Intel turns to Apple for potential investment as it looks to rebuild chip business

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,010   +58
Staff
Rumor mill: It appears Intel may be looking to ease its financial hardships by partnering with a rival – Apple. While unconfirmed, such a deal would mark a striking reversal just two years after Apple completed its transition away from Intel chips and released the last macOS version to support Intel-based devices.

Intel has reportedly held early talks with Apple about a possible investment. The struggling chipmaker is seeking to stabilize its business with new backers following recent partnerships with other rivals and overseas investors. Anonymous sources told Bloomberg that the discussions remain preliminary and may not result in a deal.

Intel approached Apple after Nvidia committed to a $5 billion investment to collaborate on semiconductors for data centers and personal computers. SoftBank also offered a $2 billion cash infusion in August. The sources claim Intel has contacted several other companies in search of similar arrangements.

Intel has been under pressure to restore its standing in the chip industry after years of losing ground to competitors. Once the world's dominant processor maker, the Santa Clara-based company has struggled to keep pace with Nvidia, now the market leader in artificial intelligence hardware, and AMD, which has steadily gained share in servers and personal computers.

A potential deal with Apple would carry symbolic weight, though it seems unlikely the iPhone maker would reverse its decision to transition away from Intel processors in Macs. Apple designs its own chips, manufactured by TSMC, and has not indicated any plans to return to Intel architecture.

Intel's latest efforts are unfolding with financial and political backing from Washington. In August, the Trump administration brokered an unusual deal granting the US government a 10-percent stake in the company, framing Intel as essential to rebuilding domestic semiconductor production capacity.

Recently installed CEO Lip-Bu Tan has set out to restore investor confidence while managing Intel's ongoing foundry push. The company initially announced plans to manufacture chips for third parties under former CEO Pat Gelsinger. However, it has struggled to sign enough customers to support its ambitious factory expansion program. In July, Tan said Intel would launch its planned 14A production process only if customers committed to using it.

Apple and Intel have a long history, marked at times by both cooperation and strain. Apple adopted Intel processors in its Macs in 2006 but began shifting to its own chips in 2020, part of a broader effort to bring more semiconductor design in-house. In 2019, Apple also purchased most of Intel's smartphone modem business.

At the same time, Apple has positioned itself as a supporter of US manufacturing. In August, the company raised its domestic investment commitment to $600 billion over four years, up from an earlier $500 billion pledge. At a White House event, Apple announced that the program includes a $2.5 billion commitment to Corning, its longtime glass supplier.

Apple Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook, in a recent CNBC interview, declined to comment directly on Intel but said he hoped to see more competition in the chip foundry business.

"We'd love to see Intel come back," Cook said.

Permalink to story:

 
I started dumping A LOT of money into intel as soon as Pat left. As someone who is heavily invested in Intel, I'm not confident in Tan's abilities. For awhile he looked like he was going to sell off their assets much like private equity would do. I was confident in Intel's talent being able to make a comback, but Tan has rid Intel of their long-term talent. Tan has done more damage to Intel than Pat did. Pat was a foolish business man, Tan is just an incompetent fool. I doubt Apple will do business with Intel as long as TSMC can produce a better product than Intel. I bet Apple wishes for Intel success, but they aren't going to do business with them.
 
Last edited:
I hope intel fails to recover to the same level they were before. They really are a $hit company and engaged in many anti-competitive practices in the past 25 years. They only got a slap on the wrist everytime. NVIDIA is even worse. Its like the thugs are rescuing each other.
The Nvidia deal will force Laptop makers to use Nvidia GPU and Intel cpu forcing AMD out of Laptop market.
I hope Apple refuses to invest in Intel as Apple got nothing to gain from it.
 
"Listen *****s, I've already burned tens of billions in my fabs and I've gotten nowhere. Now, give me yours so I can keep burning some more... This time it's different!!!"
 
I hope intel fails to recover to the same level they were before. They really are a $hit company and engaged in many anti-competitive practices in the past 25 years. They only got a slap on the wrist everytime. NVIDIA is even worse. Its like the thugs are rescuing each other.
The Nvidia deal will force Laptop makers to use Nvidia GPU and Intel cpu forcing AMD out of Laptop market.
I hope Apple refuses to invest in Intel as Apple got nothing to gain from it.
once they got rid of all their talent they definitely did become a **** company. I had no desire to see Intel fail because they had lots of talented individuals who deserved jobs. Intel(Tan) got rid of the people who made them successful so what in the world am I holding out for?
 
