Twitter claims it boosted active-user counts in "error" between 2019 and 2021

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,178   +1,424
Staff member
Facepalm: Elon Musk's Twitter acquisition is still not in the bag, and the company's first-quarter financial result might quell the tycoon's enthusiasm over the deal. In addition to substantial negative growth, Twitter admitted to making an error that caused user counts to be higher than the actual numbers for the last three years.

On Thursday, Twitter released its first quarterly financial report for 2022. It claims that despite revenue for Q1 reaching $1.2 billion, the company operated at a loss. Perhaps even more interesting is that the company admitted to accidentally overinflating monetizable daily active user (mDAU) counts. It blamed the error on a change to how it managed user accounts.

"In March of 2019, we launched a feature that allowed people to link multiple separate accounts together in order to conveniently switch between accounts," the report reads. "An error was made at that time, such that actions taken via the primary account resulted in all linked accounts being counted as mDAU. This resulted in an overstatement of mDAU from Q1'19 through Q4'21. "

The mDAU recast only made a difference of about two million users for Q4 20221, but it will be interesting to see how Elon Musk handles this news. The billionaire just offered to purchase Twitter for $46.5 billion. Twitter has accepted the proposal, but the deal still has legal hoops to jump through and stockholder approval. Twitter was not open to an initial bid of $41 billion and prepared itself to defend against a hostile takeover.

Presumably, either party can still back out of the acquisition causing one to wonder if Twitter knew about this "error" before the deal was struck and is only admitting it to shake Musk off its back. Of course, such a tactic would be unethical at best and illegal at worst. Either way, the recast does devalue the company, meaning the ball is now in Musk's court as to how to proceed. However, as far as Twitter is concerned, it is still deal-on.

"As announced on April 25, 2022, we entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by an entity wholly owned by Elon Musk, for $54.20 per share in cash. Upon completion of the transaction, Twitter will become a privately held company."

Twitter also reported a $128 million operating loss for the first quarter. Compared to Q1 2021's $54 million gain, that figure is a 337-percent dip in growth. This decline is also despite revenue being up 16 percent year over year. Twitter blames it on a 35-percent increase in operating costs.

Permalink to story.

 
Posting in an Elon Musk topic.

Anyway, if I had to guess, I'd say I doubt Musk cares, at least not enough to want to back out of the purchase.

That would be pretty funny if Twitter were that desperate not to have Musk buy them that they would be like, "Oh, haha, by the way, actually way less people use the platform than we bragged about before. Bet that makes you want to reconsider, eh?"

FYI Cal Jeffrey the first link in the article leads to a 404.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#1 Twitter and Facebook/Instagram use bots to manufacture (fake) engagement.

#2 If you ever believe a word that comes out of any of these companies you're the fool.

#3 Overstating or understating earnings is no less fraud than lying about engagement to make the stock more desirable. Someone needs to be locked up.
 
Posting in an Elon Musk topic.

Anyway, if I had to guess, I'd say I doubt Musk cares, at least not enough to want to back out of the purchase.

That would be pretty funny if Twitter were that desperate not to have Musk buy them that they would be like, "Oh, haha, by the way, actually way less people use the platform than we bragged about before. Bet that makes you want to reconsider, eh?"

FYI Cal Jeffrey the first link in the article leads to a 404.
This is the link:

https://s22.q4cdn.com/826641620/files/doc_financials/2022/q1/Final-Q1’22-earnings-release.pdf
 
The link has an invalid quote character. It should be using the following HTML encoded unicode quote character instead of a simple quote: ’ (or this ’ quote).
Yikes. We all need to go back to ASCII, the one true text encoding.

Good catch.
 
I'm sure Elon already knows all this dirty **** that Twitter has been doing. Well they have 6 months to clean up all your dirty works before turning it over to Elon.
 
Posting in an Elon Musk topic.

Anyway, if I had to guess, I'd say I doubt Musk cares, at least not enough to want to back out of the purchase.

That would be pretty funny if Twitter were that desperate not to have Musk buy them that they would be like, "Oh, haha, by the way, actually way less people use the platform than we bragged about before. Bet that makes you want to reconsider, eh?"

FYI Cal Jeffrey the first link in the article leads to a 404.

I can just imagine Musk laughing and still buys them and now says "Ok now it's my turn." :)
 
Weren‘t some Twitter users complaining about their follower count going down recently ? I wonder if this is related.

Also curious what the number of bots vs. actual human users is.

What if the purchase offer serves as a forced discovery of what‘s going on at Twitter ?
 
Weren‘t some Twitter users complaining about their follower count going down recently ? I wonder if this is related.

Also curious what the number of bots vs. actual human users is.

What if the purchase offer serves as a forced discovery of what‘s going on at Twitter ?
Oh I think there’s going to be a lot of “discovery” at Twitter now that it’s changed hands. I think a lot more censorship is going on than we thought, it wouldn’t surprise me if there are deep algorithms designed to limit conservative users that go way beyond what we know is happening.
 
Posting in an Elon Musk topic.

Anyway, if I had to guess, I'd say I doubt Musk cares, at least not enough to want to back out of the purchase.

That would be pretty funny if Twitter were that desperate not to have Musk buy them that they would be like, "Oh, haha, by the way, actually way less people use the platform than we bragged about before. Bet that makes you want to reconsider, eh?"

FYI Cal Jeffrey the first link in the article leads to a 404.
Oh he cares if the purchase price can be slashed by half
 
Oh he cares if the purchase price can be slashed by half
But the discrepancy of almost two million users is less than 1 percent of the alleged total number of users. For Q4 2021, it's the difference between 214.7 million users and 216.6 million users. Not a huge difference proportionally.
 
LOL when you admit to federal fraud to try to keep another man who commits fraud for a living from buying your 1's and 0' posted by russian and Chinese bots to fool old people who think people drinking babies blood is a real thing... classic.
 
Last edited:
Back