Meta maintains a secret "do-not-rehire" list for ex-employees

midian182

Posts: 11,718   +177
Staff member
In a nutshell: Meta reportedly keeps a secret list of former employees who, for unknown reasons, the company will not rehire. Even if an ex-member of staff was a top performer during their stint at Meta, being on the list means they won't be returning in any capacity.

Meta has laid off more employees than most since 2020 – an estimated 35,600. Business Insider reports that one of these was an engineer who lost their job after four years at the firm despite being repeatedly praised by his managers and told their work was "crucial." They were also informed that the layoff was a business decision, and that multiple managers wanted them back at the company and on their teams.

However, applying to twenty positions at Meta within a year of being laid off yielded no success for the ex-employee. Hiring managers expressed interest in bringing them back and set up a hiring calls with recruiters, but the recruiters would then ghost them.

After inquiring about why this was happening, the engineer was told that they were deemed to be "ineligible for rehire," which was when they realized they were on some kind of list.

This wasn't the only incident. There have been dozens of cases of laid-off workers who were ghosted while trying to get rehired at Meta, even when they had met or exceeded expectations during their previous employment at the tech giant.

Business Insider spoke to five former employee, including two managers, who all said Meta maintains internal "do not rehire" lists of ex-workers.

While there are some obvious reasons why an employee might find themselves on one of these lists, such as stealing confidential data from Meta or being a consistently poor performer, one former manager said it wasn't difficult to have someone's name added, especially if a manager didn't like the person.

Meta's barring of former workers from being rehired without a good reason and not informing them of the decision is an unusual practice within the tech industry. Lazlo Bock, Google's head of people operations for a decade until 2016, said it was "incredibly uncommon. This is very, very rare." Block said he's never heard of companies maintaining do-not-rehire lists. However, others in the tech industry say Meta isn't the only firm with these lists – they're just not talked about.

It's noted that lists of this kind are not illegal unless they discriminate against protected characteristics.

As for why people would want to be rehired by an employer that laid them off, one said, "It's the worst company I've ever worked for. But they also pay the best. If I could get in there for a couple more years and make bank, I would do it."

In January, CEO Mark Zuckerberg informed employees that 5% of the workforce, or around 3,600 people, were being laid off. The cuts were supposed to be performance-based, but reports state that many workers who met or exceeded expectations were among those let go.

Permalink to story:

 
Don't you just love disgruntled, incompetent managers that can never ever let something go? Like ever. They just live in their bubble till eternity.

I've been hearing the SAME FRIGGIN CRAP from my CEO for 10 friggin' years about "my attitude". Which has been totally different for at least 5 years now. According to... everyone, pretty much.

Whenever I asked for an example of bad behavior, he'd just dismiss me. He can't give examples rn! Whatever, man. We finally parted this January. Enough is enough.
 
So Meta is doing something every other company I plan on Earth does it's not a secret list it's just a list held by HR and manager can give their recommendation at an employee is not eligible for retired for any number of reasons. Maybe their performance was excellent but they're ability to get along with team members was poor. Maybe they frequently came in 30 minutes late for your shifts everyday, are they may have been promoting political or social justice causes at work either any number of reasons and every HR department on the planet does this if you think they don't I've got a bridge a saw you that'll take you from Houston to Hong Kong in 5 minutes
 
Don't you just love disgruntled, incompetent managers that can never ever let something go? Like ever. They just live in their bubble till eternity.

I've been hearing the SAME FRIGGIN CRAP from my CEO for 10 friggin' years about "my attitude". Which has been totally different for at least 5 years now. According to... everyone, pretty much.

Whenever I asked for an example of bad behavior, he'd just dismiss me. He can't give examples rn! Whatever, man. We finally parted this January. Enough is enough.
It is a totally human thing. I mean you see a person for the first time and can already feel if you like the person or not. And as the time goes, the feeling only gets stronger.
I guess the only difference is that some people can recognize that they do not have actual reasons to dislike such person and hold themselves from being mean to them. Others just look for excuses to justify how they feel to those people.
 
Actually there are blacklists everywhere. One of the reasons we have a bunch of Thomsons but none of Jobs.
 
Many businesses big and small have a "do not hire" list, it's no secret. The lists have been around for decades. Yes, the list can be abused if as an employee you find yourself on the bad side of a manager.
 
My pihole blocks everything from Meta. Not a single packet leaves my network headed for Meta anything. Trash company.
 
