A $5 Bluetooth tracker hidden in a postcard exposed a warship's movements

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 1,902   +58
Staff
Oops: Inexpensive personal trackers have made finding items a trivial matter, but they come with some security risks. Recently, a €5 consumer gadget was enough to briefly track the movements of a modern European warship, showing how easily these low-cost devices can slip into operational blind spots.

Dutch regional broadcaster Omroep Gelderland reported that one of its journalists tracked HNLMS Evertsen, a Dutch air-defense frigate, during an active deployment in the eastern Mediterranean. The ship was operating to help protect France's aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle against missile threats when the tracking occurred.

The breach required no specialized equipment. Journalist Just Vervaart concealed a Bluetooth tracker inside a postcard. He then mailed it to the vessel using publicly available instructions from the Dutch Ministry of Defense, intended to help families send mail to loved ones stationed on the ship. This protocol provided enough details to get the tracker aboard the ship.

Once delivered, the tracker transmitted location data for roughly 24 hours. During that window, it showed the Evertsen departing from Heraklion, Crete, traveling west along the island's coastline, and then turning east toward Cyprus. The signal stopped the following day when the ship was near Cyprus and has not resumed since.

Defense officials later confirmed to the broadcaster that staff discovered the device during internal mail sorting and disabled it. Even so, the incident has already led to procedural changes. The Ministry is now moving to ban greeting cards containing batteries and is reviewing broader mail-handling guidelines.

The Register noted that Ministry guidance and informational videos indicated that envelopes were not subject to X-ray screening, unlike parcels. That gap allowed the tracking device to slip through ordinary mail.

Bluetooth trackers rely on nearby smartphones and other connected devices to relay location data. Originally designed to help locate lost personal items, they depend on distributed networks of nearby devices to function. In everyday use, that infrastructure is mostly harmless. In a military setting, it creates a quiet way to leak location data, especially when paired with predictable logistics.

Retired Dutch Lieutenant General Mart de Kruif framed the issue in terms of targeting precision enabled by modern technology.

"Nowadays, you can eliminate targets remotely and with great precision, but you do need to know where they are," he told Omroep Gelderland. "So, as a frigate, you never want to reveal your location to other people."

Balancing accessibility and security is not new, but the technology involved has changed. Practices once seen as low risk – like publishing mailing instructions or allowing unscanned letters – now intersect with cheap, widely available tracking hardware.

From a military standpoint, the incident shows that operational security can be weakened not by advanced tools, but by the combination of open information and cheap consumer technology. The same dynamic applies to enterprises, where convenience-driven processes can create exposure when paired with modern sensing and networked devices.

In this case, a controlled journalistic test exposed the vulnerability. The broader concern is that similar techniques require little expertise, minimal cost, and no privileged access – only an understanding of how everyday systems can serve new, potentially malicious, purposes.

Permalink to story:

 
Many years ago my boss at the time handed this out as gifts. I assume they weren't activated but mine went directly into the trash can. I know where my stuff is and it is all insured.
 
It does not matter who did it, left, right, middle, placing a tracking on any military vessel covertly is considered a form of espionage. He could have done it differently by letting the Military know beforehand or asking them questions about the possibility of this happening. Journalism is not a free pass to do anything as they too must follow laws like any one else. We really don't know what will happen to this Journalist beside being on the Government's watch list.
 
It does not matter who did it, left, right, middle, placing a tracking on any military vessel covertly is considered a form of espionage. He could have done it differently by letting the Military know beforehand or asking them questions about the possibility of this happening.

That's right. He should have sought permission before doing this, just like any real foreign agent or terrorist would.

/s
 
Large ships (such as aircraft carriers) are probably already being tracked; the indicated small ship is of no interest to anyone.
There are no free journalists; someone always pays them or they are looking for a sponsor by publishing lies.
Even Churchill wrote corrupt articles about the need to kill more Boer terrorists (they were simple farmers) and how cool he is . He got the idea from the biography of young Julius Caesar (how he was captured by pirates).

I'm wondering if crew members are allowed to take personal phones or laptops on board.
 
Last edited:
So this device required a nearby phone that was communicating to do anything right? So doesn't this security threat start with that phone?

