nosebleedXD
Posts: 227 +0
uhh ima just use my old hd and dvd drive, and like i said from the beginning, this was originally just an upgrade of a gfx
this is way over my budget =[
this is way over my budget =[
Can you link me to any raybay? I'm not looking to prolong the argument, it's just that it's related to my field of study, so I'd be interested to read any of these studies. I've tried Google, but most of the information isn't explained with enough detail.raybay said:There are plenty of studies which disprove the argument about the efficiency of two rails.
Rage_3K_Moiz said:Can you link me to any raybay? I'm not looking to prolong the argument, it's just that it's related to my field of study, so I'd be interested to read any of these studies. I've tried Google, but most of the information isn't explained with enough detail.
What marketing BS! Anyone with experience in electronics can tell you that isolated power only occurs in superconductive materials. All PSUs below 1kW do not have truly separate rails with separate transformers feeding them. There's usually one transformer that delivers the power, which is split across two rails. This is why the maximum combined amperage of both rails is less than if you were to add their individual maximum amps together.PC Power & Cooling said:Here are the facts: A large, single 12-volt rail (without a 240VA limit) can transfer 100% of the 12-volt output from the PSU to the computer, while a multi-rail 12-volt design has distribution losses of up to 30% of the power supply's rating. Those losses occur because power literally gets "trapped" on under-utilized rails. For example, if the 12-volt rail that powers the CPU is rated for 17 amps and the CPU only uses 7A, the remaining 10A is unusable, since it is isolated from the rest of the system.
Since the maximum current from any one 12-volt rail of a multiple-rail PSU is limited to 20 amps (240VA / 12 volts = 20 amps), PCs with high-performance components that draw over 20 amps from the same rail are subject to over-current shutdowns. With power requirements for multiple processors and graphics cards continuing to grow, the multiple-rail design, with its 240VA limit per rail, is basically obsolete.
Again, BS. No video card can draw 180W on its own AFAIK. And as I stated before, the whole point of having separate rails is to have the video cards be on a dedicated rail, so as not to overload the rail(s) supplying the rest of the system.Still, a good single rail unit will beat a dual rail unit because:
lets say u have dual rails with 15 amps each. if you vid card uses all 15 amps, you will now overload ur PSU and there will be issues.
if you had a 30 amp single rail PSU then that issue wouldnt be there.
You stated efficiency as being worse for a multi-rail PSU, not stability. Anyways, let's just drop this.Dr. Vader said:That's why if you read the whole thing, it said that the only reason for multi-rail PSU's was for stability.