RAM prices expected to rise another 40-50% in Q3 2026, and then 30% more in Q4 as AI demand outpaces supply

Daniel Sims

Posts: 2,468   +74
Staff
Winners & losers: The memory shortages pushing consumer electronics prices higher are expected to worsen through the rest of this year and into 2027, with possible relief not arriving until 2028. While manufacturers and industry analysts largely attribute the spike to AI infrastructure demand, a new California lawsuit accuses the three companies that dominate DRAM and NAND production of conspiring to exploit those conditions and artificially inflate prices.

Ethan Tan, a memory industry consultant and former Samsung China executive, told Jefferies Equity Research analysts during a recent briefing that he expects memory prices to rise by 40% to 50% in the third quarter of 2026 compared to the prior quarter, and by another 30% to 40% in Q4. Those figures significantly exceed prior estimates from Western investors and Jefferies' own internal research.

Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron together produce nearly all of the world's DRAM and NAND, which commands far higher margins in AI data centers than in consumer PCs, smartphones, or game consoles.

With data center demand currently exceeding the three companies' combined production capacity, prices have climbed as much as 700% over four years. Consumer memory has grown prohibitively expensive as a result, prompting steep price hikes from Apple, Sony, and Microsoft, among others.

Tan calculates that since advances in semiconductor nodes will only increase supply by 7% to 8% in 2026, shortages will persist into next year, when prices could rise another 40% to 45% annually. A combination of expanding supply and moderating AI demand may push prices back down 15% to 20% in 2028.

Also read: DDR5 Prices Are Broken, So We Tested Cheaper Chinese RAM

Furthermore, the impact of Chinese suppliers such as CXMT is expected to be limited in 2026 and 2027, primarily because domestic manufacturers lack access to the advanced fabrication techniques, such as EUV lithography, needed to produce next-generation chips.

Benchmarks show that CXMT's DDR5 RAM is already viable for consumer PCs, and Apple has been lobbying the US government for permission to source from the blacklisted company. But CXMT will not be able to advance to DDR6 or HBM3E in the near term. Tan does, however, expect China's domestic NAND technology to reach parity with the rest of the industry by 2028.

A group of 17 California plaintiffs argues that the situation is at least partly by design. As reported by Law360, a new lawsuit accuses Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron of deliberately restricting DRAM supply to inflate prices in an anticompetitive manner.

If the case moves forward, it would be at least the third memory price-fixing scandal in roughly 30 years.

In Garciaguirre et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al., the plaintiffs accuse the trio of curtailing DRAM production even as prices rose, pivoting capacity toward HBM server memory, and eliminating conventional supply channels to push prices higher. Their central argument: in a truly competitive market, at least one manufacturer would have increased output in response to rising prices, forcing a reaction from the others.

The case also highlights the towering barrier to entry that has kept advanced DRAM and NAND production in the hands of just three players. Building fabs costs tens of billions of dollars, takes years, and requires decades of accumulated trade secrets. US export controls further prevent Chinese companies like CXMT from acquiring the most advanced manufacturing equipment.

If the case moves forward, it would be at least the third memory price-fixing scandal in roughly 30 years.

Samsung, SK Hynix (then Hynix), Micron, and the now-defunct DRAM divisions of Infineon and Elpida pleaded guilty to conspiring to fix prices between 1998 and 2002, with Samsung paying a $300 million fine and SK Hynix paying $185 million.

The same three giants came under suspicion again when prices spiked in the late 2010s, triggering a US class action in 2018, which was ultimately dismissed on appeal for lack of sufficient evidence, and a Chinese government investigation.

Permalink to story:

 
I'll be the first to call BS on this. Memory prices were flat in May and trended downward in June. I don't expect substantial price drops until 2027, but the notion that RAM will rise another 70-90% this year is ludicrous. I'm guessing this analyst has some options positions he's trying to profit off of.
 
It's worth noting that Microsoft spent several years trying to persuade users to buy new computers for Windows 11. But every online publication criticized this and urged their readers not to fall for the bait.
The advice against upgrading to DDR5 seemed especially odd (Maybe this was correct for the first DDR5-4800 models). Now I'm glad I didn't listen to that advice.
 
