There is nothing wrong with your personal preference. What's wrong is the slew of unbased Apple insults that came right after that.What grinds my gears is the iSheep not understanding I don't like Apple products for my own unique reasons. It is my personal preference.
Apple phones cost the same as Android flagships. So, in other words, you're saying "you spend your money wrong, Android is the only right way to spend your money". Or, even more accurately, "stop liking what I don't like".I don't give an iCrap that you overspend on your products
It's a shame, though. You'll be a much less unpleasant and arrogant forum user the day you begin to understand that people don't want to pay just for big (and mostly pointless) spec numbers. Apple offers higher build quality, a more user-friendly OS (Android is miles behind iOS and Windows Phone in that aspect), a more controlled environment (which, for normal people who are not "power users", is a good thing) and the status associated with the brand (the simple fact you think that is not important shows a complete lack of understanding of human nature). It's a perfectly valid approach.
Android, on the other hand, comes in larger variety, more price ranges, with better specs and much higher versatility (and, by consequence, complexity). If you want that, that's completely fine. But that does NOT mean it's the only approach that has value, it does NOT warrant all the pointless criticism Apple get from people like you and many others on this site.
Again, reading comments like yours is exactly as annoying as seeing people fervorously supporting everything Apple does and waiting in line to get the new model on day one. You're not any better than the "iSheep" you love to criticize.
I really don't think so man, I think that is some myth that people that hate Apple want to continue. I really don't see this happening in my every day life.On the the other side of that coin, there are people that BUY Apple products because it is "cool" and "trendy" to do so. *****s that will pay 2.5 to 3 times the cost of some product just because it says APPLE on it.
TL;DR: Value is subjective. If you don't understand this, you're probably the one being had.
This is an easy one... Fools driving in the inside lane of a road with 2 or more lanes in either direction when they aren't passing. Inside lane is for passing, outside lane is for going slow like all of you love to do in the inside lane (otherwise known as the FAST lane). In my state of Arizona it is a law, one that nobody understands or abides. Why you ask? I'll tell you why. Because it costs $20 to get your license and all you have to do is drive around the block, stop at a few stop signs and pull off a three-point turn without killing anyone and boom... here's your license, go ahead and drive the biggest SUV you can and while you're at it hover in the fast lane while all the other surrounding lanes are passing you going about 10+ mph faster than you.
The fast lane; not the speed limit lane, not the I'm going far so I'll stay "out of the way" over here lane... get the hell out of my way before I follow you to your destination and take a large poop on your hood.
To make matters worse, I've lived in Europe (England, Spain, Holland, France) and seen how they drive over there. People make room for others, they drive in the appropriate lane and somehow it works out. Puts the morons here in the US (for sure in my state) to shame, and I wish I could drill this simple concept into the otherwise air occupied space in their brains. Instead of educating the morons, we just keep making the roads wider so at some point you see 4 or 5 mentally challenged individuals all driving next to one-another and you can't get by and it's 11pm!!!! This is a situation that should not exist, and it wouldn't were it not for the lack of a proper driving test and respect for the privilege that is driving an automobile.
That's what grinds my gears.
Really? I would have thought that the word "personal" would have been a dead giveaway?
Hypothetical case:
"I WANT a budget Core i3 with unlocked multiplier and a TDP to fully utilize it - therefore Intel need to make it - it should also have 16 cores 'cos I NEED CORES because [uses single threaded application as example]"
I'm talking about individual posters, you're talking about a group. Group individual posters and you may have a broad base for consensus, but the individual requirements wont be identical.
I'd also add that many of these wish lists and personal must haves don't actually conform in any way to real life/real world economics or technology development.
Something else that I should have added to my list of peeves - people who ascribe motivation based upon little or no actual evidence.
And for the record, OS usage/distain/acceptance/whatever is largely a subjective affair when the software functions as intended. Whatever my experience is, I recognise it as personal to my usage and don't spend a whole lot of time trying to convince others that my subjective experience warrants more attention than someone else's subjective experience.....as for Win8...New build and MS offered me W8 Pro for $39.99. Count me in. Thanks for taking the time to check out my system specs before beginning the baiting- I'm sure the site owners appreciate the extra page clicks.
Long-standing legal battle between Apple and Samsung: YesInstead of making their prices competitive or actually making a better product they just sue the living daylights out of anyone who tries to compete with them.
