Undervolted Radeon RX 9070 XT beats the RTX 5080 in real-world gaming benchmarks

DragonSlayer101

Posts: 983   +14
Staff
In context: The Radeon RX 9070 XT stands out as one of the best gaming graphics cards on the market, particularly for those seeking top performance at a great value. While the standard version generally matches the RTX 5070 in most games, DIY modders have discovered that overclocked variants can achieve real-world performance comparable to the RTX 5080 with some fine-tuning.

Testing by renowned overclockers Der8auer and Alva Jonathan shows that undervolting the RX 9070 XT while increasing its power limit can significantly boost clock speeds, leading to a notable performance gain. Undervolting reduces power consumption at a given clock speed. This keeps thermals in check and can enable higher core frequencies without excessive heat buildup.

Both YouTubers had similar results with the undervolted RX 9070 XT. Der8auer used an overclocked PowerColor RX 9070 XT Red Devil for his tests, initially increasing the power limit to 360W and boosting the clock frequency to 3.1GHz.

After undervolting the card by 200mV, he was able to push the clock speed to 3.4GHz, but this configuration proved unstable. Der8auer then reduced the undervolting to 170mV, which resulted in a stable setup. Under these conditions, the card achieved an average of 66fps in Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K Ultra with ray tracing disabled. In comparison, the RTX 5080 achieved 65fps using the same settings, while the RTX 4080 managed only 56fps.

Alva Jonathan used the factory-overclocked ASRock RX 9070 Steel Legend for his tests. After similar undervolting and power adjustments, the card reached a stable overclock frequency comparable to Der8auer's PowerColor setup, resulting in a 10 percent fps improvement.

Despite the significant performance boost from undervolting, it's not all positive news for enthusiasts. Overclocking the core clock, memory clock, and voltage of the RX 9070 XT remains a frustrating endeavor. Der8auer's testing suggests that overclocking the memory clock actually results in slower performance compared to stock settings, leading him to conclude that "overclocking is completely broken on the RX 9070 XT."

This limited overclocking headroom implies that the OC models are likely already operating near their architectural limits. However, it is still impressive that the $600-$800 RX 9070 XT OC units can compete on even terms with the $1,000 RTX 5080 with just a few tweaks. Now, if AMD can only ensure steady supply and curb the excessive markups by retailers.

Permalink to story:

 
Just proves that Blackwell is the worst generation Nvidia ever delivered.

There is a reason why they presented these misleading slides during their CES presentation.


nvidia-geforce-rtx-5090-performance-chart.jpg
 
Just proves that Blackwell is the worst generation Nvidia ever delivered.

There is a reason why they presented these misleading slides during their CES presentation.


nvidia-geforce-rtx-5090-performance-chart.jpg
If you tune the 5080 you can get more performance too… apples to oranges…

While the article is a nice reminder that you can get “free” performance with a bit of work, it does not magically make the 9070 as good as a 5080.
 
I managed to get a 9070xt and mine doesn't undervolt nearly that well. I tried a -100mv offset to check and it will run benchmarks, but crashes in Avowed (what I'm playing at the moment.) Unless it's 100% stable and a common result, I don't think these stories mean much. I'm not going to run a card that might crash at any time just to get 10% more performance.
 
I managed to get a 9070xt and mine doesn't undervolt nearly that well. I tried a -100mv offset to check and it will run benchmarks, but crashes in Avowed (what I'm playing at the moment.) Unless it's 100% stable and a common result, I don't think these stories mean much. I'm not going to run a card that might crash at any time just to get 10% more performance.


These are just fun stories , probably 98% plus won't even touch this stuff, another 80% ( source again - I made it the F up ) will not really know how to get best bang for bucks settings for a game - that will increase on Nvidia - as so much confusing terminology- fake frame gen , dlss etc ,etc ignoring all the other settings
 
Some pretty lame comments here in failing to understand the value equation from AMD and how a $600 card can get close to $1000++ card (be real there are none at $1000). 5080 OC'd, UV'd will still be extremely bad value, AMD will just get better in value.

Amazing how many excuses people will find to belittle AMD.
 
Some pretty lame comments here in failing to understand the value equation from AMD and how a $600 card can get close to $1000++ card (be real there are none at $1000). 5080 OC'd, UV'd will still be extremely bad value, AMD will just get better in value.

Amazing how many excuses people will find to belittle AMD.
This article has nothing to do with that… it’s simply how you can undervolt/overclock a card to make it faster… which is great but… it doesn’t make the card a $1000 one!

First off, this was an OC’d card to begin with - so it wasn’t $600 - it was probably $700-50ish… second off, you can OC/undervolt a 5080 as well…
 
If you tune the 5080 you can get more performance too… apples to oranges…

While the article is a nice reminder that you can get “free” performance with a bit of work, it does not magically make the 9070 as good as a 5080.

Both at MSRP, 9070 XT is better. 5080 shouldn't even exist.
 
Value - wise maybe…. But just performance-wise, the 5080 is vastly superior.

Nvidia can charge pretty much whatever they want because they know this….
With differences ranging from -5% to +25% it is not "vastly superior". 5080 is a product with mid-end characteristics (16GB Vram) dressed up as high-end.
In the real world, you're looking at a product that costs more than twice as much and offers on average 20%, depending on what you play, 0% extra performance compared to the RX 9070 XT.
 
With differences ranging from -5% to +25% it is not "vastly superior". 5080 is a product with mid-end characteristics (16GB Vram) dressed up as high-end.
In the real world, you're looking at a product that costs more than twice as much and offers on average 20%, depending on what you play, 0% extra performance compared to the RX 9070 XT.
15% better is vastly superior… and that doesn’t include ray tracing , which the 5080 dominates…assuming they were the same price - which they’re not.

The 9070 xt is the better buy - but it’s clearly the inferior card. This isn’t really a debate.

Oh… and $1000 isn’t twice $650…
 
15% better is vastly superior… and that doesn’t include ray tracing , which the 5080 dominates…assuming they were the same price - which they’re not.

The 9070 xt is the better buy - but it’s clearly the inferior card. This isn’t really a debate.

Oh… and $1000 isn’t twice $650…

15% is pathetic for the price. Nvidia screwed up royally this time (well, again), just that AMD hasn't, for a change.
 
15% is pathetic for the price. Nvidia screwed up royally this time (well, again), just that AMD hasn't, for a change.
Agreed… but clearly nvidia hasn’t screwed up…. They’ll all get sold… AMD will have to make do with the scraps… which should be enough to turn a profit as well - there just aren’t enough GPUs around!
 
Back