m4a4
Posts: 3,933 +5,705
Looks like yet another political dumpster fire on TS.
Surprised commenting is not locked yet...
Surprised commenting is not locked yet...
US farmers has been accepting socialist hand outs from the US government for the last 40 yrs. If it wasn't for subsidies 99% of farmers would have failed a long time ago. So why do t you get of your high horse.
You seem to be very desperate to assert that there is no fraud. But how do you know? And there are now over 30 signed affidavits from poll workers admitting to fraudulent practises. Are they all making it up?You're right, something is fishy. One single very particular thing: Trump's claims of fraud.
What tampering? Beg the question much? Where do you get off in assuming that there was fraud? 50 bi-partisan state election committees disagree with you. Do you somehow know more than they do?
Or - are you just part of the internet echo chamber?
Very clever! Now we can refer to "fraud deniers" - as if there is even fraud to deny.Good job Trump. Fraud deniers are just suffering from Trump derangement Syndrome.
I mean anyone with a brain can see that there is something fishy going on somewhere. Who knows who did the tampering but claiming it was really secure was a bit of a dumb move.
You seem to be very desperate to assert that there is no fraud. But how do you know? And there are now over 30 signed affidavits from poll workers admitting to fraudulent practises. Are they all making it up?
I look forward to your courts verdict, I will take their word. Not some desperate yahoo online.
As usual with your posts, you sadly overestimate your ability to play with words. And here underestimate your propensity for being gulled.And there are now over 30 signed affidavits from poll workers admitting to fraudulent practises. Are they all making it up? I look forward to your courts verdict, I will take their word. Not some desperate yahoo online.
Yup, for the damage he's done to our society and to our democratic processes. The leader of truth decay.You people will of course still be blaming Trump long after he's gone.
Nothing is likely to help you at this point, as you apparently don't even understand the terms you're using. But you might consider that the two supreme anti-liberals in history were Hitler and Stalin. Wouldn't you rather be at the opposite pole from them? The middle ground is a liberal society. In fact the only great societies that have survived were / are based on liberal values. Read some history and maybe absorb that.I fully expect bans will start coming to users espousing anything even remotely right-wing, conservative or just anti leftist dogma.
Maybe you should do some research - the subsidies were because the government wanted to ensure the stability of food supply in wartime. Read some history and maybe absorb that.Maybe you should do some research, the subsidies are becuase the government wanted to keep food costs down
Michigan goes to Trump, not Biden.
71% of the precincts in Wayne County Michigan (home to Detroit) reported a higher vote total than they had voters. Based on that, two of the four County Commissioners voted to withhold certifying the results until a full audit was performed. They were immediately inundated with verbal harassment and threats of violence, and then reversed their vote. Just one small example -- and without the additional votes in just that one county, Michigan goes to Trump, not Biden.
As for the article's main conclusion that Krebs was fired for his recent tweet debunking the "Hammer and Scorecard" conspiracy theory, it is of course nonsense. The first new stories that Krebs has been expecting to be fired came out nearly two weeks ago, long before that tweet was even sent. But this is what passes for journalism these days: who cares if its correct or not, as long as it feeds a narrative.
Maybe you should do some research, the subsidies are becuase the government wanted to keep food costs down, farmers could do just fine if there wasn't a cap on the price of food goods, thats the government over reach maninpulating the market and dictating that farmers can't set prices that would pay their bills, so the government has to bail them out, because you want to buy canned beans for 78 cents, when in truth they should be costing you $4
Actually, the biggest element in the story was that the Republican director of homeland cybersecurity said that the election was clean. But better to muddy the waters with a secondary point, right? Except - Trump himself said the the Krebs was fired for stating that fact.As for the article's main conclusion that Krebs was fired for his recent tweet ...
Sorry, but that argument doesn't fly, since discrepancies were also in the absentee vote counts. You can't send in an absentee ballot, then show up on election day to register. Nor does it make sense that, with an overall turnout of 49.6% for all precincts, that these certain districts had over a 100% turnout.Dude... same day voter registration, how is that concept so hard to understand.
"In theory" they should equal? Any time the number of votes counted doesn't equal the number cast, there's a problem. Why not do an audit and see what happened? One person, one vote -- remember?"...discrepancies in certain Detroit precincts between the numbers of voters and the numbers of ballots tabulated. In theory those should be the same, but results that are “out of balance” by small amounts are not unusual and do not generally signify tampering or fraud
Whole story please... The two in question are Republicans. The other two are Democrats. Despite the obvious fact that any miniscule difference in counts was irrelevant to the final result, the former decided to toe the party line - at least briefly - with a delay. Of course everyone criticized them for this stupidity, and of course they found a face-saving way to reverse course back into reality. End of Trump-inspired non-drama. But how different from the way you report it...Two of the four County Commissioners voted to withhold certifying the results until a full audit was performed.
Typical Trump-era FUD, although you're right about "small". Where are all the other, large examples? Links? Numbers? Evidence? Court wins? Anything other than random errors somewhere in 70 million votes?Just one small example ...
It's astonishing how you're able to rationalize what you wish to believe. Krebs did not say the election was "clean", nor would he even be in any position to know. State and county boards oversee voter registration, ballot counting, and every other aspect of the election process. The only thing Krebs has responsibility for is cybersecurity -- protecting voting machines from cyber attacks by foreign adversaries. His statement that the election was "secure" (not "clean") was in that cybersecurity context. And regardless, Krebs has no more or less knowledge of general election integrity than do you or I.Actually, the biggest element in the story was that the Republican director of homeland cybersecurity said that the election was clean.
Once again you're deluding yourself. Trump said no such thing. Trump tweeted that Krebs' tweet was incorrect, period. The media are the ones who made the connection ... despite their having written the earlier stories that said Krebs was already on the chopping block.Except - Trump himself said the the Krebs was fired for stating that fact.
The voice of reason. Of course "counting every vote" in this case means "feeding the Trump fantasy that he lost because of fraud". The problem is not that the count is wrong - nobody wants that - but the unprecedented insinuations (massive national fraud) and unprecedented transition delay.Any time the number of votes counted doesn't equal the number cast, there's a problem. Why not do an audit and see what happened?
How about Georgia? During the recount Monday, 2,000 uncounted votes were found, and 2,600 more on Tuesday. I haven't seen Wednesday's figures yet. How about dead people voting in Nevada -- is that just a "random error" too?Where are all the other, large examples?
Glad to oblige:Court wins?
"In theory" they should equal? Any time the number of votes counted doesn't equal the number cast, there's a problem. Why not do an audit and see what happened? One person, one vote -- remember?
I'd love to see any other business try such a ridiculous excuse. Imagine the military saying "well in theory, the number of weapons we shipped to that base should equal to number we have there -- but if we're off by a few thousand, what does it matter?