true, even tho when you use virtualbox n stuff like that u can feel the difference between 2 and 4 cores1, 2, 4 cores - I've notice that some faster 2 cores are better than some 4 cores. 4 cores next gen are not as fast as prior 4 cores.
I always find it funny how people can rationalize not needing an upgrade, if their over-clock will match a specific factory-clock CPU. The rationalization should be by how well the CPU performance suits your needs, not by some benchmark.I just did a LGA 771 to LGA 775 mod to a Xeon E5450 quad ($39+6 for the mod tape.) I had it clocked to 4.25 GHz with 1.4v. It scores close to a i5 4430 in the few benchmarks I've ran.
Man, I would love to see that with a RAID setup and batch transcoding audio with dBpoweramp. It does 1 song per core.12 cores 24 threads. 2x Xeon L5639 overclocked to 3GHz on an EVGA-SR2. Can definitely recommend if using stuff like handbrake or using virtual machines. 2nd machine is a Xeon W3580, overclocked to 4.0GHz. Both machines seem to benchmark about the same. The difference is when using something like video encoders (that support multicore) or multiple VMs. Doesn't seem to make much difference on games.
It has got RAID, an LSI MegaRAID SAS 9240-8i. So, 2 onboard Mavell 6GB (rubbish), 6 onboard 3GB, and 8x 6GB via the MegaRaid (boots from 250GB SSD on this, much faster than the Marvell), so it supports 16 drives in total. I also installed optical in and out on the onboard SPDIF and a PCIe 1394 (firewire) card for use with directors cut. I use 3 monitors on it with an XFX 6870. The sound output is via my Yamaha natural sound AV amp DSP-A5.Man, I would love to see that with a RAID setup and batch transcoding audio with dBpoweramp. It does 1 song per core.
If your current profile is correct that is still a 4 core processor - it just has hyperthreading which allows it to run 8 threads.