Sign up for a new account or log in here:

Thanks for the review. What I'd really like to see is a review comparing all the 120-128GB drives....i.e. Intel vs OZC Vertex2 vs OZC Vertex 3 vs Crucial C300, Corsair, etc.
Interestingly.. this review only loads 4gb ram to make the difference between SSD and HD seem much more dramatic on load times.... if you spend $150 on 16gb ram... load times for CS5 on a 2600k get down below 1 second because of superfetch... SSD is obviously a lot slower than ram... don't believe the hype
Right now the Intel 510 120GB is actually less expensive than the Vertex 3 120GB. So the price and performance seem to fall in line (Source: Newegg).
Intel $2.25/GB
OCZ $2.50/GB
Actually you spotted a typo, it was a 2 x 4GB configuration for 8GB of RAM. That said your comment is very wrong by basically saying that 16GB of RAM will solve HDD latency. The fact that SSD's have a 0ms access time and hard drives have about 9ms access time is what it is all about.
Intel $2.25/GB
OCZ $2.50/GB
So did you copy and paste that directly from our conclusion? :S
Right on Steve, period...
Anyways, Intel's 500 series are good worthy successors but, the mainstream is just too busy drooling for the great V3 ![]()
Techspot nice review!
I really like the real world tests, gives a better view on the performance ![]()
I hope to see the 120GB Vertex 3 and the 128GB M4 added aswell ![]()
That would really help my buying decision ^^
Keep up the good work!
Absolutely agreed. Such a review would be highly appreciated, as I think drives in that capacity range tend to have a good blend of storage space and are priced at a level that many find acceptable.
| Trending | Featured |
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.