Universal Pictures adds a warning to its movies: "do not use to train AI"

midian182

Posts: 11,726   +177
Staff member
Why it matters: If anything illustrates the modern times that we live in, it's movies featuring a warning about not using them to train AI. Universal Pictures has added the message in the end credits of its new films to scare off AI companies, which often train their systems on content without compensating the IP holders.

Anyone dedicated enough to watch the end credits of How to Train Your Dragon in theaters when it arrived in June may have noticed a warning stating that Universal's titles "may not be used to train AI." The same message appears at the end of Jurassic World Rebirth and Bad Guys 2, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

The warning comes with extra text that reads: "This motion picture is protected under the laws of the United States and other countries," adding that "Unauthorized duplication, distribution or exhibition may result in civil liability and criminal prosecution."

In some countries, the warning includes a citation of a 2019 European Union copyright law that allows creators to opt out of having their work used in scientific research by reserving their rights.

There has been controversy over AI companies using media for training purposes without consent since the systems first gained widespread use. Image generators have been sued several times for their ability to recreate copyrighted images or videos that appear to come directly from movies and TV shows. Disney and Universal sued Midjourney over it reproducing characters from Shrek, Ratatouille and The Lego Movie that look so similar to the films that it's assumed they were trained on the copyrighted work without permission.

AI firms usually turn to the fair use argument in these cases, which allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the rights holder. Authors have lost cases against Anthropic and Meta because of the fair use law, but AI companies could be held liable if they illegally downloaded or made copies of movies for training purposes.

Ultimately, a warning about not using a movie for AI training might do little to stop AI giants that are worth billions and backed by big tech, but it acts as another reminder that copyright holders aren't just going to lie down and let their properties be exploited – not without compensation, at least.

Permalink to story:

 
AI Companies:
rundown3.jpg
 
"This motion picture is protected under the laws of the United States and other countries," adding that "Unauthorized duplication, distribution or exhibition may result in civil liability and criminal prosecution."

Yep this will surely work especially for Countries that hate the West. To them everything is fair use.
 
So far the few court cases on the matter have placed using copyright material for training by itself falls under fair use in the US; so this disclaimer is going to have no legal power unless those cases get overturned.
 
When the legal warning at the end of a movie isn’t for pirates anymore, but for neural networks, you know we’ve officially entered the cyberpunk timeline.
 
Obviously the IP owners have copyright protections from AI reproducing their content, whether they include this warning/disclaimer or not.

Beyond that, how much leeway does the law provide them in making up arbitrary further limitations? Could my next DVD include warnings that it is only valid for weekend watching, or there may be no more than 3 family members in the living room?

Technology will eventually make it possible to limit almost anything on any product. But I'm not sure that it should be enforceable (or maybe allowed in the first place.)
 
Back