A new capture method relies on water and pressure to efficiently trap carbon emissions

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,511   +934
Staff
Soda Effect: Creating a simple yet effective system for capturing carbon emissions could significantly improve sustainability across technology and other high-polluting industries. A number of ventures – including some major Big Tech players – are working to solve this challenge. Now, researchers have proposed a new method that stores carbon emissions in "fizzy" water containers.

Two researchers have developed a novel approach to CO2 capture and storage. Known as Pressure-Induced Carbon Capture, the method doesn't require complex chemical mixtures – just water and pressure. The team is now seeking industrial partners, particularly those responsible for emitting large volumes of exhaust gases.

PICC was invented by Mark Holtzapple, a professor of chemical engineering at Texas A&M University, and Jonathan Feinstein, founder of ExcelThermic Enterprises. The pair has filed multiple patents for the technology and is looking for licensees among power plants, hydrogen production facilities, steel blast furnace operators, and other heavy emitters.

Holtzapple argues that PICC could offer an efficient solution to the growing challenge of industrial carbon emissions. The system "physically" absorbs CO2 by cooling and compressing the gas before sending it through an absorption device. Its internal structure is designed to maximize absorption efficiency: cold water flows downward while the pressurized gas moves upward, increasing the contact between the two.

"Our invention is a cost-effective way to address one of the greatest challenges facing humanity. We can capture carbon dioxide from flue gas using only water and pressure, which makes the process simple, clean and less expensive than competing technologies." Holtzapple stated.

PICC can reportedly absorb up to 99 percent of carbon emissions, compared to the roughly 90 percent achievable with traditional capture methods that rely on carbon-binding chemical compounds. The resulting "fizzy" CO2-saturated water is then routed through a system of progressively lower-pressure chambers, where the carbon dioxide is fully extracted and compressed for storage.

According to the economic model proposed by Holtzapple and Feinstein, PICC can capture and compress 99 percent of carbon emissions at a cost of about $26 per metric ton – far below the $50 to $100 per ton typical of conventional methods. By adding a small amount of lime for just a few additional dollars, the researchers say CO2 absorption can even reach 100 percent.

The challenge of disposing and storing industrial emissions has led to an increasingly unconventional array of solutions. Some startups aim to sequester carbon in the ocean, while others are experimenting with injecting carbon-rich human waste deep underground. Microsoft has shown particular interest in the latter approach and recently signed a long-term deal to purchase large quantities of carbon credits from Vaulted Deep.

Permalink to story:

 
Does anyone know when the floods will arrive? I thought they were supposed to be here about 5 years ago when the poles melted. 10 more years? 20? When the great green scam has sucked up all of our money?
Noticeable sea rise by around 2050 and sea rise that threatens coastal cities by around 2100.

You can stop panicking now. Should absolutely stop doing anything green too. Those people in the future when you're not about don't matter.
 
And it was what, just last week where scientist checking ice cores that dated to hundreds of thousands of years ago, found that the Earth temperature was WARMER then, than even today with all of our "greenhouse gasses" and "industrial revolution" stuff?
Not to mention the how many thousands of acres of the Amazon "rain forest" are being leveled for the COP30 conference in Belém Brazil, with you can bet hundreds of private jets flying in to attend the conference. Bunch of hypocrites.
 
The author of this is apparently among the 'experts' who think CO2 is a pollutant, ignoring the fact they produce CO2 themselves and will die (just like everything else) in the absence of it :)

CO2 is not a pollutant, it makes the planet greener and the crops a lot higher.
Capturing CO2 is not merely a brainless waste of money and resources - it's actively harmful.

Noticeable sea rise by around 2050 and sea rise that threatens coastal cities by around 2100.

You can stop panicking now. Should absolutely stop doing anything green too. Those people in the future when you're not about don't matter.
A sea rise that threatens coastal cities and sinks entire islands was first prophesied for 2010, not 2100. I guess you swapped the digits by mistake.
 
A sea rise that threatens coastal cities and sinks entire islands was first prophesied for 2010, not 2100. I guess you swapped the digits by mistake.
Maybe prophets said this nonsense but scientists have never done so. Beware of experts and science media, see who is paying them. Parroting fools and bad actors or arguing against them is a foolish endeavor.

Climate science has been totally unflinching since the greenhouse effect was discovered in the 1960's, it's progressing exactly as calculated then.
 
By adding a small amount of lime for just a few additional dollars, the researchers say CO2 absorption can even reach 100 percent.
Fizzy lime water... I feel like I'm reading an Aprils fools post.
Seems interesting though, sounds like the water is just used temporarily to capture the carbon and the carbon is extracted after so hopefully this can be deployed in a way where the water gets re-used (becoming an increasingly precious resource). I've seen some other project a while ago using carbon to create 'bricks' for building houses so I guess they can do the same with this. Brick production is another big CO2 contributor so win-win?

Surprising amount of climate change deniers in these comments. Look up statics of natural disasters over time and see if it lines up with us humans burning things, chopping down trees, mass scale agriculture etc.
Sea levels are up, regions where ice hasn't melted for millennia is melting etc. Just because certain overestimates didn't hold up all of it is a big 'hoax'. Turns out our planet is a rather complex collection of all kinds of systems that affect each other and it's extremely hard to predict things.

Not all as bad as sources had made it out to be but our presence on this planet is definitely having an impact. Might not be all bad everywhere, looks like Greenland is on its way to actually becoming a land of greenery. But for a lot of established regions it's gonna have undesired effects as well.
 
Maybe prophets said this nonsense but scientists have never done so. Beware of experts and science media, see who is paying them. Parroting fools and bad actors or arguing against them is a foolish endeavor.

Climate science has been totally unflinching since the greenhouse effect was discovered in the 1960's, it's progressing exactly as calculated then.
Those spreading the nonsense claimed 97% of scientists agreed with them.
 
Those spreading the nonsense claimed 97% of scientists agreed with them.
Yeah liars are liars, for sure.

There is a major environmental problem that's slowly escalating though, it's interesting to watch.
 
Last edited:
This pressure and water method is used to reduce human cadavers to concentrated liquid(which is used in a very large industry). Most people contain carbon, correct? wait that might have been debunked*sarc*...
so these guys are repurposing the technology and with a separate patent that adds lime and works on mega-industrial scale...
wait- whaaaat? what(wtf) if,the plan is to use these huge machines to depopulate the carbon people which will seemingly vanish people whilst convincing some that the rapture has begun.
 
Back