Last edited:
For crying out loud, stop behaving like a young shy girl.
Say what you want: "I want to get 10x more for my memory
and I want it now!"
I am tired of being prepared for something that is gonna happen anyways.

 
It's worth noting that Microsoft spent several years trying to persuade users to buy new computers for Windows 11. But every online publication criticized this and urged their readers not to fall for the bait.
The advice against upgrading to DDR5 seemed especially odd. Now I'm glad I didn't listen to that advice.
What exactly does Microsoft's forced obsolescence of perfectly good hardware have to do with this?

There's no grand conspiracy here. Microsoft wasnt trying to "save" consumers from the AI price jacking. They wanted you to pay them more money to replace perfectly good hardware. This was criticized because it was a blatant money grab.
 
What exactly does Microsoft's forced obsolescence of perfectly good hardware have to do with this?

There's no grand conspiracy here. Microsoft wasnt trying to "save" consumers from the AI price jacking. They wanted you to pay them more money to replace perfectly good hardware. This was criticized because it was a blatant money grab.
Microsoft's goals are one thing, and users' dependence on someone else's opinion is another. Who cares who's imposing their opinion on you - a corporation or an internet troll?
 
Microsoft's goals are one thing, and users' dependence on someone else's opinion is another. Who cares who's imposing their opinion on you - a corporation or an internet troll?
What are you going on about?

Are you one of those guys who says everything is a conspiracy theory and anyone who disagrees with him is a troll? If so, you left your tin foil over at WCCFtech.
 
Not surprised. Memory manufacturers have been the paragons of greed in the computing world for decades now. Nvidia made a valiant effort to dethrone them, but it is now the defending champions' turn at bat. They've never had the opportunity to play with this much leverage though, so now the whole world is feeling it.
 
Last edited:
So, there's basically only three large producers of RAM in the world right now and with high demand they're getting greedier Nvidia style. Thank you, Western monopoly! That's why we constantly see the news that the prices will get even higher. It's all fake, they can't sustain this for more than a few years, because the Chinese are starting to mass produce RAMs on an unprecedented level and so much cheaper. Also, the AI bubble is about to if not burst at least contract as most part of the industry is just empy speculation.
 
IF that happens, you'll see a lot of people say screw it and stop buying NEW technology. No NEW phones, no NEW computers, no NEW autos. The used market might just pick up A LOT.

A lot of the gaming subs on Reddit seem to show people taking up other hobbies.
The gaming industry might get a proper reckoning.
 
So, there's basically only three large producers of RAM in the world right now and with high demand they're getting greedier Nvidia style. Thank you, Western monopoly!
Did they simply stop teaching economics entirely in modern schools? When demand rises beyond supply, there are only two possible outcomes: either the price rises or the shelves run bare. Take your pick: pricey memory, or unavailable memory.

Also, the AI bubble is about to if not burst at least contract as most part of the industry is just empy speculation.
So you believe memory demand is about to drop exponentially -- but you still condemn memory producers for not spending tens of billions of dollars on fabs you believe will soon be idle?
 
Last edited:
Prices have peaked is my guess. Due to people and companies gobbling up memory and forcing an even bigger shortage. Prices will drop slightly soon is my expectation, as supply improves again. It will take years to reach 2024-2025 level tho.
 
Last edited:
What are you going on about?

Are you one of those guys who says everything is a conspiracy theory and anyone who disagrees with him is a troll? If so, you left your tin foil over at WCCFtech.
Simple empirical facts.
New hardware appears. At first, the software runs inefficiently, but after a while, everything improves.
It's unwise to buy outdated hardware.

I don't care about Microsoft, but they offered to buy a modern computer (it's not just TPM 2.0).
I was building a computer in 2022, so I looked at a lot of sites.
Now, many are trying to foist off some old junk.
Of course, if you're happy with your old computer, you don't need to do anything.
 
Last edited:
Did they simply stop teaching economics entirely in modern schools? When demand rises beyond supply, there are only two possible outcomes: either the price rises or the shelves run bare. Take your pick: pricey memory, or unavailable memory.


