D
DelJo63
WD 3 and 4 GB drives fail regularly, while the 1 and 2 gbs are just fine.
The Best Storage: SSD, HDD, NAS & More
- Thread starter Julio Franco
- Start date
I have had 12 WD 3TB drives in service for a little of 2 years now, not a single failure and I have 8 WD 4TB models that we use for testing, still not a single failure.
I am surprised about the QNAP recommendation. I would of thought the top spot would have been taken by one of Synology's offerings. I know they aren't cheap but the OS is second to none and hardware is great too (slightly expensive though).
I'm looking forward to seeing the prices of the 960 Evo line though. Thanks for the interesting read
QNAP and Synology are really on par now in terms of software/OS. QNAP offers a broader range however and in my opinion have edged ahead on features offered.
Really? I must be looking at a different Amazon. I only see 8 reviews and the majority are very positive, as they should be the TS-451A is a great NAS. I have not had issues with any of the things you mentioned by the way.
FWIW, The 2-4 bay Synology NAS's definitely have better reviews than 2-4 bay QNAP on Amazon. The QNAP OS definitely seems to frustrate a much larger fraction of people. One thing that puzzles me in the NAS war is the frequent lack of mention of Asustor units. The reviews I've seen have all been very positive, and even the Techspot review of the DS-216+ includes test data that shows the AS-6202T equaling or perhaps even surpassing the DS-216+ in performance.
Asustor is very good. However they are basically a direct copy of the QNAP NAS, I am not sure if they licensed the software and hardware design from QNAP but they are virtually identical and have been since day one. QNAP has better support and a broader range though. There is nothing wrong with the QNAP software, today it is every bit as good as Synologys.
Szarik
Posts: 14 +3
Is this a joke or are you just very confused?
Joke??
Well as I said;according to Passmark and AS SSD Benchmark is downgrade in performance compare to Samsung 850 Evo 500gb and is actually cheaper compare to Samsung 950 Pro 256GB M.2 PCI-e 3.0 x 4 NVMe
Asus X99 Deluxe ii I7 6900k 4.3Ghz
Window 8.1 64 Pro
Samsung 950 Pro 256GB M.2 PCI-e 3.0 x 4 NVMe
Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB (4x8GB) DDR4 PC4-25600C16 3200MHz Dual/Quad Channel
Passmark score/rating 6421.9
AS SSD Benchmark
AS SSD Benchmark 1.9.5986.35387
------------------------------
Name: NVMe Samsung SSD 950
Firmware: 1B0Q
Controller: secnvme
Offset: 541696 K - OK
Size: 238.47 GB
Date: 04/01/2017 21:56:26
------------------------------
Sequential:
------------------------------
Read: 1756.59 MB/s
Write: 911.97 MB/s
------------------------------
4K:
------------------------------
Read: 42.48 MB/s
Write: 153.46 MB/s
------------------------------
4K-64Threads:
------------------------------
Read: 1020.92 MB/s
Write: 290.35 MB/s
------------------------------
Access Times:
------------------------------
Read: 0.031 ms
Write: 0.022 ms
------------------------------
Score:
------------------------------
Read: 1239
Write: 535
Total: 2373
------------------------------
Same build;
Asus X99 Deluxe ii I7 6900k 4.3Ghz
Windows 7 64 Ultimate
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB Rapid Mode
Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB (4x8GB) DDR4 PC4-25600C16 3200MHz Dual/Quad Channel
Passmark score/rating 7471.9
AS SSD Benchmark 1.9.5986.35387
------------------------------
Name: Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB ATA Device
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Controller: msahci
Offset: 103424 K - OK
Size: 465.76 GB
Date: 04/01/2017 22:02:43
------------------------------
Sequential:
------------------------------
Read: 4951.57 MB/s
Write: 3512.43 MB/s
------------------------------
4K:
------------------------------
Read: 144.37 MB/s
Write: 514.60 MB/s
------------------------------
4K-64Threads:
------------------------------
Read: 6652.31 MB/s
Write: 6144.48 MB/s
------------------------------
Access Times:
------------------------------
Read: 0.059 ms
Write: 0.024 ms
------------------------------
Score:
------------------------------
Read: 7292
Write: 7010
Total: 17948
------------------------------
I've made retest again with the time and date stamp and is near same results as before: It's looks like Samsung 850 Evo 500GB Rapid Mode is outperform Samsung 950 Pro 256GB M.2 PCI-e 3.0 x 4 NVMe.
I don't know.. is it a Joke?
Thanks
Joke??
Well as I said;according to Passmark and AS SSD Benchmark is downgrade in performance compare to Samsung 850 Evo 500gb and is actually cheaper compare to Samsung 950 Pro 256GB M.2 PCI-e 3.0 x 4 NVMe
Asus X99 Deluxe ii I7 6900k 4.3Ghz
Window 8.1 64 Pro
Samsung 950 Pro 256GB M.2 PCI-e 3.0 x 4 NVMe
Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB (4x8GB) DDR4 PC4-25600C16 3200MHz Dual/Quad Channel
Passmark score/rating 6421.9
AS SSD Benchmark
AS SSD Benchmark 1.9.5986.35387
------------------------------
Name: NVMe Samsung SSD 950
Firmware: 1B0Q
Controller: secnvme
Offset: 541696 K - OK
Size: 238.47 GB
Date: 04/01/2017 21:56:26
------------------------------
Sequential:
------------------------------
Read: 1756.59 MB/s
Write: 911.97 MB/s
------------------------------
4K:
------------------------------
Read: 42.48 MB/s
Write: 153.46 MB/s
------------------------------
4K-64Threads:
------------------------------
Read: 1020.92 MB/s
Write: 290.35 MB/s
------------------------------
Access Times:
------------------------------
Read: 0.031 ms
Write: 0.022 ms
------------------------------
Score:
------------------------------
Read: 1239
Write: 535
Total: 2373
------------------------------
Same build;
Asus X99 Deluxe ii I7 6900k 4.3Ghz
Windows 7 64 Ultimate
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB Rapid Mode
Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB (4x8GB) DDR4 PC4-25600C16 3200MHz Dual/Quad Channel
Passmark score/rating 7471.9
AS SSD Benchmark 1.9.5986.35387
------------------------------
Name: Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB ATA Device
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Controller: msahci
Offset: 103424 K - OK
Size: 465.76 GB
Date: 04/01/2017 22:02:43
------------------------------
Sequential:
------------------------------
Read: 4951.57 MB/s
Write: 3512.43 MB/s
------------------------------
4K:
------------------------------
Read: 144.37 MB/s
Write: 514.60 MB/s
------------------------------
4K-64Threads:
------------------------------
Read: 6652.31 MB/s
Write: 6144.48 MB/s
------------------------------
Access Times:
------------------------------
Read: 0.059 ms
Write: 0.024 ms
------------------------------
Score:
------------------------------
Read: 7292
Write: 7010
Total: 17948
------------------------------
I've made retest again with the time and date stamp and is near same results as before: It's looks like Samsung 850 Evo 500GB Rapid Mode is outperform Samsung 950 Pro 256GB M.2 PCI-e 3.0 x 4 NVMe.
I don't know.. is it a Joke?
Thanks
Yes, it is a joke...
Szarik
Posts: 14 +3
Yes, it is a joke...
Please can you be more specific why it is a joke?
Thanks
Steve,I've asked you a question,so can please replay..?
Thanks
