This streamer is charging viewers $7.50 to spin her chair in bizarre money-making stunt

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,258   +63
Staff
WTF?! Viewers are reportedly paying $7.50, or 50 yuan, to send Chinese livestreamer Fanqie Jiang Ye spinning in her chair. Clips shared online appear to show people repeatedly paying to keep her chair spinning. The stunt turns a livestream into something viewers can pay to control, rather than simply watch, raising a question familiar to Black Mirror fans: how much control over another person should a payment buy?

Viewers are said to be paying to spin the streamer's chair, not just send a gift or message, though key details remain unclear. The original livestream has not been independently verified, and the available reports do not establish exactly how payments trigger the chair or whether the creator can pause its movement.

The footage also offers little information about the equipment that rotates the chair, the software that receives the paid interactions, or the connection between the two.

We also don't know how the system handles several payments arriving close together. Each interaction reportedly activates a full rotation, but it's unclear how requests are handled while the chair is already moving.

Much of the online reaction has centered on the prospect of paying to control another person's physical performance. Users have compared the stream to Netflix's science-fiction anthology Black Mirror, particularly the episode "Common People."

The Season 7 opener follows Amanda and Mike, a couple who come to depend on a subscription-based technology that keeps Amanda alive. As the service grows more expensive, Mike earns money by hurting and humiliating himself on a livestream for paying viewers.

While the Black Mirror comparison is striking, Jiang Ye's case is certainly less severe. Nevertheless, it raises questions about what a viewer's payment entitles them to. Until the livestream's rules are verified, the footage cannot settle whether viewers are directing an agreed performance or pushing it beyond the performer's limits.

Permalink to story:

 
I don't understand the need to support people that have put zero effort into being a useful member of society, so they wh0re themselves out in some form or another.
 
1) "Control" is quite an exaggeration.

2) It's a voluntary exchange on both sides so why would anyone be upset in any way - let alone morally outraged.

Honestly spinning a chair seems like a higher return than the digital heart other streamers offer for money.
 
I don't understand the need to support people that have put zero effort into being a useful member of society, so they wh0re themselves out in some form or another.
I dont either, which is why I have campaigned against heavy taxation and welfare systems for decades now.

But some people feel the need to feed those who refuse to feed themselves.
 
Back