So you believe memory demand is about to drop exponentially -- but you still condemn memory producers for not spending tens of billions of dollars on fabs you believe will soon be idle?
It's not what I said at all. I believe demand has not risen beyond supply, it's just fake demand sustained by the bubble and because of the monopoly, they rig prices and alarm media "it's bad and we might rise prices again". Fake demand will be dropped once another player enters the field and the Chinese are about to and also by the collapse of the bubble. I believe it's plain market manipulation and this Trifecta of RAM producers represent the same Western conglomerate of interests, that's why I said monopoly.
 
Last edited:
The end of (affordable) personal computing.
DOOOM! GLOOOM!

What is it, 2011 again?
Yep. I've seen the same posts as well.

Also that. However, I will push back a bit, the only computers you'll be able to buy will be pre-builts and appliance like devices.
Everyone keeps parroting this conspiracy theory for some reason. Why would your only choice be a pre built? This makes no sense.
 
Simple empirical facts.
Rambling about trolls isn't a "fact" it's a delusion.
New hardware appears. At first, the software runs inefficiently, but after a while, everything improves.
Software does not become inefficient because new hardware came out. The software remains as efficient as it was before the release. If anything you have it backwards, software becomes less efficient as hardware power increases. See also: windows' continued increases in memory usage for the same tasks.

Also: older CPUs still run windows 11 just fine. There was nothing in the "upgrade" that benefitted most users nor justified new hardware.
It's unwise to buy outdated hardware.
So now we've moved the goalposts from "people were convinced not to upgrade" to this nonsense.
I don't care about Microsoft, but they offered to buy a modern computer (it's not just TPM 2.0).
You want to......run that sentence through your head a few times? What are you trying to say here?

Microsoft didn't offer to buy anyone a PC, they tried to force people to purchase new machines through forced obsolescence.

Also, none of those "requirements" were requirements. You do not need TPM 2.0 or an online MS account or VBS to run 11 perfectly fine.
I was building a computer in 2022, so I looked at a lot of sites.
Now, many are trying to foist off some old junk.
Of course, if you're happy with your old computer, you don't need to do anything.
You want to argue "emperical fact" then start being up personal anecdotes?

Buddy...I think you need to get a dictionary and look up the definition of the words you are using.
 
Everyone keeps parroting this conspiracy theory for some reason. Why would your only choice be a pre built? This makes no sense.
Because they will be the only ones capable of making the economics make sense.

This is something you don't seem to understand, this has the potential to kill off huge portions of the DIY market. ASUS, Gigabyte, MSI, and ASRock are reportedly facing a projected 28% contraction, with ASUS alone expected to sell millions fewer boards. And then there's all the accessory companies like Corsair, Thermaltake, Thermal Grizzly, etc. They depend on people actually building, upgrading, tweaking, cooling, and maintaining PCs. If the “normal enthusiast build” disappears, those companies either shrink, pivot, or die leaving nothing but pre-builts that don't necessarily need externally built accessories, they can be made in-house.

Your field of vision is very narrow, I'm looking out across the horizon.
 
It's not what I said at all. I believe demand has not risen beyond supply, it's just fake demand sustained by the bubble and because of the monopoly, they rig prices and alarm media "it's bad and we might rise prices again". Fake demand will be dropped once another player enters the field and the Chinese are about to and also by the collapse of the bubble. I believe it's plain market manipulation and this Trifecta of RAM producers represent the same Western conglomerate of interests, that's why I said monopoly.
Let's not forget that they were caught doing this exact thing before
 
Buddy...I think you need to get a dictionary and look up the definition of the words you are using.

I haven't studied English, and I don't think that's enough. I think I'd better quietly leave this forum.
But you shouldn't address someone in such a familiar manner.
 
Last edited:
At his point who really cares anymore. This is a race to be top dog and the consumer being in the crosshairs. Even if a anti-trust lawsuit happens against the Big 3, it will take at least a couple of years before we see an end result. By that time we'll have moved on to something else.
 
Back