Meta will record employee screens, clicks, and keystrokes to train AI that may replace them

midian182

Posts: 11,633   +176
Staff member
A hot potato: Working for a large tech company isn't the job utopia it once was. In addition to worrying about layoffs and the constant threat of AI, Meta workers will soon have all their mouse movements, clicks, and keystrokes logged by the company. What's likely to further annoy workers is the purpose for these keyloggers: to train Meta's AI agents so they can perform work tasks.

A new tool called Model Capability Initiative (MCI) will run on work-related apps and also take occasional snapshots of workers' screens, according to internal memos seen by Reuters.

The memos add that MCI will improve Meta's AI models in areas where they struggle to replicate ways that humans interact with computers, such as choosing dropdown-menu options and using keyboard shortcuts.

A Meta spokesman told the BBC: "If we're building agents to help people complete everyday tasks using computers, our models need real examples of how people actually use them."

The spokesman added that the data is not used for any other purposes, that the tool has safeguards in place to protect sensitive content, and that the information gathered won't be used for evaluation purposes.

Now that Mark Zuckerberg's obsession with the metaverse that led to him changing Facebook's corporate name to Meta is over, the social media giant is going all-in on AI. Like other big tech companies, the embrace of automation has led to thousands of job losses recently.

Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth told employees that the increase in internal data collection was part of Meta's "AI for Work" efforts, which have now been rebranded as Agent Transformation Accelerator (ATA).

Bosworth added that Meta's ultimate vision was for its agents to primarily do the work while humans direct, review, and help improve them. The executive never mentioned how this might affect the number of workers Meta requires, but it certainly sounds like a way of reducing its headcount.

Meta is planning to lay off a massive 10% of its workforce starting on May 20, meaning around 8,000 people will be losing their jobs – the company has already laid off around 2,000 people this year. It's also considering making large additional cuts later this year.

Illustrating the AI problem is a website listing all of Meta's current openings: there were 800 job listings in March. Today, there are seven.

Employee responses to news that everything they do will be recorded to train an AI that could replace them have been pretty much what you'd expect. One worker who asked not to be named called it "very dystopian."

"This company has become obsessed with AI," they told the BBC.

Another person who recently left Meta said the tool is just the latest way that it's "shoving AI down everyone's throat," which could describe the industry as a whole right now.

Not every company is following Meta and shoehorning AI into every aspect of its workflow. Duolingo recently stopped evaluating workers based on how much they use the technology. It's a metric that many others, including Meta, have introduced.

Permalink to story:

 
I can just imagine Zucky turning Elizabeth Barret Browning's famous love poem into a "money love" poem.

Seems like Zucky's greed knows no bounds. Will he use this data to replace employees? Who knows. But it wouldn't surprise me if he does.
 
Increase of productivity? That's a good thing lol. It's not like Meta is required to offer those jobs, so why complain? They were only ever offered because they were doing something useful. Besides, unless they are actually laid off, you cannot call it a "job loss". If a company doesn't rehire for a job that somebody left, it is a job saving instead.

In fact, the claim that "the embrace of automation has led to thousands of job losses recently" at Meta is thoroughly unsupported by the source used. It points to a TechSpot article that shows 600 layoffs in an AI team in an unrelated layoff. The article gave a specific example of an employee who was quickly rehired by a different company. This was half a year ago. In a company with 80,000 employees, small layoffs due to occasional restructuring are routine (less than 1% of employees).

5+ years ago, small layoffs like these would only be reported by TechSpot if the business was struggling, because it would be newsworthy. After perusing a few pages of search results, these 4 articles I found on legacy mobile phone companies are all the small layoffs I could find. The layoffs were painted in a very different light:
https://www.techspot.com/news/71333-nokia-lay-off-310-employees-focus-patents-health.html
https://www.techspot.com/news/73310-nokia-conducting-strategic-review-digital-health-business.html
https://www.techspot.com/news/53366-blackberry-lays-off-250-rd-product-testing-employees.html
https://www.techspot.com/news/63734-blackberry-disputes-1000-employee-layoff-rumor-cut-only.html

To me, this article is clearly biased against AI. The author is injecting his own opinion about AI without evidence to back it up. The reporting at TechSpot has increasingly been pointing to a boogeyman, generally aimed at big tech. Maybe the website should be renamed to AntiTechSpot.
 