I understand the phone may not intentionally be transmitting to the spy who wants to know where the ship is, but if it is transmitting location data to any app, it is transmitting it to a location data broker; and there are a very limited number of devices in the deep ocean compared to on land. For a sophisticated enemy this is enough especially after they've learned that certain phones (a set crew) are often seen together in the same place (=exact ship).

The good news I guess is if that phone was operating from land-based towers the tracking range is going to be when the ship is already visible a lot of other ways. But if the phone was connected to a ship-based WiFi that in turn connected to a satellite internet, that's everything.
 
The fact that you can bring a personal electronic device onboard a warship will already compromise its location. Modern electronics, be it smart watch, mobile phones, tablets, etc are able to track your whereabouts easily even when powered off.
 
Journalist = Scum
Why is it always you lol hell the US Navy has been doing stuff like this for years now, they were able to track a submarines movements because nearly the entire crew (believe it was officers) all booked hotels at the next location, does not help they were using the ships network whose proxy was not correctly set up and showed the ships FQDN. This is also a reason why big navy has been trying to keep bluetooth stuff banned on ships. I'm fine that they were able to do this, maybe dutch laws are different from american laws because I don't think this would fly in the USA.
 
Large ships (such as aircraft carriers) are probably already being tracked; the indicated small ship is of no interest to anyone.
There are no free journalists; someone always pays them or they are looking for a sponsor by publishing lies.
Even Churchill wrote corrupt articles about the need to kill more Boer terrorists (they were simple farmers) and how cool he is . He got the idea from the biography of young Julius Caesar (how he was captured by pirates).

I'm wondering if crew members are allowed to take personal phones or laptops on board.
Yes we are allowed to, however there are restrictions for those with nuclear reactors. No bluetooth enabled or devices with cameras are allowed within the engineering (nuke) spaces, however in regular spaces you are allowed to have your personal devices, cannot get into the exact procedure due to its classification, there is a procedure to fix any of these potential issues.
 
.... however in regular spaces you are allowed to have your personal devices.
If it's anything like the US Navy, you're allowed personal devices only in airplane mode.

... the US Navy has been doing stuff like this for years now, they were able to track a submarines movements because nearly the entire crew (believe it was officers) all booked hotels at the next location
Err, knowing that a submarine is en route to a specific port doesn't allow you to determine its real time position. It's a violation, sure, but far from getting a continual stream of GPS coordinates.

Large ships (such as aircraft carriers) are probably already being tracked
How do expect a nation without global spy satellite coverage to track even an aircraft carrier in the vastness of the Pacific, Atlantic, or Indian oceans?

Even Churchill wrote corrupt articles about the need to kill more Boer terrorists (they were simple farmers)
Those "simple farmers" captured Churchill and held him as a prisoner of war. And while many British acts during the Boer War were indefensible (fun fact: concentration camps were invented by the British during the war), Churchill himself wrote extensively about those camps, condemning the conditions in them that caused the deaths of tens of thousands of civilians.
 
If it's anything like the US Navy, you're allowed personal devices only in airplane mode.


Err, knowing that a submarine is en route to a specific port doesn't allow you to determine its real time position. It's a violation, sure, but far from getting a continual stream of GPS coordinates.


How do expect a nation without global spy satellite coverage to track even an aircraft carrier in the vastness of the Pacific, Atlantic, or Indian oceans?


Those "simple farmers" captured Churchill and held him as a prisoner of war. And while many British acts during the Boer War were indefensible (fun fact: concentration camps were invented by the British during the war), Churchill himself wrote extensively about those camps, condemning the conditions in them that caused the deaths of tens of thousands of civilians.
Sorry didn't specify, Submariner here, airplane mode wasn't a necessity as of the time I was on the boat, so think 2017-2021, knowing ships movements is a big deal, if you know a ship is homeported at Port A and they are going to Port B and you already know where it leaves and where its going, you can easily intercept.
 
the US Navy has been doing stuff like this for years now, they were able to track a submarines movements because nearly the entire crew (believe it was officers) all booked hotels at the next location, does not help they were using the ships network whose proxy was not correctly set up and showed the ships FQDN.
My favorite one is this one:
https://www.techspot.com/news/104599-navy-discovers-hidden-starlink-dish-us-warship-after.html
'Navy discovers hidden Starlink dish on US warship after spotting Wi-Fi network named "STINKY"'
Not done by a bunch of bored grunts, but senior staff.
Imagine these bozos getting deployed into an actual warzone.

