We recounted Florida three separate times during the Bush/Gore election, on far less evidence. I didn't hear anyone complaining about the expense of getting it right then. And in any case, I'm sure a recount will cost far less than the Mueller investigation.
Two states, actually. Georgia is one: Trump has already picked up almost 3,000 votes during the recount, and Biden now leads by only 12,000 votes, out of 5 million cast.
That sounds a lot like, "My guy won, so who cares if its accurate?" Is that why you think it was necessary to recount Florida three separate times for Gore, but now believe we shouldn't even recount once? What are you afraid of?
Let me make this clear. There is nothing secure about our voting system. Even if this year was more secure. That is not saying much. Once upon a time there was no choices for counting votes. We have choices now, yet we continue to use old outdated insecure counting methods. I'm surprised our ballots are not still transported by horse back.
Try again that's not a fact, that is an opinion. Just like my opinion thinking ill of the 2008, 2012, and (if you get your way) 2020 elections.
I'm sure you will as you serve under a dictatorship with me.
www.oregonlive.com
Yeah, the only one Trump so far won. How many has he lost so far, 12 or 13 or some number in that range. 10% is not a good batting average. He's not likely to win any more. But what they hey! Trump has a right to court fights even if he is far from likely to win anything by it. It's his brand at stake. He hates looking like a loser.
No. It's 3, as of today. PA, GA, and one of either NV, AZ, or MI. Any of those 3 pushes Trump over 270.
The recount is ongoing, and of the three large batches of uncounted votes found during the recount, somehow all were mostly for Trump. Just a coincidence though, right?
It was China who sent this plague, not God. And China's favored candidate won as a result.
You never tire of being wrong. The campaign won a second case in PA as well, regarding Republican poll watchers which were not allowed to observe the counting process. Most of the remaining cases are either pending at the district level, or pending appeal.
Where have I heard "as of today" before?
I am sure there is a conspiracy in there somewhere.
Do you sign your signature exactly the same way every time? I bet not. Signature matching is more an art, not a science. I am sure that you would not mind that your vote did not count because some poll worker was not an expert in signature matching, right?
Spoken like a true scientist.
Did you actually call the constitutionally-mandated election process a "technicality"? What's even more frightening is that you're not even embarrassed by such a statement. You may have skipped a few years of high school civics, but there is no such thing as a "popular vote winner" in the United States. We live in a republic, not a democracy.
And you never tire of pretending you are always right and should not be questioned.
When my signature doesn't match on a check, the bank calls me to verify I actually signed it. Well over a billion checks were written in the US last year alone -- we can't verify signatures on a far smaller number of ballots?
Ah, changing the argument. Do you seriously think that every single check written in the US goes through a signature verification process?
Maybe not. But in the end those checks are audited. If not the account holder sucks at keeping records and account balancing. That is definitely a stage we don't get as voters.
That would be a balance between democracy and republic? You can't throw out either one without disrupting the balance our forefathers built for us. It's time you democrats learned that, and stop calling the US a straight up democracy. Every time you straight up vote democracy. You are voting for the loss of freedom. That is not how this country was founded.
