Well that was a bit more like it!
That's just the sort of stuff that I expected to see in the second film (and was disappointed that I didn't.)
I don't expect any oscar winning acting, but its obviously going to be action packed, and looks like a nice end to the trilogy.
I do get the feeling that the 2nd movie's function must be to set the stage for the 3rd, and nothing more. Consider the closeness of their release dates, and the back to back nature of their production - its almost like they "elected" to do a "trilogy" even although there was clearly only 1 true sequel, that being Revolutions. Even from an initial viewing of this trailer, its apparent that 2nd movie was a precursor to the 3rd, and nothing more.
What might have been nicer was an epic-lengthed 2nd film, as the only sequel to film 1, about 3 hours or so long. Indeed, this may have initially been the intention of the producers, directors, writers, etc, but its not always possible to do what you like with sequels to big, successful, expensive movies - you are often at the mercy of accountants and the wishes of movie companies first and foremost.
All in all, I am excited. I think that this looks great. However, I was also quite excited by the trailer for movie 2, so lets wait till I actually go to the cinema and see movie 3 before I cast judgment.
