Intel details mobile Atom 'Merrifield' and 'Moorefield' SoCs

Scorpus

Posts: 2,162   +239
Staff member

It's not just Qualcomm detailing their latest efforts in the mobile SoC space today: Intel has also taken the time to talk about their new chips, 'Merrifield' and 'Moorefield', as well as their latest LTE modem. Intel isn't targeting the high-end with their new SoCs, instead looking to tackle the mid-range with silicon they're claiming is as powerful as some top ARM SoCs.

Merrifield is Intel's SoC for the first half of the year, packed with a dual-core 'Silvermont' CPU sharing 1 MB of L2 cache and a PowerVR G6400 GPU clocked at 533 MHz. There will be two Merrifield SoCs, the Atom Z3460 and Z3480, with a max CPU clock of 1.60 GHz and 2.13 GHz respectively.

Moorefield will be coming in the second half of 2014, and packs four Silvermont cores also sharing 1 MB of L2 cache, plus a beefier PowerVR G6430 GPU at 533 MHz. Again, Intel will push out two Moorefield chips, with max CPU clocks of 1.80 GHz and 2.33 GHz for the Atom Z3560 and Z3580 respectively.

Merrifield and Moorefield are very similar in other aspects too. Both SoCs are built on a 22nm process, are 64-bit capable, and support up to 4 GB of LPDDR3 at 533 MHz, 256 GB of internal storage, 13-megapixel rear cameras, 1080p60 video recording, and low-power sensor data monitoring. The chips currently support Android 4.4.2, and Intel says they will also support the upcoming L-release.

If priced correctly, Intel's new mobile SoCs will be quite competitive, especially if you go by Intel's included performance data. They claim the Merrifield Z3480 is faster than the Apple A7 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 in web applications, and close when it comes to OpenGL gaming. Intel also expects to be a leader when it comes to battery life and energy efficiency.

As well as Merrifield and Moorefield, Intel announced their second-generation multi-mode LTE modem, known as the XMM 7260. The modem supports Category 6 LTE (300 Mbps) and carrier aggregation, plus up to 22 simultaneous bands. With the XMM 7260, Intel hopes to be the number two player in the LTE space (behind Qualcomm) in 2014.

Towards the end of the year we can also look forward to Cherry Trail, the SoC successor to Bay Trail that we've seen in many Windows tablets as of late. SoFIA will also be coming in late 2014 as Intel's entry-level SoC with Silvermont cores.

Permalink to story.

 
I don't understand this part
mid-range with silicon...as powerful as some top ARM SoCs.
a mid-range solution which competes with a high-end product?
(in my non-technical mind, the intel product is a high-end one)
 
Last edited:
I don't understand this part
mid-range with silicon...as powerful as some top ARM SoCs.
a mid-range solution which competes with a high-end product?
(in my non-technical mind, the intel product is a high-end one)

There Mid-range in the intel product line up with Bay trail systems still being the High end product from Intel. The atom 3740 already matches(and beats in some areas) the snapdragon 800 and tegra 4 on the CPU side of the Soc and Intel offers a pretty powerful graphics solution (the Apple A7 beats the atoms, SD 800, and tegra 4 graphics wise though). The intel atom 3770 series are the most powerful mobile soc atm (CPU wise, and less then 10w tdp). These new chips are going to have a different graphics architecture then baytrail as well, baytrail uses intels own graphics architecture with these chips going back to powerVR based solution. r graphics then baytrail but Chery trail should close the gap and give the top soc the best graphics again.
 
I don't understand this part
mid-range with silicon...as powerful as some top ARM SoCs.
a mid-range solution which competes with a high-end product?
(in my non-technical mind, the intel product is a high-end one)

They're targeting mid-range devices, both in marketing and price points, I believe
 
Back