Thanks AMD once again for your single core inefficiency. Your inefficiency that drove you to making twice the number of cores to equal Intel's offering.
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
The top Core i7(6 core) is ranked 9. (Intel Core i7-4960X [6 core with hyperthreading])
The top Core i7(4 core) is ranked 27. (Intel Core i7-4790K [4 core with hyperthreading])
The 1st AMD CPU is ranked 37. (AMD FX-9590 Eight-Core)
The 2nd AMD CPU is ranked 53. (AMD FX-9370 Eight-Core)
The 3rd AMD CPU is ranked 76. (AMD Opteron 6282 SE)
The 4th AMD CPU is ranked 79. (AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core)
The 5th AMD CPU is ranked 116. (AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core)
The top Core i5 is ranked 123. (Intel Core i5-4670K [4 core without hyperthreading])
The 6th AMD CPU is ranked 128. (AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core)
The 7th AMD CPU is ranked 149. (AMD Opteron 6234)
The 8th AMD CPU is ranked 153. (AMD FX-6350 Six-Core)
The 9th AMD CPU is ranked 174. (AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core)
The 10th AMD CPU is ranked 176. (AMD Opteron 3380)
There are only 7 more AMD CPU's above the top i3 ranking (all of which are 6+ cores). Only one of which is an APU, which by the way is a clear winner where internal graphics is concerned.
The top Core i3 is ranked 227. (Intel Core i3-4360 [2 core with hyperthreading])
BTW I wasn't posting to be clearly an Intel fan-boy. I hope you can see the differences between Intel and AMD core count for what it is. In my opinion if you are not interested in APU's integrated graphics, AMD has very little to offer. Only 17 of 226 CPU's above the ranking of an i3.
But please bare in mind this is only one benchmarking utility that should be used only as a guild-line.