No, actually it was tech in general, but since I'm more hardware orientated I tend to notice the posters who think that Intel, AMD, Nvidia and the other IHV's owe it to them to put out personalised SKU's - hence the example I supplied.but your first sentence was pretty much a dead giveaway that you had Windows 8 in the back of your mind.
Actual length of legal battle: 2 years 8 monthsLong-standing legal battle between Apple and HTC: No
Actual length of legal battle: 6 years 5 monthsLong-standing legal battle between Apple and Microsoft: No
Actual length of legal battle (Apple countersuit): 1 year 6 monthsLong-standing legal battle between Apple and Nokia: No
Actual length of legal battle: 4 years and countingLong-standing legal battle between Apple and Motorola: No
If we fact checked as well as "Guest", we'd want to remain anonymous too!People who hide behind guest accountslol
First, I don't see how hiding behind usernames is better than hiding behind "guest".People who hide behind guest accountslol![]()
Individuality! No personalization!First, I don't see how hiding behind usernames is better than hiding behind "guest".
Second, I don't see how having a username would change anything on the points I have made here.
Your not forced to buy it.What drives me nuts is the rate at which new products come out, making the existing ones look old or obsolete.Why can't we all just have a global 'New Products Release Summer' every 4 years or so, so we can get on with our lives for a while and then take a summer easy to pause and refresh and upgrade to what we need at that time and then get on with our lives again. I know I can do this even now - there's no reason I shouldn't wait 4 years, but them new products in my face every single day is just PLAIN MADDENING I TELL YA!
First, I don't see how hiding behind usernames is better than hiding behind "guest".
Second, I don't see how having a username would change anything on the points I have made here.
Long-standing legal battle between Apple and Samsung: Yes
Long-standing legal battle between Apple and HTC: No
Long-standing legal battle between Apple and Sony: No
Long-standing legal battle between Apple and LG: No
Long-standing legal battle between Apple and Motorola: No
Long-standing legal battle between Apple and Nokia: No
Long-standing legal battle between Apple and Dell: No
Long-standing legal battle between Apple and HP: No
Long-standing legal battle between Apple and Lenovo: No
Long-standing legal battle between Apple and Acer: No
Long-standing legal battle between Apple and Microsoft: No
Long-standing legal battle between Apple and Google: No
Seems to me like yet another case of confirmation bias which is does not represent reality.
You know what grinds my gears. People who hide behind guest accounts who post information with no supporting evidence to back it up.
on the other side of that, there are people who will buy ANDROID just to be cool with there "apple hating" friends just to be cool even if they have never owned an idevice.. If you buy something to be "cool", you are doing it wrong.The tendency of some people to hate everything related to Apple, just because it's "cool" to do so in certain environments.
On the the other side of that coin, there are people that BUY Apple products because it is "cool" and "trendy" to do so. *****s that will pay 2.5 to 3 times the cost of some product just because it says APPLE on it.
Apple phones cost the same as Android flagships. So, in other words, you're saying "you spend your money wrong, Android is the only right way to spend your money". Or, even more accurately, "stop liking what I don't like".
It's a shame, though. You'll be a much less unpleasant and arrogant forum user the day you begin to understand that people don't want to pay just for big (and mostly pointless) spec numbers.
Apple offers higher build quality, a more user-friendly OS (Android is miles behind iOS and Windows Phone in that aspect), a more controlled environment (which, for normal people who are not "power users", is a good thing) and the status associated with the brand (the simple fact you think that is not important shows a complete lack of understanding of human nature). It's a perfectly valid approach.
Android, on the other hand, comes in larger variety, more price ranges, with better specs and much higher versatility (and, by consequence, complexity). If you want that, that's completely fine. But that does NOT mean it's the only approach that has value, it does NOT warrant all the pointless criticism Apple get from people like you and many others on this site.
Again, reading comments like yours is exactly as annoying as seeing people fervorously supporting everything Apple does and waiting in line to get the new model on day one. You're not any better than the "iSheep" you love to criticize.
No, actually it was tech in general, but since I'm more hardware orientated I tend to notice the posters who think that Intel, AMD, Nvidia and the other IHV's owe it to them to put out personalised SKU's - hence the example I supplied.
I believe you mentioned Windows 8, seemingly in order to pontificate about it. The fact that you put up a wall of text spouting the sermon of the BigFatClown pretty much confirms it.