerve. Stating facts is not the same as flinging insults. Your initial post (and this one as well) was highly emotional, and "baby steps" can be taken by those who aren't babies. Your framing of the situation belies a deep misunderstanding of one of the most elementary principles of economics. Instead of lashing out, why not either accept what I said, or attempt to counter it with at least a vestige of a logical argument?
 
Despite your hyper-emotional response, you've taken the first baby steps towards understanding basic economics. When demand increases faster than supply, prices must rise to equalize the two. That removes people like yourself from the demand equation, while the more affluent or more highly motivated continue to buy.

In a free market, producers can set whatever prices they wish. But had they "greedily" raised prices when demand was low, they would have depressed sales below supply, and actually lowered their profits.

Can you be any more pretentious and condescending? I don't see what the point of speaking to someone you don't know like this, and he made a statement, and it wasn't emotional at all, never mind being hyper-emotional. You sound and write like an arrogant pseudo-intellectual, not someone that actually knows what they're talking about beyond just regurgitating talking points you heard somewhere before. You state that you're "stating facts" by being a douche when he stated "There's a simple answer for this greedy BS. Don't buy ..." was as much of a statement than anything you typed. People like you are why this world is a clown world with too much annoyance and drama.
 
Can you be any more pretentious and condescending?
I don't know, but I'm willing to try. Meanwhile, I'll clue you in on something important: the nice thing about facts is that they don't change depending on how they're expressed, or who expresses them. Why not try debating an actual fact?

he made a statement, and it wasn't emotional at all, never mind being hyper-emotional.
You've just made the same mistake as him. In a free market, when demand exceeds supply, prices must rise. Categorizing that simple fact as "greedy BS" is an emotional response .. and a very dangerous one. When people fail to understand basic economics, they fall for rhetoric of populist politicians, who enact laws and regulations that cause real harm -- to us consumers.

People like you are why this world is a clown world with too much annoyance and drama.
I'd argue that people like you, who use their amygdala in place of their prefrontal cortex, are the root cause of much of the world's problems.
 
Last edited:
It seems I touched a nerve. Stating facts is not the same as flinging insults. Your initial post (and this one as well) was highly emotional, and "baby steps" can be taken by those who aren't babies. Your framing of the situation belies a deep misunderstanding of one of the most elementary principles of economics. Instead of lashing out, why not either accept what I said, or attempt to counter it with at least a vestige of a logical argument?
Lashing out?? Hey check this out arsehole. I live at 1142 Sheridan Way in Stockton, Ca. Why don't you and your smart mouth come up here, or down here and we'll see just how tough you are? It's just me and this three bedroom house, I'm divorced, (I have girlfriend but she doesn't live with me) the kids are long grown and gone. You're NOT a tough guy, you're a coward behind a keyboard who just doubled down. I'm 68 yrs old, and I'll F you up, boy!
 
Lashing out?? Hey check this out arsehole. I live at 1142 Sheridan Way in Stockton, Ca. Why don't you and your smart mouth come up here, or down here and we'll see just how tough you are? It's just me and this three bedroom house, I'm divorced, (I have girlfriend but she doesn't live with me) the kids are long grown and gone. You're NOT a tough guy, you're a coward behind a keyboard who just doubled down. I'm 68 yrs old, and I'll F you up, boy!

Home of the slap kings, the Diaz brothers!
 
Back