Eldrach
Posts: 599 +776
Right now - the percentage of gaming revenue is high enough that Nvidia isn't going to let it go.Yes, it's a sad, painful future we're facing: we'll develop new drugs and medical treatments, create new lighter, stronger, more durable materials, make new discoveries in everything from archeology to cosmology, and turbocharge the productivity of transportation, agriculture, and manufacturing-- but gamers will have to limp along in the same frame rates in Counterstrike as they've were forced to endure in 2025.
Luckily that isn't true. In five years, you'll be gaming on GPUs designed by the very AI you deride, and produced in sub-2nm fabs funded by AI demand.
Once the gaming revenue drops to a percentile that it doesn't "make sense" to develop consumer GPU's..Why would they do it?
My comment is not about AI as a tool, it has its uses, and it's a "quantum leap" for the global industry.
What I'm predicting, is that developing gaming products will hit a percentile so low that it doesn't make sense for them to give it any focus. What's the point of spending R&D on consumer gpu's if it's 1% of your total revenue?
Nvidia is already skipping an entire generation of Gpu's - the financial motive is too low.
Gaming revenue will continue to drop in comparison with AI compute.
Sure, they could utilize AI to help them develop gaming gpu's....or the could use it to create better AI focused infrastructure.
Could very well be that in 10 years, the Chinese will be leading the gaming market - as they're seriously trying to close the gap