And you expect everyone to believe you without a reference? Perhaps you should read this from 2007 https://www.newscientist.com/articl...-rises-disproving-the-link-to-global-warming/ Which clearly states that the phenomenon you citeFunny a peer-reviewed study was just released that shows that CO2 levels follow temperature rises not the other way around.
It certainly does not challenge the idea that more CO2 heats the planet.
If they did, I would not read the articles because sports is the last of my interests - unless its ice hockey. Besides, TS can publish any article they want. It's part of their 1st amendment rights. Gotcha!Ah, so using wiyosaya logic, TS should also do sports articles, because broadcasting also uses computers. Gotcha!
You have a good point. Lots of things can survive being frozen.Since this comment section is about the article about the melting glaciers... I keep on thinking what kind of new viruses we may find with these melting glaciers leaking away...
Oh, so, if the articles had nothing to do about tech, you'd have issues with them? What a coincidence......If they did, I would not read the articles because sports is the last of my interests. Besides, TS can publish any article they want. It's part of their 1st amendment rights. Gotcha!
That would have had some sting if you had posted the link?Funny a peer-reviewed study was just released that shows that CO2 levels follow temperature rises not the other way around.
That would have had some sting if you had posted the link?
Did you read your own article? All this states is that it can't just be industrial-caused CO2 causing climate change. They state that the ocean and the earth's albedo are warming the oceans too fast which outputs more CO2 than industrialization did. This article in no way disproves climate change. It supports it!On Hens, Eggs, Temperatures and CO2: Causal Links in Earth’s Atmosphere
The scientific and wider interest in the relationship between atmospheric temperature (T) and concentration of carbon dioxide ([CO2]) has been enormous. According to the commonly assumed causality link, increased [CO2] causes a rise in T. However, recent developments cast doubts on this...www.mdpi.com
You obviously did look at the charts or understand what you're reading they clearly show temperature rises preceding CO2 rises therefore blowing the whole CO2 climate lie out of the water.Did you read your own article? All this states is that it can't just be industrial-caused CO2 causing climate change. They state that the ocean and the earth's albedo are warming the oceans too fast which outputs more CO2 than industrialization did. This article in no way disproves climate change. It supports it!
I read the whole thing. It does not say what you think it says. It's actually a small data set (Mauna Loa, HI, USA; Barrow, AK, USA; South Pole; global average) designed to prove their point. The very minimal reviews also state that this is a small set. Some were quite concerned that other more recent studies were not encompassed. Shakun et al. (2012), (Parrenin et al. 2013) and a (2015) one?You obviously did look at the charts or understand what you're reading they clearly show temperature rises preceding CO2 rises therefore blowing the whole CO2 climate lie out of the water.