Mozilla says Microsoft is using Copilot and Edge to tighten its grip on Windows

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,029   +59
Staff
Editor's take: As Microsoft builds Copilot AI deeper into Windows, the move is rekindling debate over how much control any one company should exercise over the computing environment that so many people rely on. For Mozilla, that question has become a renewed challenge to Microsoft's dominance over the desktop and its implications for competition.

In a recent statement, Mozilla argued that Microsoft's design choices – particularly those that link the Windows experience tightly to Edge and Copilot – undermine genuine user control. When Microsoft embeds features that favor its own browser and AI tools, it removes opportunities for competing software to be used at all, Mozilla said.

At issue is not just how people interact with Microsoft's latest AI layer, but also how deeply the company's software ecosystem shapes user behavior. Changing a default browser in Windows, for instance, remains surprisingly complex. Mozilla points out that even after adjusting multiple settings, key elements of the operating system still open links in Edge, effectively bypassing the user's chosen browser.

Examples like Windows Search and Microsoft's productivity apps make that imbalance clear. Taskbar searches can still open in Edge by default, and links clicked in Outlook or Teams can also open in Edge, even when another browser is set as the default. Mozilla contends that these consistent redirects don't just inconvenience users; they distort competition in favor of Microsoft's own stack.

Because Windows continues to dominate the PC market, those design decisions have real commercial impact. The more Windows channels users into Edge, the less Firefox is used. For Mozilla, whose revenue comes primarily from search partnerships tied to browser activity, that means fewer searches and less funding to develop new features. It's an economic feedback loop that hits open-source developers harder than platform owners with deeper pockets.

Microsoft's Copilot rollout intensified that tension. The AI assistant was not just introduced aggressively; it showed up by default on many machines, pinned to the Windows taskbar, and, on some new laptops, mapped to a dedicated Copilot key. Mozilla argues that planned Copilot hooks in tools like File Explorer and system settings extend Microsoft's ecosystem into areas where browser rivals have little or no reach.

From Mozilla's point of view, these moves reveal a pattern: Microsoft embedding its own services so deeply into the OS that alternatives are effectively out of reach. Mozilla warns that if people rely more on built-in AI tools tied to Microsoft's ecosystem, they will spend less time in independent browsers like Firefox.

Mozilla frames its approach to AI differently. Mozilla said new AI features in Firefox are opt-in and can be turned off from a central settings panel – tools meant to empower users, not predetermine their experience.

Permalink to story:

 
OpenAI has over 900 million users. MS wants a share of that. It's plain simple. And they are using their OS to "push" the obvious. Just like they did with Teams, Internet explorer, Skype and what more.

If people just start looking for alternatives such as linux. And as a bonus you won't get pushed updates that might one day brick your complete computer.
 
OpenAI has over 900 million users. MS wants a share of that. It's plain simple. And they are using their OS to "push" the obvious. Just like they did with Teams, Internet explorer, Skype and what more.

If people just start looking for alternatives such as linux. And as a bonus you won't get pushed updates that might one day brick your complete computer.

A false equivalency that because Linux is an alternative for you it is true for everyone else and because you had update problems everyone else did also. Neither Mac or Linux are alternatives for me, tried both and rather use Windows. Never had an update "brick" my PC going back to Windows 98 (updates which could also be uninstalled as I remember) and reinstalling Windows is rather trivial anyways. (time consuming yes!)
 
Microsoft? What is this the 2000s? The king of operating systems is Google w/ Android, dwarfing MS Windows users any day of the week. And Gemini is waaay ahead of Copilot and going toe to toe w/ OpenAI. Why isnt Mozilla saying anything about Google?
 
There is a real battle going on between Microsoft and Google, and Mozilla is just a pawn in this game. Perhaps they should look to Europe for support; Baron Rothschild may agree to shell out some money and lobby for a ban on the forced installation of Edge.
The worst thing would be if they were forced to accept Manifest V3 and the ad blocker stopped working.
 
Last edited:
There is a real battle going on between Microsoft and Google, and Mozilla is just a pawn in this game. Perhaps they should look to Europe for support; Baron Rothschild may agree to shell out some money and lobby for a ban on the forced installation of Edge.
The worst thing would be if they were forced to accept Manifest V3 and the ad blocker stopped working.
They'll drop V2 eventually, not because they are forced to, nobody can force them, but rather because FF is controlled opposition funded by Google.
Microsoft? What is this the 2000s? The king of operating systems is Google w/ Android, dwarfing MS Windows users any day of the week. And Gemini is waaay ahead of Copilot and going toe to toe w/ OpenAI. Why isnt Mozilla saying anything about Google?
Android has no bearing in the world of laptops or desktops. Completely different market.
 
I just checked and it seems Firefox is installed by default in major Linux distributions (RHEL, SLES, etc).
So, the complaints are a bit odd.
(I use Firefox on Windows.)
 
I just checked and it seems Firefox is installed by default in major Linux distributions (RHEL, SLES, etc).
So, the complaints are a bit odd.
(I use Firefox on Windows.)
The complaints are not odd. Desktop Linux is a rounding error in user count. Microsoft is the dominant desktop OS.
 
