The US moves to block most new routers made overseas

The only thing forcing the routers to be made in the US will do is increase their price. It won't make the software on them any more secure or any more well-supported; you won't get more security updates for them and people still won't install them even when they are available.

If you want to fix the security situation, start legislating for standards for the software on them. Things like firmware updates released in response to applicable CVEs, a certain minimum number of years of guaranteed updates, no hard-coded credentials built into the software shared between devices (e.g. a unique default admin password for each device, imprinted on the serial number sticker on the bottom of the device) so that it's not trivial to compromise them when (not if) people don't bother to change these credentials.

Stuff the UK is doing, for example.

What a farce.

Ding; it's the software that matters here, and nothing this does will affect that. All this does is raise costs, again.
 
I run OpenWRT on an N3160, 8GB RAM and 128GB SSD (Samsung 840). I use an Intel chip as 0 and a Realtek 8125 as 1. Massively overpowered for what I need but it's far more powerful than an ARM router and not that much more expensive.

The 3000T is extremely cost effective and good enough for most people.
What is a 3000T??
 
This. Exactly this. You can force companies out of China by putting tariffs on them and other stupid things, but they ain't coming back to America. They will simply move production to the next cheapest place after China. Oh you're going to tariff the next cheapest place too? Guess what, there are 100+ countries where it's cheaper to manufacture anything compared to the US.
Some would benefit from an understanding of past history. In 1960, the US made half of all the manufactured goods in the world, while China made essentially zero ... despite the fact that the labor cost gap between the US and China was larger than it is today.

When you understand exactly why that changed, you'll understand the fallacy in your above reasoning.
 
They are U.S. backdoors.
They do not count.
As someone who doesn't live there, they count for me.
(Yeah I know, not living there means my opinion doesn't count either.)

I run OpenWRT on an N3160, 8GB RAM and 128GB SSD (Samsung 840). I use an Intel chip as 0 and a Realtek 8125 as 1. Massively overpowered for what I need but it's far more powerful than an ARM router and not that much more expensive.

The 3000T is extremely cost effective and good enough for most people.
Can't go wrong for that low of a price :).

More than powerful enough for my needs, the WNDR3700 it replaced was struggling a bit with all the random smart devices wanting a WiFi connection. But the main problem is that I got a new ISP and for whatever reason it refused to communicate at gigabit speeds with the WNDR3700 (c[r]apping out at 100Mbit).
Now I got it adblocking, proper gigabit connections and a stable WiFi connection which I previously lacked.
(including theoretically WiFi 6, but my phone/laptop predate the wifi 6 introduction date...)

And indeed very cost effective, a WiFi card alone costs about the same and in my experience they don't handle serving to many wireless clients very well nor do they tend to have transmit range/reliability comparable to a purpose build device.
 
500$ USA made routers are only allowed ... neat ... good job current administration
What I don't understand is why consumer grade routers are banned, but office grade apparently are just fine. For the record, I only buy routers designed to SOHO standards, with an eye to getting better security options and hardware. Basically, more dependable for overall use including, for example, gaming.
 
Honestly I think the Trump administration people just want to get more bribes.
You've confused them with the Biden Administration. While we don't know precisely why China secretly wired $22M to nine different Biden family members, all of it from offshore shell accounts in fake names, it does explain why Joe pardoned his family for all past and present crimes.
 
No evidence to show this.
Oops! You forget tens of thousands of text messages, emails, bank records, wire transfer receipts, and the sworn testimony of a half-dozen FBI and IRS whistleblowers. See here:


And -- of course -- the most telling evidence of all:

"On January 20, 2025, in his final minutes in office, President Joe Biden issued preemptive, blanket pardons for all past and present felonies and misdemeanors by his brother James Biden, sister-in-law Sara Jones Biden, sister Valerie Biden Owens, brother-in-law John T. Owens, and brother Francis Biden. Biden had earlier issued another unconditional pardon of his son Hunter...."
 
Oops! You forget tens of thousands of text messages, emails, bank records, wire transfer receipts, and the sworn testimony of a half-dozen FBI and IRS whistleblowers. See here:


And -- of course -- the most telling evidence of all:

"On January 20, 2025, in his final minutes in office, President Joe Biden issued preemptive, blanket pardons for all past and present felonies and misdemeanors by his brother James Biden, sister-in-law Sara Jones Biden, sister Valerie Biden Owens, brother-in-law John T. Owens, and brother Francis Biden. Biden had earlier issued another unconditional pardon of his son Hunter...."
None of which has resulted in anything beyond a lot of propaganda ensnaring people like you gullible enough to believe partisan hunting parties.
 
None of which has resulted in anything beyond a lot of propaganda ensnaring people like you gullible enough to believe partisan hunting parties.
It would have resulted in countless felony charges -- had Biden not pardoned his entire extended family to shield them from it. And in doing so, because the first president in US history to ever perform such a corrupt banana-republic style act.
 
Back