Meta hired AI specialists to build a AI based moderation. Once that was setup, operative they sacked those + the majority of people who where responsible for moderation. If you report something now (such as scam ads ) their dumb AI flags it as not breaking guidelines, while every human could see the very signs that it was a scam website.

Rest assured that those who get tracked now will be replaced by AI. That's meta's wet dream. One man the rest AI.
 
To me, this article is clearly biased against AI. The author is injecting his own opinion about AI without evidence to back it up. The reporting at TechSpot has increasingly been pointing to a boogeyman
To be fair, I doubt the author here is actually biased against AI; he's simply gaslighting a gullible anti-AI audience for more clicks.
 
There's some pretty disgusting companies in the world, but I'm not sure any top Zuckerberg's empire for moral bankruptcy.
Mark Zuckerberg not only has the most punchable face in history but he is also in the very top tier of human-horror-shows alongside luminaries like Putin, Trump, Bezos and Musk.
 
They will need to get their employees to sign off on this type of monitoring unless it's already in their contract - if that's the case then it's good they are letting them know, so that they aren't surprised. This should actually be rolled out to all operating systems and phones in the world - that way it would be a good way to catch criminals in the act - imagine monitoring a text between two bad guys and having the cops show up just as the crime is happening and arresting them
 
Well, one benefit of AI is...one of these days it will replace Zuck and the "board" won't have any use for him. 🤣
(not that he's that useful in my opinion anyway) ;)
 
They will need to get their employees to sign off on this type of monitoring unless it's already in their contract - if that's the case then it's good they are letting them know, so that they aren't surprised. This should actually be rolled out to all operating systems and phones in the world - that way it would be a good way to catch criminals in the act - imagine monitoring a text between two bad guys and having the cops show up just as the crime is happening and arresting them
Kind of a Judge Dredge....
 
Repulsive little lizard...He makes my skin crawl every time I see his picture.
Aint just him. All bosses of these giant companies make me feel the same way. There is something very unhuman about them. The way they talk, think and express themselves...
 
Increase of productivity? That's a good thing lol. It's not like Meta is required to offer those jobs, so why complain? They were only ever offered because they were doing something useful. Besides, unless they are actually laid off, you cannot call it a "job loss". If a company doesn't rehire for a job that somebody left, it is a job saving instead.

In fact, the claim that "the embrace of automation has led to thousands of job losses recently" at Meta is thoroughly unsupported by the source used. It points to a TechSpot article that shows 600 layoffs in an AI team in an unrelated layoff. The article gave a specific example of an employee who was quickly rehired by a different company. This was half a year ago. In a company with 80,000 employees, small layoffs due to occasional restructuring are routine (less than 1% of employees).

5+ years ago, small layoffs like these would only be reported by TechSpot if the business was struggling, because it would be newsworthy. After perusing a few pages of search results, these 4 articles I found on legacy mobile phone companies are all the small layoffs I could find. The layoffs were painted in a very different light:
https://www.techspot.com/news/71333-nokia-lay-off-310-employees-focus-patents-health.html
https://www.techspot.com/news/73310-nokia-conducting-strategic-review-digital-health-business.html
https://www.techspot.com/news/53366-blackberry-lays-off-250-rd-product-testing-employees.html
https://www.techspot.com/news/63734-blackberry-disputes-1000-employee-layoff-rumor-cut-only.html

To me, this article is clearly biased against AI. The author is injecting his own opinion about AI without evidence to back it up. The reporting at TechSpot has increasingly been pointing to a boogeyman, generally aimed at big tech. Maybe the website should be renamed to AntiTechSpot.
Because when the power goes out and the pc's won't come back on again because no one is there to type in the passwords he will be screaming 'I told you AI was bad'!!
 
Back