Meta is using its own employees' activity to train AI, and laying off 8,000 of them at the same time

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,010   +58
Staff
A hot potato: Meta is expanding how it monitors employee computer use as part of its push to improve artificial intelligence systems, a move that is drawing internal resistance. In an update shared with US employees and reviewed by The New York Times, Meta said it will begin collecting detailed data on how workers use their computers. That includes what they type, how they move their mouse, where they click, and what appears on their screens.

Meta said the data will help its AI systems learn how people complete everyday tasks on a computer.

The reaction inside Meta was immediate and, in many cases, negative. Employees raised concerns in internal forums, questioning both the scope of the tracking and the lack of an opt-out option. "This makes me super uncomfortable," one engineering manager wrote. "How do we opt out?"

Andrew Bosworth, Meta's chief technology officer, replied. "There is no option to opt out on your corporate laptop." The response drew a wave of reactions, including more than 100 emojis expressing frustration and surprise.

Meta says the data collection is narrowly focused. "There are safeguards in place to protect sensitive content, and the data is not used for any other purpose," said spokesman Tracy Clayton. Bosworth also addressed concerns about security in internal discussions, writing, "This data is very tightly controlled. This will not be a leak risk."

The tracking effort comes as Meta restructures much of its work around AI. Since the release of ChatGPT in 2022, Meta has been investing heavily in AI models, infrastructure, and research, including a push toward what Mark Zuckerberg has described as "superintelligence." Those changes are now showing up in daily workflows. Employees are expected to use AI tools more regularly, and in some cases, their usage is being measured.

Internally, Meta has introduced dashboards that track how many tokens employees use – a metric tied to AI processing. Several employees said the dashboards have turned usage into a form of competition. Some have begun building large numbers of AI agents to automate tasks, while others have built tools to manage or evaluate those agents. In some cases, this has led to layers of automation – agents reviewing other agents – as usage increases.

At the same time, the company is cutting jobs. Meta said it plans to lay off about 10% of its workforce, roughly 8,000 employees, with cuts expected to take place in May. In an internal message, Janelle Gale, the company's head of human resources, said the reductions would help "offset the other investments we're making." She added: "I know this leaves everyone with nearly a month of ambiguity, which is incredibly unsettling."

The overlap between layoffs and increased reliance on AI has added to the tension. Some employees have questioned whether they are helping build systems that could eventually replace parts of their own roles. "It's incredibly demoralizing," one employee wrote. Others have started looking for new jobs or trying to position themselves to receive severance.

Similar tensions are emerging across the tech industry. Companies including Microsoft, Block, and Coinbase have all announced layoffs or buyouts as AI tools begin to change how work is done, particularly in software development. Tools that can generate code are reducing the amount of manual work required, which in turn is reshaping how teams are structured.

"There is no playbook for AI in the workplace yet," Leo Boussioux, a professor of information systems at the University of Washington, told The New York Times. "AI can potentially make everyone a better coder and help them do way more things with fewer resources, but as a result, it also brings more intensity to the daily life of the worker."

Meta executives have pushed back on the idea that the company is using the new tracking systems for employee surveillance. During a company-wide meeting, Zuckerberg said the data collection is not intended for "surveillance or performance tracking or anything like that," but instead to help train AI systems on "how smart people use computers to accomplish tasks."

"I think we know that AI is one of the most competitive fields, probably in history," he said.

Even at the leadership level, there is some uncertainty about where the changes will lead. "We don't really know what the optimal size of the company will be in the future," said Chief Financial Officer Susan Li during a recent investor call. "I think there's a lot of change right now, with AI capabilities advancing rapidly."

Permalink to story:

 
In a world littered with some truly terrible companies and horrific human beings. Meta and Zuckerberg still mange to lead the pack. I can't understand how they still make so much money? Facebook and Instagram are atrocious now. AI slop and bots have turned them into a unusable sea of sh1t. People need to leave and go to other less toxic Social Networks (if they must). I can't think of many things in life that would give me more joy than seeing Zuckerberg's cancerous empire topple. (Maybe Donald Trump shitting himself live on stage).
 
