Nokia switches to Windows Phone as primary smartphone platform

Emil

Posts: 152   +0
Staff

As rumored, Microsoft and Nokia have announced a broad strategic partnership to create a new global mobile ecosystem that includes market-leading mobile products and services designed to benefit consumers, operators, and developers alike. The two are promising rapid time to market execution as well as completely new service offerings, while extending established products and services to new markets, collaborating on joint marketing initiatives, and sharing their development roadmap for mobile products.

To be more specific, Nokia is adopting Windows Phone as its principal smartphone strategy, contributing its expertise on hardware design and language support to help bring the platform to a larger range of price points, market segments, and geographies. For example, Nokia's extensive operator billing agreements will make it easier for consumers to purchase Nokia Windows Phone services in countries where credit card use is low.

If Windows Phone is number one for Nokia, you might be wondering what happens to its other mobile OSes. Symbian will become a franchise platform, leveraging previous investments to harvest additional value; after all, there is an installed base of 200 million Symbian owners. Nokia expects to sell approximately 150 million more Symbian devices in the years to come. MeeGo, on the other hand, will become an open-source mobile operating system project with increased emphasis on longer-term market exploration of next-generation devices, platforms, and user experiences. Nokia still plans to ship a MeeGo-related product later this year (we think it's their tablet).

Additionally, Nokia's devices and services will have their search powered by Bing and their advertising services powered by Microsoft adCenter, although Nokia Maps is not going away – it will simply be integrated with the two. On the developer side of things, Microsoft's development tools will be used to create applications to run on Nokia Windows Phones, while Nokia's content and application store will be integrated with the Windows Phone Marketplace.

The link in the video above suggests that you go and read the Open Letter from Nokia CEO Stephen Elop and Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer. We've reposted it below for your convenience:

Today in London, our two companies announced plans for a broad strategic partnership that combines the respective strengths of our companies and builds a new global mobile ecosystem. The partnership increases our scale, which will result in significant benefits for consumers, developers, mobile operators and businesses around the world. We both are incredibly excited about the journey we are on together.

While the specific details of the deal are being worked out, here’s a quick summary of what we are working towards:

  • Nokia will adopt Windows Phone as its primary smartphone strategy, innovating on top of the platform in areas such as imaging, where Nokia is a market leader.
  • Nokia will help drive and define the future of Windows Phone. Nokia will contribute its expertise on hardware design, language support, and help bring Windows Phone to a larger range of price points, market segments and geographies.
  • Nokia and Microsoft will closely collaborate on development, joint marketing initiatives and a shared development roadmap to align on the future evolution of mobile products.
  • Bing will power Nokia’s search services across Nokia devices and services, giving customers access to Bing’s next generation search capabilities. Microsoft adCenter will provide search advertising services on Nokia’s line of devices and services.
  • Nokia Maps will be a core part of Microsoft’s mapping services. For example, Maps would be integrated with Microsoft’s Bing search engine and adCenter advertising platform to form a unique local search and advertising experience.
  • Nokia’s extensive operator billing agreements will make it easier for consumers to purchase Nokia Windows Phone services in countries where credit-card use is low.
  • Microsoft development tools will be used to create applications to run on Nokia Windows Phones, allowing developers to easily leverage the ecosystem’s global reach.
  • Microsoft will continue to invest in the development of Windows Phone and cloud services so customers can do more with their phone, across their work and personal lives.
  • Nokia’s content and application store will be integrated with Microsoft Marketplace for a more compelling consumer experience.

We each bring incredible assets to the table. Nokia’s history of innovation in the hardware space, global hardware scale, strong history of intellectual property creation and navigation assets are second to none. Microsoft is a leader in software and services; the company’s incredible expertise in platform creation forms the opportunity for its billions of customers and millions of partners to get more out of their devices.

Together, we have some of the world’s most admired brands, including Windows, Office, Bing, Xbox Live, NAVTEQ and Nokia. We also have a shared understanding of what it takes to build and sustain a mobile ecosystem, which includes the entire experience from the device to the software to the applications, services and the marketplace.

Today, the battle is moving from one of mobile devices to one of mobile ecosystems, and our strengths here are complementary. Ecosystems thrive when they reach scale, when they are fueled by energy and innovation and when they provide benefits and value to each person or company who participates. This is what we are creating; this is our vision; this is the work we are driving from this day forward.

There are other mobile ecosystems. We will disrupt them.

There will be challenges. We will overcome them.

Success requires speed. We will be swift.

Together, we see the opportunity, and we have the will, the resources and the drive to succeed.

