The top three percent of YouTubers account for 90 percent of all views

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,291   +192
Staff member

Reaching Internet stardom through YouTube is a dream shared by many of today’s youth yet the harsh reality is that, just like in old Hollywood, your odds of success are quite slim.

According to research by Mathias Bärtl, a professor at Offenburg University of Applied Sciences in Offenburg, Germany, 96.5 percent of people that try to earn a living from YouTube won’t make enough money to crack the poverty line in the US (observed as $12,140 in income per year for a single person or $16,464 for a two-person household).

While it would do wonders for your self-confidence, breaking into the top three percent of most-viewed channels isn’t a guaranteed payday and may only generate around $16,800 per year, Bärtl notes.

Alice Marwick, an assistant professor of communication at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, tells Bloomberg that if you are a series regular on a network TV show, you’re getting a good amount of money yet you can have half a million followers on YouTube and still be working at Starbucks.

If you can make it into the top one percent of creators, however, your prospects can quickly change. Bärtl’s research shows, for example, that in 2016, the top one percent of creators generated anywhere between 2.2 million to 42.1 million views per month. Using a ballpark payout figure of $1 per 1,000 views, it’s easy to see how millions of views can translate into serious income (and that’s not even counting income from third-party sponsorships or endorsements).

As is often the case in life, it’s the top few percent of people that are responsible for doing most of the work and reaping most of the rewards. Bärtl found that in 2006, the top three percent of YouTubers accounted for 63 percent of all views. A decade later in 2016, the top YouTubers received nine out of every 10 views. The bottom 85 percent that started posting in 2016 received a maximum of 458 views per month, Bärtl notes.

Permalink to story.

 
This is a misleading article, as were the ones that dropped on other websites yesterday re: YouTube money.

Sponsored videos, affiliate sales, and using YouTube as a lead generator (part of your sales funnel) are all common strategies to making well over 12K on YouTube. You don't need to be anywhere near the top three percent unless you rely exclusively on YouTube's monetization system (5-second ads, etc).
 
This is a misleading article, as were the ones that dropped on other websites yesterday re: YouTube money.

Sponsored videos, affiliate sales, and using YouTube as a lead generator (part of your sales funnel) are all common strategies to making well over 12K on YouTube. You don't need to be anywhere near the top three percent unless you rely exclusively on YouTube's monetization system (5-second ads, etc).

I thought the article was pretty clear regarding its focus on monetization strictly from Youtube. Sponsorships, affiliate sales, etc would be separate streams of income. The conclusion is sound.
 
I thought the article was pretty clear regarding its focus on monetization strictly from Youtube. Sponsorships, affiliate sales, etc would be separate streams of income. The conclusion is sound.

Not if you’re using YouTube as the sales funnel. If you’re using YouTube to drive sales, by definition you are using your YouTube channel to make money.

Ergo, the articles thus far have been misleading as they deal exclusively with ads served by YouTube using the PPC/PPV model when this is only one of several ways YouTubers are using YouTube to make money.

It creates the perception that you need to be a top channel to make good money. This is incorrect.
 
Back