Opinion: Things Intel Needs to Fix

Haven't bought a new Intel CPU since my 3770K back in 2012, and I won't any time soon... tired of the rip off! I remember how disappointed I was when I learned about the awful TIM they put on my brand new CPU! Got a pair of used Xeon 2680 V2s on my old Asus Z9PA D8 mobo, and it just rocks... Got both of them for around $400! Cinebench R15 gives me a 2685 rating!
If upgrading, I would probably go AMD now.
 
I don't really care too much about anything besides the TIM and the overclocking on lower models. AMD's stock coolers look good but when tested they have proven to be pretty rubbish really and beaten by $25 alternatives.

The fact you can delid pretty much any CPU since Skylake and cut enormous load temperatures off it without fail doesn't reflect well. I had a 6700K that would do 4.7GHz and run at 80 degrees celsius on my cooling, then you delid it and it'll do 4.8GHz and run at 65.

The second thing is back in the days especially Core 2, overclocking was the nuts. You could take an $80 CPU and make it as fast as a $300 one albeit sacrificing heat and power. It lost on some apps because of the lack of cache, on others it hardly mattered. The difference was of course, you could then take the $300 CPU and make it run beyond that as well. So there was still value in the higher end models for enthusiasts.

Everyone else though had a lot of fun with the E21xx and E4xxx series.
 
Last edited:
Informative article. Very well done. Especially the part about making overclocking available on more/all SKU's.
The only part I didn't agree/care about is the TDP.

I don't remember anyone other than enthusiasts and system builders being unhappy with stock Intel coolers, and enthusiasts and system builders are going to know what cooler they need based on research they would/should be doing anyway.

After a very quick search I found this explanation (quoted below), and I'm posting it here, because that's what I remember reading years ago about it when I was interested in why Intel and AMD used different naming schemes for it.

"TDP stands for Thermal Design Power. And while many computer users may think it equates to the maximum amount of power at which a component can run, that isn't the case. TDP is technically the max amount of power the cooling system needs to dissipate in order to keep the chip at or below its maximum temperature."
 
Nope. I don't agree with this article. At all.

Let Intel be the way Intel always is.

That's the only chance AMD could ever beat them.
 
Back