Rocket Lake is finally here and today we're checking out the new Core i5-11600K to see if it's a worthy replacement for the affordable 10600K and/or defeating the overpriced Ryzen 5 5600X.
Rocket Lake is finally here and today we're checking out the new Core i5-11600K to see if it's a worthy replacement for the affordable 10600K and/or defeating the overpriced Ryzen 5 5600X.
Woah, better contain that edge there bud. I suppose you’d rather pay amd $700 for that 6core? Youngins don’t remember this, but amd once sold $1000 single core processors that were single diver percentages faster. Shocking I know.Look at how miraculous, Intel can now offer such a CPU for that price.
They are only doing this now because AMD is kicking their arrogant and corrupt @sses.
If not, that CPU would easily cost us over US$700!
That's why I refuse to give them money and hope that they die.
I agree with the closing remark, just get a 10600k. Realistically nobody is going to pair this with a 3090 or even 3080.
Woah, better contain that edge there bud. I suppose you’d rather pay amd $700 for that 6core? Youngins don’t remember this, but amd once sold $1000 single core processors that were single diver percentages faster. Shocking I know.
So let's say you have the same setups as Steve is using in the testing, and you run the same power test all the time. The difference between the two systems is 64 watts, so a full day of non-stop Blender benchmarking equates to 1.536 kWh. The average US cost per kWh of electricity is $0.1269 and with the current difference in CPU prices being around $95, that would take 487.4 days of non-stop Blender benchmarking to cover that amount.The different in cost will be made up rather easily in the cost to run the Intel over the AMD, no thanks I would take the AMD 5600X.
So let's say you have the same setups as Steve is using in the testing, and you run the same power test all the time. The difference between the two systems is 64 watts, so a full day of non-stop Blender benchmarking equates to 1.536 kWh. The average US cost per kWh of electricity is $0.1269 and with the current difference in CPU prices being around $95, that would take 487.4 days of non-stop Blender benchmarking to cover that amount.
While there's obviously considerable variance in kWh cost by state, how many people are going to be purchasing a Ryzen 5 5600X with the sole purpose of benchmarking Blender 24/7 or any high power consumption operation continuously for day after day?
Increasing the core count of a CPU by 33% doesn't automatically result in the entire PC using 33% more power under a heavy load. A lot depends on what PL2 setting the motherboard manufacturer has gone with - in the case of the 11700K and 11900K it could be considerably higher than the 11600K's. This was very much the case in Anandtech's testing, where the 11600K peaked at 150W (CPU package value) in a full AVX2 workout and the 11900K reached 241W in the same test.My conclusion: If we extrapolated the power consumption of this 6 core part (221watts) in blender open data and at the same frequency as your power consumption graph shows, to a Rocket Lake 8 core part, we'd get roughly 294 watts and yet consuming more power than an 8 core Ryzen 5800X (217 watts), is already unimpressive.
You mean the original Athlon 950 Mhz / 1 Ghz ? If I remember correctly, the 1 Ghz Pentium III from Intel cost $990. Not sure how much they charged for their 1.13 Ghz model but since that one had to be recalled it does not matter.I agree with the closing remark, just get a 10600k. Realistically nobody is going to pair this with a 3090 or even 3080.
Woah, better contain that edge there bud. I suppose you’d rather pay amd $700 for that 6core? Youngins don’t remember this, but amd once sold $1000 single core processors that were single diver percentages faster. Shocking I know.
I'm going to be honest, reading people's posts online, it looks like that is what 99% of the posters do!how many people are going to be purchasing a Ryzen 5 5600X with the sole purpose of benchmarking Blender 24/7
The Athlon 1.1 ghz was launched at 719 US$, it's was almost $250 cheaper than the best offer for a Pentium III 1 GHz at US$ 962.You mean the original Athlon 950 Mhz / 1 Ghz ? If I remember correctly, the 1 Ghz Pentium III from Intel cost $990. Not sure how much they charged for their 1.13 Ghz model but since that one had to be recalled it does not matter.
Indeed it was!Wasn‘t that around the time that Intel heavily engaged in anti competitive practices that they were fined for in several countries ?
Some do because they need to worship brands/corporations and will gladly and conveniently ignore the BS done by those companies.Some of us old ones might not remember this....because...reasons.
I agree with the closing remark, just get a 10600k. Realistically nobody is going to pair this with a 3090 or even 3080.
Woah, better contain that edge there bud. I suppose you’d rather pay amd $700 for that 6core? Youngins don’t remember this, but amd once sold $1000 single core processors that were single diver percentages faster. Shocking I know.
Because overclocking Ryzen is a complete waste of time?As an amateur in this area, I ask why would I not just get a 5600 and a Gigabyte A520 AORUS Elite for $80, overclock the hell out of the 5600 and call it a day?
Because overclocking Ryzen is a complete waste of time?