Meta's leak problem just cost 20 employees their jobs, with more firings expected

Most people don't leak things if their company isn't doing something shady?
I was going to say most people don't give a rat's behind what a CEO says, regardless of brilliance or stupidity, unless of course said CEO is doing something shady most people would be angry about if they found out
 
This is not even a story.
If it happened at IBM, General Motors, or etc.. these firings would be expected!

/eos
 
Good. Clean up the DEI trash and throw em in an incinerator. Not even the ashes will be remembered.
 
According to these comments, people who complain about a CEO saying he wants "masculine energy" in his company are DEI trash.

I wonder how those same commenters would feel about someone saying they want "feminine energy" in their company?
 
>> "We try to be really open and then everything I say leaks. It sucks," Zuckerberg said.

Apparently without even a hint of irony
 
Strange headline. It makes it sound like 20 innocent employees randomly lost their job because Meta has a "leak problem", vs. the much more straightforward "Large company fires 20 employees who improperly disclosed confidential data". The latter is hardly unique to Meta although its unusual for companies to publish a total of how many were fired in a given period for this.
Yeah it's not even news. People do dumb shiet and get fired all the time.

Nice opportunity for the partisan zealots to call each other and everyone else names though.

This is not even a story.
If it happened at IBM, General Motors, or etc.. these firings would be expected!

/eos
Exactly


It's disappointing seeing Techspot helping to fuel the social crisis. A dark period in tech journalism, and media content in general.
 
Last edited:
Back