Permalink to story.

 
Think Android would have been the better path. I'm avoiding Windows Phone after having suffered 2 years of my HTC Touch HD with Windows Mobile 6.1 and no OS updates.

Call me distrustful but I have a hard time believing Nokia's decision to adopt Windows Phone has nothing what so ever to do with their new CEO Stephen Elop being ex-Microsoft.
 
somehow i think this is a good unprecedented move. so far people whom I know well, they chose nokia NOT because they want to customize it, but they want something simple, especially for tech-challenged people who only use phone to make and receive calls and text.

so far with my quick test on WP7 handsets at stores prove that WP7 is not difficult to use, easy big tiles of thumbnails and etc. just that I haven't see any non-touchscreen WP7.

of course, for those tech and gadget savvy guys, they didnt like WP7 much I guess.
 
I'm definitely a tech guy and I'm quite fond of windows phone. Customizing for additonal features is nice and fun but I don't like having that required to instal fundamental things like OS upgrade. I would've picked a android phone if google were more strict about having manufactures update their devices with android updates.

Microsoft plans to add support for homebrew applications so, I feel windows would be the best choice for me.
 
Arris said:
Think Android would have been the better path. I'm avoiding Windows Phone after having suffered 2 years of my HTC Touch HD with Windows Mobile 6.1 and no OS updates.

Call me distrustful but I have a hard time believing Nokia's decision to adopt Windows Phone has nothing what so ever to do with their new CEO Stephen Elop being ex-Microsoft.

You have to understand that Microsoft has taken a completely different direction with WP7. They are highly invested in the platform, so they have to keep continually updating it and supporting it. This new relationship with Nokia only shows you that Microsoft is in it for the long run. I'm not saying you should go out and buy a WP7 (I really don't care what you do), but I don't think you should completely disregard it.

Also... I sometimes wish Techspot would get rid of being able to post as guests. They are almost always complete trolls with nothing constructive to add.
 
Nokia is a reputable company and choosing WP7 over Android is a strategy choice to differentiate themselves from all the dozens of cheap Android devices on the market.
They make low end and high end phones, Android runs like crap on low end devices and takes a lot of work to make a high end device look polished.
 
Microsoft and Nokia have become buddy buddy for a while now. Maybe that's why they chose WinPhone7, or maybe it's because the new CEO was previously Microsoft, OR because WinPhone7 is a much more closed and strict system than Android and EVERYONE is doing Android OR because Microsoft has given Nokia apparently completely control to do what they want with WinPhone7. Could be anyone of these things. I'm glad to see it though. Legendary Nokia Hardware with a Simple New OS from Microsoft. I'd hit it.
 
Think Android would have been the better path.

Frankly, Android seems and feels like a cheap imitation of iOS despite some of its very good attributes; for once performance degradation which occurs overtime is just unacceptable, and I am not going to talk about other issues. Now leave out Nexus line which Google itself rolls out with the help of other manufacturers; the rest seems just 'okay' nothing special (except for hardware superiority), there are lots of performance /stability issues with it (just like all the other mobile OS around).

Now, WP7 seems to be a very solid foundation provided MS is serious about developing it into something competitive and then keep improving it. I've tried HD7 and newer Omnia recently; and I would have dumped Galaxy S in a heart beat had MS rolled out the promised update by now.

Having used Android for a while I am now more willing to agree with Apple and MS's decision to have tight control over their platforms; as it guarantees acceptable performance / better stability.
 
Well, if people want to buy Microsoft crap on a phone, good for them. I will not be one of those people.
 
Exactly, infact the supplier from whom I usually buy my cell phones, was telling me the other day that he has sold just about same number of HD7s as Galaxy S sets; and none of the former's customer returned with any issues whereas about 20% of Galaxy S buyers have came back; give you a reason to think about doesn't it.

Secondly, I just remembered something, and when Nokia roll out WP7 device carrying CBCD display (which is the best around at the moment surpassing the SAMOLED of Samsung), it would be interesting to see how it hold out against the competition.

Either stole them or molested them.

I wonder if that can be termed as 'sexual harassment' .......
 
Archean said:
Think Android would have been the better path.

Frankly, Android seems a cheap imitation of iOS despite some of its very good attributes; for once performance degradation which occurs overtime is just unacceptable, and I am not going to talk about other issues. Now leave out Nexus line which Google itself rolls out with the help of other manufacturers; the rest seems just 'okay' nothing special (except for hardware superiority), there are lots of performance /stability issues with it (just like all the other mobile OS around).

