User backlash spurs AMD to clarify "maintenance mode" driver updates for Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 1,918   +58
Staff
Cutting corners: AMD's decision to shift RDNA 1 and RDNA 2 GPUs into a more limited support cycle isn't just a footnote in driver release notes – it's a real-world test of how long modern graphics cards can remain viable. The company now says owners will continue receiving fixes and optimizations "as needed," but that leaves open questions about game performance, feature parity with RDNA 3 and 4, and how this strategy stacks up against Nvidia's longer-term support model. As new titles and driver updates land over the coming months, users will find out whether "maintenance mode" is a minor adjustment – or the beginning of a slow fade for millions of still-popular Radeon cards.

AMD has revised its approach to software support for its RDNA 1 and RDNA 2 graphics cards, following criticism from PC gamers and industry observers after the company initially announced it was moving these GPUs into a so-called maintenance mode.

While AMD previously indicated its focus would shift to the latest RDNA 3 and 4 architectures, the company clarified in a statement to Tom's Hardware that owners of older graphics hardware will still receive targeted updates – albeit on a more limited basis.

Update: One more clarification:

According to AMD, maintenance mode for the Radeon RX 5000 and RX 6000 series will not mean an immediate end to all game optimizations. After backtracking and clarifying, AMD says that new features, bug fixes, and optimizations will still be provided "as required by market needs" for these GPUs.

However, AMD did not elaborate on what would qualify as such needs or how frequently users can expect updates. The repeated clarification comes after concerns that this "maintenance mode" status would relegate a relatively modern generation of Radeon GPUs to only critical security patches and bug fixes moving forward.

This policy shift impacts a large segment of AMD's user base, including both desktop and laptop owners. The affected GPUs were launched between July 2019 and late 2020. The Radeon RX 5700 XT and RX 5700, for example, debuted in mid-2019, while the RX 6000 series – including the still-popular Radeon 6700 XT – has remained a mainstay on Valve's Steam Hardware Survey as recently as September 2025.

The implications go beyond the desktop. Many of the most popular handheld and compact gaming devices – including the Steam Deck and Asus ROG Ally – are built on RDNA 2 chips and could now also facing limited game optimization going forward.

These handheld gaming PCs, which depend even more on regular driver updates to squeeze out stable frame rates from mobile hardware, could be left behind in the wake of fresh releases or major esports updates. Meanwhile, Linux gamers are less affected, as Valve develops and optimizes its own Vulkan drivers for the Steam Deck, separate from AMD's Windows driver development.

AMD's shift leaves RDNA 1 and RDNA 2 users with a more stable dedicated driver branch, but removes their spot in the frequent, monthly game-ready update cycle. While security and bug fixes will continue, new performance features – such as the latest FSR or frame-generation enhancements – are now reserved for RDNA 3 and newer cards. This differs from Nvidia's approach, which has historically maintained game optimizations and security updates for older GPUs several years beyond their launch windows.

In addition to questions over driver support, AMD also addressed confusion regarding USB Type-C functionality in its newer RX 7900 series GPUs. After an inaccurate statement in its Adrenalin Edition 25.10.2 driver release notes, the company confirmed that there would be no change to USB-C compatibility in this update. The error was due to a documentation mistake.

For now, owners of RDNA 1 and RDNA 2-based Radeon products can expect continued, but more narrowly targeted, driver updates as needed. Whether this approach is sufficient to address user concerns and how it will compare to support policies from Nvidia and other rivals will likely become clearer over the coming months as new games and driver updates are released.

Permalink to story:

 
I mean, there is a limit on how optimized things can get. If they aren't optimized by no then several more years isn't going to help. As long as they receive security updates and support new games, I don't really see what the issue is.
 
I mean, there is a limit on how optimized things can get. If they aren't optimized by no then several more years isn't going to help. As long as they receive security updates and support new games, I don't really see what the issue is.
Optimizations are applied on a per game basis, not a per API basis.

If you dont see what the issue is...go look at games that released just before rDNA3 did, then games between the launch and december, and look at how rDNA2 performance deteriorated. The 6800xt went from a 3080 competitor to a 3070 competitor in less then a month.

It takes only a few minute sto apply these settings. There is no excuse, especially when nVidia is still doing so for the RTX 2000s, which are a year older than rDNA1, and just dropped support for Maxwell, which is 11 years old.
 
How are they gonna make you buy new cards, if they keep updating drivers etc..? Poor old AMD. Remember -AMD is your friend.
 
This has always been the way with Radeon compared to Nvidia. AMD don't like spending money on products they have already sold. But I'm glad someone is finally calling it out (Thankyou Steve!). Although im not holding my breath, AMD is just another multibillion-dollar American tech corporation. They don't care about you at all they just want your money.

I mean, there is a limit on how optimized things can get. If they aren't optimized by no then several more years isn't going to help. As long as they receive security updates and support new games, I don't really see what the issue is.
Most of a GPU driver update is specific optimizations for new games, on top of bug fixes and feature updates. You can run new games on older drivers, but they won't run very well at all. If you purchased a 5700XT over an RTX2080 and AMD dropped the 5700XT, you would see an enormous performance gulf in new games in favour of the RTX2080. If the 5700XT isn't dropped they would probably perform similarly.

If I owned a 5700XT I think I would be quite upset about this. It's not that old a card and you would expect to be able to play modern games on it.


So much for AMDs "fine wine" lol.
 
