Swiss glaciers are melting at alarming rate, losing 10% volume in just two years

Funny a peer-reviewed study was just released that shows that CO2 levels follow temperature rises not the other way around.
And you expect everyone to believe you without a reference? Perhaps you should read this from 2007 https://www.newscientist.com/articl...-rises-disproving-the-link-to-global-warming/ Which clearly states that the phenomenon you cite
It certainly does not challenge the idea that more CO2 heats the planet.

Old news, my friend.
 
Since this comment section is about the article about the melting glaciers... I keep on thinking what kind of new viruses we may find with these melting glaciers leaking away...
 
Ah, so using wiyosaya logic, TS should also do sports articles, because broadcasting also uses computers. Gotcha!

🤦‍♂️
If they did, I would not read the articles because sports is the last of my interests - unless its ice hockey. Besides, TS can publish any article they want. It's part of their 1st amendment rights. Gotcha!🦆
 
Since this comment section is about the article about the melting glaciers... I keep on thinking what kind of new viruses we may find with these melting glaciers leaking away...
You have a good point. Lots of things can survive being frozen.
 
If they did, I would not read the articles because sports is the last of my interests. Besides, TS can publish any article they want. It's part of their 1st amendment rights. Gotcha!🦆
Oh, so, if the articles had nothing to do about tech, you'd have issues with them? What a coincidence...... 😂
 
What a sensational article, this is as alarming as watching paint DRY.

this is just nature doing it's course every cycle for millions of years.

The geomanetic poles switching positions every 12000 years also contribute to this.
 
Did you read your own article? All this states is that it can't just be industrial-caused CO2 causing climate change. They state that the ocean and the earth's albedo are warming the oceans too fast which outputs more CO2 than industrialization did. This article in no way disproves climate change. It supports it!
 
Did you read your own article? All this states is that it can't just be industrial-caused CO2 causing climate change. They state that the ocean and the earth's albedo are warming the oceans too fast which outputs more CO2 than industrialization did. This article in no way disproves climate change. It supports it!
You obviously did look at the charts or understand what you're reading they clearly show temperature rises preceding CO2 rises therefore blowing the whole CO2 climate lie out of the water.
 
You obviously did look at the charts or understand what you're reading they clearly show temperature rises preceding CO2 rises therefore blowing the whole CO2 climate lie out of the water.
I read the whole thing. It does not say what you think it says. It's actually a small data set (Mauna Loa, HI, USA; Barrow, AK, USA; South Pole; global average) designed to prove their point. The very minimal reviews also state that this is a small set. Some were quite concerned that other more recent studies were not encompassed. Shakun et al. (2012), (Parrenin et al. 2013) and a (2015) one?
 
Back