Now, WP7 seems to be a very solid foundation provided MS is serious about developing it into something competitive and then keep improving it. I've tried HD7 and newer Omnia recently; and I would have dumped Galaxy S in a heart beat had MS rolled out the promised update by now.

Having used Android for a while I am now more willing to agree with Apple and MS's decision to have tight control over their platforms; as it guarantees acceptable performance / better stability.

I have a galaxy s and a nexus s. I haven't experienced performance degrade with either. Give evidence.
 
Archean said:
Think Android would have been the better path.

Frankly, Android seems a cheap imitation of iOS despite some of its very good attributes; for once performance degradation which occurs overtime is just unacceptable, and I am not going to talk about other issues. Now leave out Nexus line which Google itself rolls out with the help of other manufacturers; the rest seems just 'okay' nothing special (except for hardware superiority), there are lots of performance /stability issues with it (just like all the other mobile OS around).

Now, WP7 seems to be a very solid foundation provided MS is serious about developing it into something competitive and then keep improving it. I've tried HD7 and newer Omnia recently; and I would have dumped Galaxy S in a heart beat had MS rolled out the promised update by now.

Having used Android for a while I am now more willing to agree with Apple and MS's decision to have tight control over their platforms; as it guarantees acceptable performance / better stability.

I have a galaxy s and a nexus s. I haven't experienced performance degrade with either. Give evidence. I also have the HD7 and I prefer my nexus because of the customization.
 
The problem of degradation lies with one issue, that is Android not cleaning out memory even when one has closed the applications hence the need for task killer etc. and if one forgets to do this don't get shocked if in few hours time your battery has dropped 20% or so charge.

I haven't had chance to play with Nexus S, but with experience from Nexus One I am sure it will be much better than Galaxy S in these areas, because of one simple reason, it is being shipped by Google with 'pure' OS not like all those cooked roms other manufacturers come-up with.

Now to HD7, personally I don't like its screen so I have decided not to bother with it for now.
 
I've had the opportunity to play with a few windows phones and am seriously looking at the LG quantum. I find the only people who don't like WP7 are people who've never tried it. Over the past 2 years I think Microsoft has been putting out better products, WP7 being one of them. It seems like people hate on MS just because it was cool back in the vista days. Grow up already and go out and try one for yourself. I find WP7 much more comfortable than Android or iOS. It's easy to navigate and the music player has iOS and Android beat by a long shot. Zune media player is great for syncing music. If you ever get the chance, play around with the mobile version of office, It's pretty powerful. WP7 is nothing like other windows mobile OS's

Microsoft has come a LONG way. You can expect the same quality from WP7 as you can from windows 7.
 
Archean said:
The problem of degradation lies with one issue, that is Android not cleaning out memory even when one has closed the applications hence the need for task killer etc. and if one forgets to do this don't get shocked if in few hours time your battery has dropped 20% or so charge.

I've actually heard that you SHOULDN'T use Advanced Task Killer. I forgot exactly how it works, but Android will drop programs from the memory as it needs fit I think? I really can't remember. I was only interested in Android for a couple of weeks while trying out an HTC Desire.
 
Thanks for adding the office bit yRaz, to be honest, Android's office compatible thing seems rubbish when I compare it with the MS Office found on WP7 devices (I believe one shouldn't be surprised at this anyway).

I don't know Jibberish but thank you for sharing the info, however, if I don't clean out the memory I suspect the phone would hardly last for 30-40 hours on one charge. I think despite a little performance hit, WP7 implementation of suspending applications when not in use is a brilliant idea which help improve battery life as well even if you forgot to close application in question.
 
Smart move by Microsoft to team with Nokia and give Windows Phone 7 a better global reach. I do not think Nokia will fare much better in the US unless consumers and analyst stop sweating everything Apple.

TheSyberGroup
 
Archean said:
The problem of degradation lies with one issue, that is Android not cleaning out memory even when one has closed the applications hence the need for task killer etc. and if one forgets to do this don't get shocked if in few hours time your battery has dropped 20% or so charge.

I haven't had chance to play with Nexus S, but with experience from Nexus One I am sure it will be much better than Galaxy S in these areas, because of one simple reason, it is being shipped by Google with 'pure' OS not like all those cooked roms other manufacturers come-up with.

Now to HD7, personally I don't like its screen so I have decided not to bother with it for now.

Not true. Androids memory management is actually better than ios. A program will stop using memory. If you use a task killer it will kill the program but the program will restart. this causes it to use memory again. If you need more info head over to XDA devs.
 
Back