Firefox should first improve its performance, then complain. Whatever wrong tactics Microsoft might use to force Edge, the latter is visibly faster.

I have used Firefox for a decade, along with Chrome as the reference alternative. But, as Edge is already on Windows, I got rid of Chrome and am sometimes tempted to do the same with Firefox. Edge is quite good once one customises away all the feature creep on top; Manifest V2 uBO still works.

Edit: After reading Mozilla's statement, I agree with their sentiments. It's a good and accurate criticism of how MS operates.
 
Last edited:
Firefox has always been my browser of choice, I don't use another (except for compatibility testing) and don't plan to.

That said, little of the above is true.
Changing the default browser in Windows is not "surprisingly complex", it's exactly as easy as changing any other default application. Residual link opening in Edge after switching the default browser is simply a bug. The same happens also in reverse, if you set the default to Edge, some links on some systems keep opening in the old default. Not everything is a conspiracy.
Oh .. and copilot can be uninstalled.
 
Funny how memory works. I remember in 2002 when Microsoft was "almost" forcibly broken up because their products at the time, Windows, Explorer and Office "locked each other up". This article brought that memory up and I thought: "aren't Alphabet, Apple and the same MS doing the same thing today but a million times worse?" Then with a little bit of research, I found out that the consent decree from that lawsuit expired in 2011, and everyone forgot! lol. They were probably laying the grounds for a sequel, and what a plot it is!

Now it's far worse! Walled gardens, AI agents running a butcher shop on our data, banning other browser engines, paying billions for defaults. I honestly don't blame Microsoft for doing it again with Copilot + Edge. Everyone else is doing it and the law slept for over a decade.

So what happens now? The law isn't dead, but we have to re-litigate the whole thing from scratch, because antitrust memory resets every 10 years. Only this time, we're fighting three trillion‑dollar companies that are also genocide enabling "defense" contractors, under a fascist government. Yes, we live in a reality that surpasses the fiction and awe of the Marvel, DC, Fast &Furious, Star Wars, GoT and Dune sagas combined.

In an age where info is democratized and every hearing gets livestreamed and memed, watching them try to stage a mock trial while denying the enablement of fascist expansion will be… amusing. Pass the popcorn..
 
A false equivalency that because Linux is an alternative for you it is true for everyone else and because you had update problems everyone else did also. Neither Mac or Linux are alternatives for me, tried both and rather use Windows. Never had an update "brick" my PC going back to Windows 98 (updates which could also be uninstalled as I remember) and reinstalling Windows is rather trivial anyways. (time consuming yes!)
This is also a false equivalency, what works for you does not work for everyone else.
The complaints of W11 being one of the worst MS operating systems yet are valid, and the amount of pointless crap Microslop has been piling on has been getting tiring. I know you can debloat the OS and remove a lot of it, but that's not a fix, IMO. Also I shouldn't have to go through the effort of removing garbage like copilot because a multi billion dollar corporation refuses to listen to their users and actually QA test software instead of letting it's users be paying beta testers.
 
This is also a false equivalency, what works for you does not work for everyone else.
The complaints of W11 being one of the worst MS operating systems yet are valid, and the amount of pointless crap Microslop has been piling on has been getting tiring. I know you can debloat the OS and remove a lot of it, but that's not a fix, IMO. Also I shouldn't have to go through the effort of removing garbage like copilot because a multi billion dollar corporation refuses to listen to their users and actually QA test software instead of letting it's users be paying beta testers.
Agreed.

The last three months of updates have absolutely made me lose all faith in Microslop to get anything right. January was the worst of them all with two out-of-band updates to issues that should've NEVER became a public issue. March had a similar issue but at least the blast radius was contained to those who were brave enough to test preview updates.

I really have to ask who the hell is running the company these days because the way I see it, it's like the inmates are running the asylum.
 
I've read lots of debates as to what model is best for what purpose and how various people have built their AI workflow setups.

Not once have I seen the answer "I chose Ask Copilot because it was built into windows"

Maybe this will be how a mainstream audience thinks one day in the future but I've seen zero evidence of it so far.

Meanwhile I've seen plenty of "I wish windows was less bloated and unreliable and they sure are testing the limits of what will finally get me to go through the inconvenience of switching to linux".
 
On the contrary, CoPilot finally drove me away from Windows. And I am glad that I did so given how buggy Windows have also become.
 
This is also a false equivalency, what works for you does not work for everyone else.
The complaints of W11 being one of the worst MS operating systems yet are valid, and the amount of pointless crap Microslop has been piling on has been getting tiring. I know you can debloat the OS and remove a lot of it, but that's not a fix, IMO. Also I shouldn't have to go through the effort of removing garbage like copilot because a multi billion dollar corporation refuses to listen to their users and actually QA test software instead of letting it's users be paying beta testers.
I wasn't the one proclaiming people should look for a Windows 11 alternative. I don't care what you use Mac, Linux, Unix, an Abacus! Not everyone wants to leave Windows 11!!
 
Mozilla? Aren't they the social justice activism organization that occasionally makes software? No thanks.
 
Back