US Army backs humanoid robot with ballistic protection for future battlefield missions

midian182

Posts: 12,065   +184
Staff member
Forward-looking: China isn't the only superpower investigating how humanoid robots will be deployed as part of its armed forces. The US Army has just named five companies as winners of the xTechHumanoid competition, which looks at ways these machines can be utilized in future military operations. One of them, a humanoid robot called Alex, has a distinctly early Terminator feel about it --- it even features ballistic protection.

Autonomy and AI are becoming increasingly important elements of today's military forces. We're seeing the likes of drones, turrets, and even vehicles such as aircraft and boats operating with minimal human control.

The next step in that admittedly concerning evolution is the use of humanoid robots.

In 2023, the Humanoid Community of Collaboration (HCoC) was established. This Joint Force organization is designed to advance the technical development and operational integration of humanoid robot capabilities across the US Department of Defense and military.

The Army FUZE xTech program – an Army initiative that runs prize competitions to scout and accelerate dual-use and commercial technologies for soldiers – partnered with HCoC for xTechHumanoid.

The competition saw 103 proposals, with the five winners announced after they were evaluated by military leaders and technical experts.

The winners included two different power systems, sensitive fingertip tactile sensors, software, and Alex the humanoid robot.

The work of non-profit research institute the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, Alex is powered entirely by custom, highly backdriveable, powerful quasi-direct drive actuators, which are said to allow for highly efficient, natural motions.

The robot has 29 joints to make it more flexible, while the Army highlights its ballistic protection and hybrid autonomy combining AI and human control for complex and dangerous missions.

"Humanoid robots are part of a broader autonomy push to increase the depth and breadth of robotic platforms and components industry can provide for a range of missions," said US Army Chief Technology Officer Dr. Alex Miller. "We are identifying the problems, mission needs, and opportunities to enable our formations with the right mix of tools. xTech is our method of surveying the industry landscape and fast-tracking promising technology rather than falling victim to years-long studies."

It's not just the US that wants the battlefields of the future to be packed with humanoid robots. Earlier this month, Reuters reported that it had reviewed more than 100 Chinese military procurement notices, academic studies, patents, official publications, government records, and defense-company materials. It found that the country is accelerating research into the robots' military uses and planning for their eventual wartime deployment.

Permalink to story:

 
Two of the most untrusted countries sharing views on military weapons that would potentially serve to fight each other in a future.

When would they realize that military strategy conversations between them are as forbidden as talking about freedom of speech.
 
They don’t really work though. Battery alone would prevent them being fielded in most places for ling periods
 
Compared to the engineering challenge of tracking down and killing people in combat, you think heat and cold are going to stop this?
Yes. Batteries don’t like hot or cold environments and if you’d been to one you’d know how bad it is. It’ll struggle with uneven terrain and targeting too but if it can’t last an hour without the battery or electronics piling in due to heat or cold what’s the point?
 
By far the biggest advantage to a ground war will be Americas troops. Our people.
With both sides deploying robots to fight, China will WHOOP US LIKE OLD MULES.

Full stop.
 
By far the biggest advantage to a ground war will be Americas troops. Our people.
With both sides deploying robots to fight, China will WHOOP US LIKE OLD MULES.

Full stop.
American trips would be more a danger to each other if history says anything about it
 
The Iran war and the Ukraine war are both showing that cheap drones and missiles are the way wars are going. I'm guessing the American defence industry didn't get the memo as these robot things cost $500K each, even the "cheap" Patriot missile is $2m and God alone knows how much the Trump battleship might cost.
 
They could reduce the price by deleting the tacky gold plating on the hull and superstructure, and cutting back on the decorations in the crew ballroom.
 
Yes. Batteries don’t like hot or cold environments and if you’d been to one you’d know how bad it is. It’ll struggle with uneven terrain and targeting too but if it can’t last an hour without the battery or electronics piling in due to heat or cold what’s the point?

The robot company's stock price? :(
 
They have come to the conclusion that young men are no longer going to waste their lives on meaningless wars that have nothing to do with them, the UK FAFO and now try to shame young men into fighting their wars while they kept hating and demonizing them.

People are now aware of the propaganda that led to senseless deaths and a no longer going to listen to their governments telling them who their enemies are.
 
The Iran war and the Ukraine war are both showing that cheap drones and missiles are the way wars are going. I'm guessing the American defence industry didn't get the memo as these robot things cost $500K each, even the "cheap" Patriot missile is $2m and God alone knows how much the Trump battleship might cost.
The only way you win a war is to put boots on the ground....or wipe your opponent off the map entirely. Anything else is just equivalent to throwing rocks at each other until you run out of rocks.
 
Last edited:
Unless there are ways to remotely control them behind a computer, the amount of friendly fire that comes from these things is going to be unpredictable.
The US has a clear advantage here. They mastered blue on blue aeons ago. ;)
 
The only way you win a war is to put boots on the ground....or wipe your opponent off the map entirely. Anything else is just equivalent to throwing rocks at each other until you run out or rocks.
America lost this war the moment it started. The only country that hasn't realised this yet is America. It's bizarre that America with the most expensive military in the world has somehow managed to lose pretty much every war it's been engaged in since WWII. In the Gulf it's now lost 20 of it's bases.

Putting troops on the ground would be suicide for America - the casualties would be appalling and I'm sure Iran would be happy to broadcast public executions of troops captured. Using nuclear bombs on a country that you've invaded because you suspect they have nuclear bombs just doesn't seem very clever to me.

America lost the moral war by initially starting this war and then by targeting civilian ships, infrastructure, schools and wedding parties. On the other hand, Iran has been very well "behaved" and limited their attacks to military targets. If they wanted to play dirty then they could easily destroy all the countries in the Gulf by hitting their desalination plants. It would be more difficult, but not impossible, to hit refineries in America. I guess they could always just land 100 snipers somewhere in America and then replicate the beltway sniper actions in red states. I'm sure, if they wanted, they could also use the nuclear "dust" to create a small dirty bomb. Thankfully they've been playing nice.

Financially it must also be hard on the American tax payer who is spending around $2b a day to be there but no-one knows what America is trying to achieve in this war. Maybe Trump just gets kick backs from the American arms industry and from American oil companies?
 
Last edited:
Yes. Batteries don’t like hot or cold environments and if you’d been to one you’d know how bad it is. It’ll struggle with uneven terrain and targeting too but if it can’t last an hour without the battery or electronics piling in due to heat or cold what’s the point?
Troop transport shows up, unloads killer robots, then loads them back in afterwards.

You're thinking they have to be unsupported infantry which is not the case.
 
Back