Agreed that he's entirely visionless - but keeping in that specific context, the company has grown (in $, not innovation). I'd say he has done a stellar job of doing very little while still taking in more money for the company. He's the definition of one of the best lame-duck CEOs.Really Good? No. Terrible? No, but certainly not good. Apple and Microsoft have one thing in common: They both are in desperate need of replacement CEO's.