In a world littered with some truly terrible companies and horrific human beings. Meta and Zuckerberg still mange to lead the pack. I can't understand how they still make so much money? Facebook and Instagram are atrocious now. AI slop and bots have turned them into a unusable sea of sh1t. People need to leave and go to other less toxic Social Networks (if they must). I can't think of many things in life that would give me more joy than seeing Zuckerberg's cancerous empire topple. (Maybe Donald Trump shitting himself live on stage).
They continue to make money because ads work and there is little competition to go elsewhere.

I blame boomers that never learned how to use the real internet and people too cheap to pay a few dollars to run their own website. All those mandatory groups for school or sports or hobbies or small business sites that it's difficult to avoid (but their "free" or people won't switch when you push back).
 
One more ridiculous attempt to spread AI hysteria.

What employees Meta could possibly use to train AI? Microsoft's? Amazon's?
Obviously, Meta can only use their own employees. Why Meta doing the only possible thing is presented as something important?

Laying off people has absolutely nothing to do with the above - Meta hyper-over-hired during Covid, and recently scrapped the Metaverse project.
 
But according to A.I apologists on this website they say that people losing their jobs is just a "generational event, just like when the doorman at hotels were laid off"....

Yep, people on here have compared dead-end doorman jobs to thousands of professionals that so far have lost their jobs to A.I
 
Meta doing the exact thing they said they were going to do, and plenty of other companies are doing as well, having employees training AI to only get fired and replaced by AI.
Unsurprisingly the AI apologists high on the AI koolaid still think this is due to too many employees hired over 5 years ago, but that isn't the case since these are high level IT jobs.
 
They continue to make money because ads work and there is little competition to go elsewhere.

I blame boomers that never learned how to use the real internet and people too cheap to pay a few dollars to run their own website. All those mandatory groups for school or sports or hobbies or small business sites that it's difficult to avoid (but their "free" or people won't switch when you push back).

You blame boomers. People aren't very smart in general. Which is not nice to say but also not many people have the money it takes to change the world.
The irony as I see it is, the only way to stop capitalism and the corruption that comes with it, is to have enough money to buy the position.
But those who wish to make the world better soon realise they can't and are absorbed into the failed system either as a slave to it or as one who just tells them, it's all working as planned don't worry.

Ads as you mentioned, advertising jobs are the most fkn pointless in the planet.
You shouldn't be paid to push your crap into people. Your product should be good enough to sell itself. And have celebrity endorsements to help sell which said pay cheque will be passed down to the consumers.

You don't need a job or a career. You need a purpose. Unfortunately the system as **** as it is , is designed to work around money. People mock games and apps for having a paywall. So does everything in every day life.
 
I did read something about hiring developers to build and train an AI based moderation, once that was completed both camps (devs + moderators) where sacked. This is no different. I just don't get it why people keep using these products, businesses keep spending on meta's stuff, there has to be a proper way out of the box here.
 
The crapcoders are fired in big numbers these days. AI already easily does it better. The world need good coders, sadly 75% of them are bad and this is why most applications and games are poorly optimized these days.
 
As one out of work in 2026 because of AI, and waiting for responses from job applications, I feel their pain; it was, indeed, very demoralising. However, I have come to terms with it and saw the positive of getting into another field. One's peace of mind is priceless.
 
Meta moderation has been broken for as long as I remember. Now they teach it to AI… I guess no one will notice
 
The irony as I see it is, the only way to stop capitalism and the corruption that comes with it, is to have enough money to buy the position.
It only seems ironic with poor definitions.

Free market capitalism is not the cause of the corruption.

The corruption is caused by those that don't want to compete in free markets. Buying politicians is cheaper and easier than competing fairly with the best products.

1. Convince people business is unfair. 2. People give government power to fix industries. 3. Biggest businesses at that moment buy government to win unfairly. 4. People give government more power to fix industries. 5. Businesses winning through government corruption win more. 6. People give government more power to fix industries... and on and on.

This socialized corruption of free markets is commonly called Crony-Capitalism. Yet everyone everyone crying foul against it's effects a) call it just capitalism and b) think more government power will fix it rather than make it worse.
 
I don't believe Meta has 8,000 employees. What do they do? Facebook is a single website and had bugs, although they fixed those. Some of these silicon valley figures are lies, like their incomes.
 
Back