I perceive Intel's current plight as the fabled 'The Tortoise and The Hare'. To me, Intel seemed to be overly-cocky/confident with their roadmap until around 2015 - then they stagnated. Before that, they were nearly always notably ahead of AMD ... until they weren't. For decades I read constantly of Intel's benchmarks outdoing AMDs and AMD being only a tiny fraction of the desktop/workstation/server market. But now in 2025 Intel sucks, Intel lags, and AMD is utterly destroying Intel in performance and selection; the table has completely turned. I'm lovin' my dual EPYC 9654s which I use to check my email twice daily ;o)
 
I hope intel fails to recover to the same level they were before. They really are a $hit company and engaged in many anti-competitive practices in the past 25 years. They only got a slap on the wrist everytime. NVIDIA is even worse. Its like the thugs are rescuing each other.
The Nvidia deal will force Laptop makers to use Nvidia GPU and Intel cpu forcing AMD out of Laptop market.
I hope Apple refuses to invest in Intel as Apple got nothing to gain from it.
Laptop makers are not forced to choose intel, they can make AMD based laptops, or ARM based laptops, if they wish. The alarmism undermines whatever point you are trying to make.
once they got rid of all their talent they definitely did become a **** company. I had no desire to see Intel fail because they had lots of talented individuals who deserved jobs. Intel(Tan) got rid of the people who made them successful so what in the world am I holding out for?
Most of the good talent has already left, that's why intel is where it is. Anyone with talent and ideas long ago was stifled by Intel's bureaucracy and left for qualcomm, AMD, apple, ece.
 
I had two stints at Intel; one at the Beaverton campus, the other at Hillsboro campus. While this dates me a bit, it was during the P4 days. AMD was beating the pants off Intel with their XP line and Intel could simply not get anywhere with their terrible NetBurst arch.

Everyone there was hopelessly brain washed that Intel wasn't being beaten in arch, or perhaps too scared to speak up. To even put forth that idea would get you a "re-education" from your manager, that Intel wasn't currently leading.

I'm not saying things didn't change, but from the years after, it didn't get any better. I'm not surprised where they ended up. You can't plug your ears and hum a tune and things will magically get better. I have my doubts about Tan. But it would be foolish to wish their demise; but it is somewhat poetic to see where this line of thinking got them.
 
Laptop makers are not forced to choose intel, they can make AMD based laptops, or ARM based laptops, if they wish. The alarmism undermines whatever point you are trying to make.
Most of the good talent has already left, that's why intel is where it is. Anyone with talent and ideas long ago was stifled by Intel's bureaucracy and left for qualcomm, AMD, apple, ece.
I suggest you watch Gamers Nexus investigation into the Nvidia/Intel deal. It covers every details of the deal and its possible consequences in manupulating laptop sales.
 
I suggest you watch Gamers Nexus investigation into the Nvidia/Intel deal. It covers every details of the deal and its possible consequences in manupulating laptop sales.
This exactly. Intel has a history of exclusive deals with OEM's to not use products from the competition, likely not as bad as back in the P4 days but I have no doubt Intel still gives companies discounts to flood the market with Intel laptops & OEM systems.
A collaboration with Nvidia doesn't mean anything good for the consumer, it's a anti-competitive duopoly between two monopolistic companies, and Jensen Huang has even said he wants the laptop and SoC market that AMD has been doing well in. In the long term I would expect Nvidia to keep providing investments and possibly bribe their way into getting an x86 license or buying control over Intel's fabs.

Tan has fired what talented engineers have left, I have no confidence they'll turn things around enough to be competitive without playing dirt tricks. It is clear how desperate Intel is when they're getting govt intervention and begging for Apple to use their fabs. Nvidia doesn't want to use Intel fabs, I don't see why Apple would want to either as Nvidia and Apple want the latest nodes for their products, not the crappy node from Intel with low yield rates.
 
I peg this as another Trump "suggestion" where Apple is obliged to put some money in the kitty or "regret it."
 
Back