and people wonder why we have global warming.
I invite you to try looking into flashing to bios that allows some higher voltage. Depending on which GTX780 you have, you may be able to get another 100mhz or more (watch temperatures).Only things that disappoints me is the overclock headroom, which is pretty much non existent. As my 780 (with the stock cooler) I can get to 1.1GHz before it bottoms out.
Kinda, but there isn't a better way.
Which graph is listed as (Higher is Better)? Unless they have already been edited, I didn't see one and looked at all of them.I might be wrong, but I think the 99th Percentile Frame Time graphs should read (Lower is Better), not (Higher is Better).
I invite you to try looking into flashing to bios that allows some higher voltage. Depending on which GTX780 you have, you may be able to get another 100mhz or more (watch temperatures).
FINALLY! Thank you Techspot for a bang on review!
I literally cannot wait for the 780 to drop in price! I can get another 780
It definitely performed better than some of the leaks suggested, Very Impressed they managed such decent performance for it's price.
Only things that disappoints me is the overclock headroom, which is pretty much non existent. As my 780 (with the stock cooler) I can get to 1.1GHz before it bottoms out.
It has been awhile since I have used EVGA Precision. From what I remember, voltage adjustments were the only thing I couldn't do with EVGA Precision that MSI Afterburner does. If I'm not badly mistaken both utilities allow for starting at bootup and maintaining over-clocks. Now EVGA Precision even allows for voltage adjustments, but at the time the lack there of was why I started using MSI Afterburner.Btw Burty117, try MSI afterburner, you can set it to keep overclocks on restarts/boot up.
Which graph is listed as (Higher is Better)? Unless they have already been edited, I didn't see one and looked at all of them.I might be wrong, but I think the 99th Percentile Frame Time graphs should read (Lower is Better), not (Higher is Better).
So my GTX 660 (which would be relatively close to the 660Ti) having a higher count would be better than a GTX 690? I think you are misinterpreting these graphs, as lower is clearly better.It's wrong on all 99th Percentile Frame Time graphs in this article. If you check the article
Are you by chance looking at this from a mobile device? Because I don't understand why you would see something that does not show on mine. Everyone of the 99th Percentile graphs are labeled "Lower is Better". I hope you are not interpreting lower as being the card listed last as being better.I just looked and all the "99th Percentile" graphs say "Higher is Better."
You can keep dreaming...The price is going to drop down to a range of 500-599 for a 780, I doubt the titan will move much because that's just how NVidia is, it may come down to 800. Even so, the 290X is still going to be the best card deal around and is a titan without the titan price.now NVidia will breakout the 780 ti and maybe a full capable Titan. oh ,hangon a sec, wasn't a 780 ti recently announced? and this 290x is already clocked to the near max.oh,and after some intense gaming its throttling already..lololololol,,, not much too see here .move along..
Well LinusTechTips Has done the review whereby they have a stock 780 and stock R290x and overclocks both to as much as they can go:I really want to see the setting on the card to see how far it can go, im curious how high the voltage settings go. I bet with a nice liquid block I could get it up to 1100 at least before I warm up my entire apartment complex
The 780ti is only at the rumors and slight "Leaks" phase as no official showing are out yet (At least showing specs). Even if you count in that its going to land in-between a 780-titan, its not going to beat a 290X unless it specifically smokes a titan by overclocking with the additional Cuda Cores which would already diminish the already struggling value of the titan.