Last edited:
You guys SPECULATED that AMD`s "MAINTENANCE MODE" was "END OF LIFE" status...

You made a big story over a NON-ISSUE to capitalize on donations and ad revenue by trending, over providing factual information.

You made that mess, not AMD...
 
That’s an incredibly short time. RDNA 1/2 aren’t even that old! For crying out loud, Nvidia just announced the end of driver support for Maxwell GPUs—Maxwell! That’s a 2014 architecture.
Arhmmmm... Pascal was also included... typical NVDesinformation...
 
If I owned a 5700XT I think I would be quite upset about this. It's not that old a card and you would expect to be able to play modern games on it.

So much for AMDs "fine wine" lol.
It is a 2019 card... and spawn more years than a full generation of console already.

And anyway, you are propagating fud over a NON-ISSUE!
It is not an issue, it is not existing, it is not factual!
This whole farce just put in context how desperate for content the content creators have become just for trending for ad revenue and donations.
 
It is a 2019 card... and spawn more years than a full generation of console already.

And anyway, you are propagating fud over a NON-ISSUE!
It is not an issue, it is not existing, it is not factual!
This whole farce just put in context how desperate for content the content creators have become just for trending for ad revenue and donations.
Which part is the lie? which part is "non-factual"

I personally would fully expect a 2019 card to be receiving updates. Thats only 5.5 years ago. Nvidia are cutting support for Maxwell this year, which was released in 2014. If Nvidia can support their products for that long, then so can AMD.

I have noticed that the tech content creators are dealing with hugely reduced viewing numbers, but I don't think they would start making things up. I might suggest to them that they should become a bit more positive about tech products. Im done hearing reviewers complain about pricing for example.
 
It's an absurd move when while not state of the art, RDNA2 video cards are still being widely sold brand new, not to mention AM4 Ryzen G CPUs with GCN5 graphics (5600GT isn't even 2 years old), were these about to be sunsetted too?

I don't buy it that it was a misunderstanding. AMD clearly backpedaled and went into damage control mode after the backlash was probably way more intense and widespread than they expected. Now everyone will have to wait and see if they'll actually honor it, or it was just lip service.
 
If I owned a 5700XT I think I would be quite upset about this. It's not that old a card and you would expect to be able to play modern games on it.
I’d be surprised if there’s that many people still running the 5700 XT to be honest.

That card had fundamental issues, easily the most problematic GPU I’ve ever dealt with, random bluescreens, random performance drops, could decode things sometimes, sometimes it couldn’t.

After literally a year of trying and failing to make it somewhat reliable, it turns out it’s just the architecture had some fundamental flaws that software can only sorta get around, move to the 6000 series onwards if you want reliability.
 
It is a 2019 card... and spawn more years than a full generation of console already.

And anyway, you are propagating fud over a NON-ISSUE!
It is not an issue, it is not existing, it is not factual!
This whole farce just put in context how desperate for content the content creators have become just for trending for ad revenue and donations.

Your whole posts put into context how desperate you are for attention. AMD clearly stated to PCGamesHardware.de that they were only going release security or critical fixes to RDNA1/2 from now on. This is fact.

You can have your opinion that this overblown but it does make a fact.
 
For anyone who says we have no voice, this shows that, with enough pressure, the pro-consumers can influence outcomes. Thanks, Steve (and everyone else)!

Keep pushing back!
 
AMD once again snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Just keep optimizing for your older cards like Nvidia does.

ALL they have to do is stay quiet while Nvidia makes fools of themselves.
In the bigger picture, it's irrational to expect monopolies and duopolies to provide adequate competition and thus adequate performance per dollar.

AMD isn't even functioning as a duopolist, as it chose to hand the higher-end and high end of gaming to Nvidia.

People can chatter forever about what Nvidia and AMD do but what won't happen until there is true capitalist competition is for consumers to be able to buy what they deserve.
 
Just keep optimizing for your older cards like Nvidia does.
Why? Given their supposed market share almost no one uses them. So why should they keep optimizing for a product so few people supposedly use?

Don't you see the dichotomy here between the low Radeon market share people love to quote and over the level of backlash this decision received?
That’s an incredibly short time. RDNA 1/2 aren’t even that old! For crying out loud, Nvidia just announced the end of driver support for Maxwell GPUs—Maxwell! That’s a 2014 architecture.
5 and 7 years respectively. Yes Maxwell was still "supported", but I very much doubt that it received any game specific optimizations either in the last five years. It was already essentially in "maintenance mode". The only difference is that Nvidia kept it quiet to avoid this exact backlash.

So to me there are quite a few takeaways from this whole debacle:
1. There's a gulf between what people claim they want and what they actually do or buy.
2. People demand higher performing cards to receive longer support than slower performing cards. Otherwise people would be up in arms over the fact that low end Pascal cards released 4 years after the initial 2016 date get their support ended the same day that the cards released in 2016 based on the same architecture.
3. People claim they want long 5+ year support, but actually swap cards generally every 4-5 years (based on HUB's own channel poll).
4. Based on market share most people own Nvidia and yet they're the loudest voices criticizing this despite not owning an affected AMD card. A convenient news to dunk on AMD. These people dont really care about RDNA1 and 2 users.
5. People expect the support for a product to last 5+ years from the last card released/sold and not the first card released into the market. However no company operates this way. Even Nvidia ends support for an architecture the same day for all released cards. Even if those cards released 4 years apart.
6. People dont understand the difference between maintenance mode and end of support.
 
Back