Redditor tested Amazon's unlimited storage option by uploading 2 million gigabytes of porn

midian182

Posts: 9,738   +121
Staff member

While there are a handful of companies that offer some form of so-called “unlimited” cloud storage, they often have limits. Which is why one Redditor took it upon himself to test this definition by uploading as much data as he could: almost two million gigabytes worth of webcam porn.

First reported by Motherboard, a Reddit user called beaston02 wanted to find out if Amazon’s now-defunct cloud storage option had a cap. To achieve this, he wrote scripts that recorded live-streamed public webcam shows from a number of adult sites, including CamSoda, Chaturbate, and MyFreeCams.

After around five to six months, beaston02 had captured one petabyte, or one million gigabytes, of material, and only stopped recording when he hit 1.8 petabytes, at which point he lost interest.

"It is nearly entirely porn," he said. "Ever since I got into computers, I found myself learning more, and faster when it was something more interesting. Call me crazy, but women interest me more than most other things on the internet and there is a huge amount of data being created daily, so it was a good fit for the project."

"The project ran its course, I got the knowledge I was hoping to get, and I just had no interest in it anymore."

Helpfully, some other Reddit users crunched the numbers to find out how long it would take to consume all that smut. With most webcam streams being less than HD quality, it would take around 102 years to watch it all at a 720p resolution. If it’s at an even lower quality, such as 480p, it would mean staring at a screen for 293 years and six months.

Amazon ended its unlimited storage option in June. Some say beaston02’s actions played a part in the company’s decision, though he denies this. The redditor has since published his scripts on Github, and they are now being used by others to collect their own footage for the “Petabyte Porn Project,” which stores more than 12 terabytes of porn content per day on Amazon’s cloud.

Speaking to CamSoda model Charley Hart about the moral implications of the project, she told Motherboard: "Part of me is ok with some of it. It's one thing if I do it — I think that's the whole thing, it's all about consent."

Permalink to story.

 
If one person was doing it, and they also released a script, you can believe for sure that many other people were doing it. This is why truly unlimited services can't exist. People abuse it just to abuse it. We can't have nice things. Fricken children.
 
Consent? lol you're the one streaming yourself to the internet. Now if someone were to make money by selling the recording then that would be a problem.

It is a problem, there are sites to buy recorded streams of webcam models.... dispite having DMCA watermarked.
I believe recording it is illegal.
 
Things I learned from this article:

1. There is always a bigger troll.

2. Porn somehow = interest in women

3. Amazon apparently wouldn't notice a petabite of data originating from a specific source and use this to inform their policy decisions.

4. Reddit is going to do Reddit things.

Consent? lol you're the one streaming yourself to the internet. Now if someone were to make money by selling the recording then that would be a problem.

The models/cam service still own the copyright.
 
As of right now, it is basically an uber porncam DVR or it was.

Which is a violation of copyright licensing...

From MFC's T&C, which I am assuming is industry standard:

You may only access the Website for your personal, noncommercial use. You will not use any content that you access on the Website for further distribution, performance, display, sale, or rental. You will not record any content, or make any content available on any peer-to-peer network, file sharing service, or other system used for mass transmittal of digital material to others.

It doesn't matter if he sells them. Merely recording them is enough for him to get into significant trouble due to the sheer size of the project. This is, of course, assuming they find it worth while to go after him.
 
Now this is what I call news - so excuse me, gonna fetch me some porn using the dude's scripts ...
 
As of right now, it is basically an uber porncam DVR or it was.

Which is a violation of copyright licensing...

From MFC's T&C, which I am assuming is industry standard:

You may only access the Website for your personal, noncommercial use. You will not use any content that you access on the Website for further distribution, performance, display, sale, or rental. You will not record any content, or make any content available on any peer-to-peer network, file sharing service, or other system used for mass transmittal of digital material to others.

It doesn't matter if he sells them. Merely recording them is enough for him to get into significant trouble due to the sheer size of the project. This is, of course, assuming they find it worth while to go after him.
Would that hold up in court? Isn't timeshifting legal?
 
Would that hold up in court? Isn't timeshifting legal?

He created a program specifically for the purpose of violating over a petabyte of copyrighted licenses. Of course it would hold up in court.
 
Back