The US government is spending $2 billion on quantum computing, while taking stock in the companies it funds

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,004   +58
Staff
TL;DR: The US government is taking a more hands-on role in shaping the future of quantum computing, committing billions of dollars in funding while also taking ownership stakes across a group of emerging and established players. The Commerce Department said it plans to distribute about $2 billion to nine quantum computing companies, structuring the deals to include minority equity positions. The move reflects how Washington is approaching early-stage technologies that are still years away from full commercialization but carry significant long-term implications.

IBM is set to receive the largest share of the funding, with $1 billion allocated to the company. Long seen as a frontrunner in quantum development, IBM has been building out both hardware and software systems designed to handle quantum workloads. As part of the agreement, the company will invest an additional $1 billion of its own capital to establish what it calls the nation's first dedicated quantum chip manufacturing facility. The effort will be housed within a newly formed business unit focused specifically on quantum production.

Quantum systems work differently than traditional computers, relying on the behavior of subatomic particles to process information. That approach opens the door to solving certain classes of problems far more efficiently than classical machines, particularly in areas like molecular modeling, optimization, and cryptography. IBM CEO Arvind Krishna said recent protein simulations run on its quantum systems point to early practical use cases, especially in drug discovery.

Krishna compared the current moment in quantum computing to where AI chips stood roughly a decade ago. The slate of deals "is a great statement of confidence that this industry is right around the corner within a couple of years," Krishna told The Wall Street Journal.

The funding is not concentrated on a single technical approach. Instead, the government is spreading investments across companies working on different quantum architectures. GlobalFoundries, for example, will receive $375 million and provide the government with roughly a 1% stake. The semiconductor manufacturer is also launching a new business line dedicated to quantum technologies.

Other recipients include D-Wave Quantum, Rigetti Computing, and Infleqtion, each pursuing distinct methods for building quantum systems. D-Wave focuses on quantum annealing, while Rigetti develops superconducting qubits and Infleqtion works with neutral atom platforms. Most of these companies are expected to receive around $100 million, while startup Diraq is slated for $38 million.

Several of the firms indicated that the government's contribution will come entirely or primarily in the form of equity. D-Wave said its $100 million award would be fully equity-based, and both Rigetti and Infleqtion described similar arrangements.

The funding comes from the 2022 Chips and Science Act, though the inclusion of equity stakes marks a departure from more traditional government support models. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has been pushing for deeper federal involvement in strategic industries, including taking a nearly 10% stake in Intel earlier this year.

By investing across multiple companies and technical approaches, the government is effectively hedging its bets in a field where timelines remain uncertain. A senior Commerce Department official said the agency spread its investments across multiple deals, acknowledging that returns could take years to materialize.

Not everyone is convinced the strategy will pay off. Some analysts argue that quantum computing is still too experimental to justify direct government ownership. "Everybody is excited about quantum because it is the next big thing," said Dana Goward, president of the Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation. "A lot of the expectations and hopes have yet to be realized." At the same time, researchers continue to explore potential applications, including systems that could eventually serve as alternatives to GPS.

Quantum executives say progress is accelerating. Improvements in chip design, qubit performance, and error correction are gradually addressing some of the field's biggest technical hurdles. Increased funding is also helping shorten development timelines, particularly as more specialized manufacturing capabilities are built out.

Additional companies expected to receive funding include Atom Computing, PsiQuantum, and Quantinuum. PsiQuantum raised $1 billion last year from investors including 1789 Capital, a venture firm in which Donald Trump Jr. is a partner.

The deals have not yet been finalized, but they point to a more direct alignment between government policy and the technical direction of quantum computing. Whether that approach will produce commercially viable systems is unclear, but the level of investment suggests the US is not willing to wait to find out.

Permalink to story:

 
Benny once said that "Fascism should rightly be called Corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power."
 
Benny once said that "Fascism should rightly be called Corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power."
That quote is fabricated. It appears in none of Mussolini's writings or recorded speeches, was popularized by the 2006 documentary America: Freedom to Fascism, and traces in print only to Michael Ruppert's 2004 book Crossing the Rubicon — roughly 60 years after Mussolini's death.

The underlying conceptual error: Mussolini's corporazioni were state-created bodies modeled on guilds that coordinated labor, employers, and the state — not private businesses (società). So the quote conflates modern corporations with something quite different.

Crony Capitalism is very bad, but distinct from fascism and socialism (though there is some overlap to each).
 
For most respectable presidential administrations this would be the definition of Conflict of Interest....but since it's Trump, this is just another business day in the corrupted White House.
 
Wait a minute, so the government―our "elected" officials―is spending our tax dollars (because where else does government money come from?) to invest in quantum [insert thing here] and then reaping the benefits of our investments? They aren't using those returns to invest in public infrastructure or the like...

and this is somehow not a massive conflict of interest because, what, "national security"? What happened to serving the "public good"?
 
All countries except Canada and Northern Europe have adopted crony capitalism.
Northern Europe is a hotbed of crony capitalism, where businesses succeed not on merit, but the special favors they receive from government. Case in point the EU:, which punishes foreign firms for acts their local competitors regularly engage in, such as Apple for "promoting its own products and services", or investigating Facebook and TikTok for failing to implement an age-verification system that no European platform has yet implemented either.
 
Last edited:
Wait a minute, so the government―our "elected" officials―is spending our tax dollars (because where else does government money come from?) to invest in quantum [insert thing here] and then reaping the benefits of our investments? They aren't using those returns to invest in public infrastructure or the like...

and this is somehow not a massive conflict of interest because, what, "national security"? What happened to serving the "public good"?

Am I to understand that you think the returns on the equity investments...go directly into politicians pockets, rather than to the US Treasury?
 
So, let me get this straight. Companies sell stock to get working capital to grow. Investors don't "give" them money, but instead are betting that their investment will pay off and have some return for that money "given" to the company.

But the government, who funds these types of things all the time, should just give them the money outright in exchange for the technology. No investment, no guarantees, just fund them as a government research project, like solar (Solyindra) or other companies that end up with the equivalent result of "throwing money out the window".

At the same time, they should not invest in these companies as a vehicle to fund this research.

If it flops, we loose the money anyway. If they succeed, we get some of our original money back as a return on investment that goes back into the government coffers.

And before someone starts crowing about the government "picking winners and losers,:" the government has been doing that for years with regulations, laws, rigged bids, and other hidden levers.

I really don't see the difference other than this MAY end up saving the taxpayer some money.

But I will admit, it is a great cudgel for beating the current administration over the head with in the political realm.
 
Back