Here's what Microsoft charges the FBI to access customer data

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,291   +192
Staff member

hacked microsoft fbi email hacker

A collection of e-mails and invoices obtained by the Syrian Electronic Army claims to show how much Microsoft charges a secret division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to legally collect and view information about its customers.

The Daily Dot was recently granted access to the documents which outline months of dealings between the Redmond-based company’s Global Criminal Compliance team and the FBI’s Digital Intercept Technology Unit (DITU). According to the publication’s write-up, Microsoft charges between $50 and $200 per request.

That may not sound like much but it certainly adds up pretty quick. For example, an invoice dated November 2013 totaled $281,000. Assuming the cheapest and most expensive fees, that’s anywhere between 1,405 and 5,620 requests.

hacked microsoft fbi email hacker

Unsurprisingly, neither the FBI nor Microsoft would confirm the validity of the documents although a specialist told the publication that there was no indication that the documents weren’t legit.

Microsoft did say that regarding law enforcement requests, there’s nothing unusual here as under US law, companies can request reimbursement for costs associated with complying with valid legal orders for customer data. The Microsoft spokesperson said they attempt to recover some of the costs associated with any such orders.

True enough, the fact that such activity takes place isn’t anything we didn’t already know about. If nothing else, however, the leaks reveal just how often the government pings big companies like Microsoft regarding customer data.

Permalink to story.

 
This is how your privacy takes up a big one.

But on another hand, if MS didn't hand it out, they would subpoena MS instead, which would turn into a nightmare for the company - 5,620 subpoenas a month :)

Evil begets evil :)
 
"there’s nothing unusual here as under US law, companies can request reimbursement for costs associated with complying with valid legal orders"

That's the key everyone skips over. The FBI can only get data (legally, and only legally obtained evidence can be used in trial) if they have a valid order from a judge. If judges are just handing these things out willy-nilly without evidence that someone is suspect then that's a judiciary problem. The article attempts to paint MS as a "bad guy", image and all, but they are just doing what is legally required of them. This is no different from a cop showing up at your door with a warrant - you have to let them search anything listed in the warrant. If you have a problem with the warrant, then you have to take it up with the judge that signed it which often can't be done at the time the cop is standing at your door.
 
So, basically, one could establish a free email or chat company, and live off the revenue generated by opening private info to secret services and investigation agencies. I mean, 3mln per year is not a bad income!
 
This is a small example of how your tax dollars are being wastefully spent!

Actually, catching bad guys is one of the few ways I'd say my tax dollars aren't being wasted. If you mean it'd be nice if it were cheaper, that's true. You'd like to think that MS would be interested in helping authorities whenever they could. It's not like they need the cost to be a deterrent to making a ton of requests because they need a warrant to get the data. The process of getting a warrant would keep the number of requests from getting too high.

I understand MS has a right to be compensated for the time they take in fulfilling these requests, but it seems like a lot of money. I'd bet the process is pretty streamlined and it's not much work for them.
 
CALLED IT, they should pay me for using their os. It's not like microsoft had a choice though if they said no then the DHS would arrest the owners for some sort of ridiculous charge and then make the company do so anyway.
 
So, basically, one could establish a free email or chat company, and live off the revenue generated by opening private info to secret services and investigation agencies. I mean, 3mln per year is not a bad income!
Hmmm, interesting idea... on a completely different note I think I might be setting up a email service, you know just to try it out :)
 
I take this as proof as to why Google is implementing security, they want to sell the data not have the NSA/FBI take it.
 
Back