There have been dozens of cases of laid-off workers who were ghosted while trying to get rehired at Meta, even when they had met or exceeded expectations during their previous employment at the tech giant.
The cuts were supposed to be performance-based, but reports state that many workers who met or exceeded expectations were among those let go.
Maybe their performance just wasn't good enough and that's why they're ineligible for rehire. It's completely reasonable to not rehire someone you already let go once before.
 
As others had said, this is a very common thing. Not everyone that left a company does so on good terms. At my first job, I personally saw a employee slaking just to get fired, since in my country (Brazil) the company must pay a compensation to the employee, if the firing is not justifiable (gross incompetence). So people abuse the system when changing jobs to get some money. And since the labor court system strongly leans toward workers, companies don't think is worth the hassle fighting the ex-employee in court, so they just pay up to get hid of the slacker. So you can bet your furry * those people enter a list and will never get re-hired.
 
I dont see anything here.

If the employee was a good employee, fit in with others, wasnt a nuisance and did his/her job, they would get rehired.

Companies dont like to waste good talent, it isnt that easy to find, so imo, if they cant get rehired, like most said, they were a problem.
 
When I was a manager at my previous company I encountered a few engineers I would absolutely blacklist based on behaviour and complete incompetency.
 
The only thing surprising here would be if there's literally a flat text list in a Word document titled "SECRET do-not-hire list".

Think about it the other way around. Let's say a company had to let someone go for being physically abusive in the workplace. If that company were then to re-hire that same person several years later, and there was another problem, everyone would be screaming negligence at the company for not being more careful.

The only thing I'd expect to differ would be rather vs. a centralized "secret do not rehire list" is that the source materials would more typically be the standard HR files with past reviews, etc., and of course the recruiter/hiring managers would be expected to reach out to people who worked with the candidate last time around. Same effect, different name.
 
Every company has this.
During the exit interview and administration there is typically a box that is checked. That box says 'Eligible for rehire'. If you were a lousy employee or didn't give proper notice when leaving you should expect that box not to be checked. It is also not checked for terminations for cause. Layoffs almost never are (unless you suck).
 
The article does not contain even one shred of something even remotely resembling an evidence.
( Hint: 'the engineer was told that...' is not evidence. People considering themselves 'top performer' and being rejected is not evidence either).

No company managed by sane people would maintain do-not-rehire lists in any observable form, because that's a giant can of worms. But any company managed by sane people has these informally - because it would be *****ic to repeat mistakes.

The rumor between the employees is that divisions are getting rid of wokesters. Sound plausible, as wokesters, while still untouchable, managed to infuriate everyone normal. That also aligns with the overall return of sanity. But of course there wil never be an evidence for that either.
 
The article does not contain even one shred of something even remotely resembling an evidence.
( Hint: 'the engineer was told that...' is not evidence. People considering themselves 'top performer' and being rejected is not evidence either).

No company managed by sane people would maintain do-not-rehire lists in any observable form, because that's a giant can of worms. But any company managed by sane people has these informally - because it would be *****ic to repeat mistakes.

The rumor between the employees is that divisions are getting rid of wokesters. Sound plausible, as wokesters, while still untouchable, managed to infuriate everyone normal. That also aligns with the overall return of sanity. But of course there wil never be an evidence for that either.
Evidence? How about witness statements? I have personally compiled two such lists. One for Target and one for Home Depot. Yeah, companies do this. It's perfectly legal and legitimate. Companies have the right to protect themselves from harm at the hands of former employees fired for cause, or fired for suspected cause.
 
Doesn't mean it's not an unlawful form of discrimination.
Is it though? It's not discrimination based on sex or skin color. it's only illegal if this list is shared or fi there is zero documentation of that ex-employee having bad results or problems with his behavior.
 
Is it though? It's not discrimination based on sex or skin color. it's only illegal if this list is shared or fi there is zero documentation of that ex-employee having bad results or problems with his behavior.
Sure if it's used the wrong way. Having the lists are not illegal. Using them to unfairly discriminate is. But how would that be investigated and enforced? In addition to that, some places are "right-to-work", meaning that an employee or employer can terminate the job for no reason at all. They don't have to consider anyone as rehireable either.

There are many angles to this kind of thing.
 
Sure if it's used the wrong way. Having the lists are not illegal. Using them to unfairly discriminate is. But how would that be investigated and enforced? In addition to that, some places are "right-to-work", meaning that an employee or employer can terminate the job for no reason at all. They don't have to consider anyone as rehireable either.

There are many angles to this kind of thing.
The ex-employee has to prove in court that he is unfairly discriminated.
 
Back