It would probably go as well for them as it did for the Russian soldiers who started spamming "Happy new year" messages from their mobile phones whilst all conveniently together in a single location. Ukraine obliged and send them some fireworks.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64159045
 
My favorite one is this one:
https://www.techspot.com/news/104599-navy-discovers-hidden-starlink-dish-us-warship-after.html
'Navy discovers hidden Starlink dish on US warship after spotting Wi-Fi network named "STINKY"'
Not done by a bunch of bored grunts, but senior staff.
Imagine these bozos getting deployed into an actual warzone.

It would probably go as well for them as it did for the Russian soldiers who started spamming "Happy new year" messages from their mobile phones whilst all conveniently together in a single location. Ukraine obliged and send them some fireworks.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64159045
I remember this, it was such a big deal at the time that all of our goat locker had to be pulled away for training on how to discover if a secondary network had been installed lol

Oh yes, I remember the Ukraine one as well. It is wild what a little thing explodes (no pun intended) in your face.
 
...knowing ships movements is a big deal, if you know a ship is homeported at Port A and they are going to Port B and you already know where it leaves and where its going, you can easily intercept.
Sure ... if you're one of the few nations with a navy large and capable enough to setup a screening line of ships with sonars able to detect US subs -- and willing to start a war over it. It's certainly a violation, especially as our policy is to, even in peacetime, be continually prepared for war. It's just not quite the same category as advertising a stream of real-time coordinates to terrorist cells, who'd much rather simply attack a ship while in port anyway.
 
Is no one else dubious that a postcard was involved? A postcard, by definition, is a single piece of cardstock sent without an envelope. In this case, it was likely a greeting card rather than a postcard. Greeting cards sometimes have a battery to power LEDs or sound modules, and it would make sense that a tracker with a battery could be placed in a greeting card & envelope.

Sure, being concerned about security and protocols is paramount for navies, but the rest of us should be concerned about journalistic accuracy as well.
 
Perhaps the real problem here is phones/tablets/yourFavoriteDevices set to automagically find anything that it can connect to via any means and being set that way by default when you buy and use it. WTF?

I have a recent Samsung Android tablet which wants to do exactly that and was set that way by default. I turned that crap off. Seriously, WTF? I understand that some companies want to make things easy for the average dolt that has not clue how to find and connect to devices that connect wirelessly, but, IMO, beyond a shadow of a doubt, this "feature" is a serious security risk.

From what this article said, it sounds like this is exactly how these blue-tooth trackers are designed to operate. Take that feature away from any device like this, and they are little more than high-tech paper weights.

IMO, only the manufacturers of devices where this "near field" discovery is on by default should be blamed for this. Total BS that NO ONE f'ing needs, and the DOLTS can look up how to turn it on if they need or want it.

Even though he/she should rightly, IMO, be charged with espionage, Kudos to the reporter for uncovering this.

Any entity that is concerned with security and privacy should require that this feature is turned off on devices that have the feature.
 
Why is it always you lol hell the US Navy has been doing stuff like this for years now, they were able to track a submarines movements because nearly the entire crew (believe it was officers) all booked hotels at the next location, does not help they were using the ships network whose proxy was not correctly set up and showed the ships FQDN. This is also a reason why big navy has been trying to keep bluetooth stuff banned on ships. I'm fine that they were able to do this, maybe dutch laws are different from american laws because I don't think this would fly in the USA.
"Why is it always you..." Because I more honest than most
 
Journalist = Scum
I'd rather the journalist find the vulnerability first - and report it to force accountability - than an actual threat actor.

I'm sure the Dutch wish they had discovered/patched the flaw in their security themselves, first. But I am also sure they are glad it was a journo who found it before a hostile nation or organization that might have hid their exploit of this weakness.
 
I'd rather the journalist find the vulnerability first - and report it to force accountability - than an actual threat actor.

I'm sure the Dutch wish they had discovered/patched the flaw in their security themselves, first. But I am also sure they are glad it was a journo who found it before a hostile nation or organization that might have hid their exploit of this weakness.
Thank You for a well thought out post
 
But bluetooth is very short range wireless. How could the journalist track the vessel from a great distance without cooperation from someone else on board the boat with a phone or some other near device that could communicate with a satellite?
 
Back