AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT could go head-to-head with RTX 4080 in raster and ray tracing performance

Daniel Sims

Posts: 2,418   +73
Staff
Rumor mill: Rumors have long indicated that AMD aims to shrink Nvidia's lead in ray tracing performance with its next generation of discrete graphics cards. With both companies reportedly releasing new GPUs within weeks, new data suggests Team Red might put up a serious fight in the mid-range sector next year.

A proven leaker from the Chiphell forums recently reported that an upcoming AMD RDNA4 graphics card substantially outperforms the company's current flagship in ray tracing while drawing less power. Furthermore, it will likely cost far less, with performance resembling competitor Nvidia's current high-end GPU.

In a discussion concerning an upcoming AMD card, likely to be called the Radeon RX 8800 XT, leaker "zhangzhonghao" stated that its ray tracing performance surpasses the RX 7900 XTX by around 45 percent in the Resident Evil 4 Remake and other titles. We should note that Capcom's action horror remake only features ray-traced reflections, and the other games were unnamed, but the tipster described AMD's RT performance uplift as "epic."

Radeon RX 6000 and 7000 GPUs have lagged behind Nvidia's GeForce RTX cards for years in games that heavily utilize ray tracing. One such title, Star Wars Outlaws, shows the RX 7900 XTX barely outpacing the RTX 4070, which is around $400 cheaper.

In contrast, the RX 8800 XT matches the RTX 4080 and 4080 Super in traditional raster rendering and ray tracing, representing a dramatic improvement. It also consumes about 25 percent less power than the 7900 XTX, suggesting a TDP no higher than 270W. If zhangzhonghao's report proves accurate, it would align with an AMD data sheet that leaked earlier this year, which described new technology designed to boost RT performance in the company's future products.

Inno3D, which sells Nvidia graphics cards, recently confirmed that Team Green plans to reveal its upcoming RTX 50 series at CES in January. Prior rumors suggested that AMD would reveal RDNA 4 at the event, launching the next generation of the GPU race.

If the RX 8800 XT trades blows with the RTX 4080, the RTX 5070 might become its true rival. Pricing details remain unclear for both upcoming lineups, but history suggests AMD might have a slight advantage. Furthermore, a mysterious Geekbench entry hinted that the RX 8800 XT, presumably based on the Navi 48 GPU, features 16GB of VRAM, surpassing the 5070's rumored 12GB.

The RX 8800 XT will likely be the top-ranked RDNA4 card, as AMD plans to focus on the mid-range and mainstream tiers for now. Intel is preparing to launch new GPUs targeting the mainstream market this week.

Permalink to story:

 
5070 will have it beat in efficiency hands down, and probably be 15% slower in raster while evenly matched in FPS when RT is enabled. The real question is, how much cheaper will the 8800XT be? $500 for 8800XT vs $600 for 5070, that’d seem pretty standard at this point.
 
I would expect so, considering that the RTX 5070 will be released alongside the RX 8800 XT which will most likely exceed the past gen 4080 by all measures.
 
I think pricing will be the vital part here. When it comes to the powerdraw - this could potentially be a good fit for a powerful build in a small case - but if they go toe to toe against 5070 in pricing, there will be limited sales here
 
I would expect so, considering that the RTX 5070 will be released alongside the RX 8800 XT which will most likely exceed the past gen 4080 by all measures.


You been hitting the eggnog already. Good luck with that. Do you also believe magically, 5080 will match 4090 while only costing $1K?
 
Very nice to see amd improving on rt, but still would be good to see 8900xtx version before I do an upgrade.
 
5070 will have it beat in efficiency hands down, and probably be 15% slower in raster while evenly matched in FPS when RT is enabled. The real question is, how much cheaper will the 8800XT be? $500 for 8800XT vs $600 for 5070, that’d seem pretty standard at this point.
I mean, 4070 is already 700 bucks here, even going to 800 for some Asus models... Somehow AMD cards here sell for exactly the price they should be sellin them. Idk why Nvidia cards go for so much more than their original price.
 
I'd believe in "magic"..
...magic like when 4080 performs better while cheaper than 3090 Ti at launch..
The real comparison is with the 3080, not the top GPU which is almost never the best value. The 4080 was worse than the 3080 when looking at perf/$ (both MSRP and real retail prices).

FYI the 3090Ti was cheaper than the 4080 at launch in stores :) (1100 vs 1200), although value wise it was slightly worse.
 
Very nice to see amd improving on rt, but still would be good to see 8900xtx version before I do an upgrade.
Probably won’t be released - AMD is skipping the upper tier cards this round. We’re looking at late 2026 for potential new high end cards from AMD
 
There is no high end AMD GPU this generation as far as I understand. The 8800XT may be the highest end card from AMD that will battle in the midrange segment.

Saw the mentioned on Moore's law is Dead

I've said the same about Zen 6 vs Zen 5 - different teams , different expectations

Nvidia and AMD still making money elsewhere AI , servers etc

Would like to see AMD attack mid range with sharp pricing

Also think with M.L.I.D - only skimmed quickly - but something about AMD trying to get it's own "cuda" like product up to scratch , as straight rasterization no longer cuts it, and though people here scoff at AI
Nvidia can sell a lot of value added over RTX , sound manipulation , encoding , SDR to HDR , AI scaling on any media etc . AMD needs to get this down pat
 
Oh boy here we go.

CHOO CHOO all abord the AMD Hype train... again.

It derailed even before leaving the station thanks to AMD ceding the high end this generation and people are still jumping onboard.
High-end is a minuscule fraction of the market and it has nowhere remotely near the impact you think it does.

The vast overwhelming majority of the GPU market is in the $200 to $400-ish range. Those are the products that actually matter.
 
There is no high end AMD GPU this generation as far as I understand. The 8800XT may be the highest end card from AMD that will battle in the midrange segment.
I do know that, but at the same time there is little less reliable stuff than corporation decisions. 5600x3d werent considered before release of 5800x3d or even long time after.
I'm still fine with 6950xt, but slowly looking at some upgrade. If 6 months into next year the 8800 will still be the only one available and the performance will be solid, I will decide then:)
 
High-end is a minuscule fraction of the market and it has nowhere remotely near the impact you think it does.

The vast overwhelming majority of the GPU market is in the $200 to $400-ish range. Those are the products that actually matter.
This is the same faulty mindset AMD has been using for years.

A reminder, back when the 1080ti was a $700 card, the $350 1070 outsold the ENTIRETY of polaris, back when the line was "GPUs $200 and under actually matter". More recently, the 4090 appears to have a higher marketshare then most AMD cards.

But that's the difference between a GPU maker that makes $490 million a quarter and one that makes close to $10 billion. Clearly thos elow end sales are helping them here!
I mean, 4070 is already 700 bucks here, even going to 800 for some Asus models... Somehow AMD cards here sell for exactly the price they should be sellin them. Idk why Nvidia cards go for so much more than their original price.
Supply and demand.
Oh boy here we go.

CHOO CHOO all abord the AMD Hype train... again.

It derailed even before leaving the station thanks to AMD ceding the high end this generation and people are still jumping onboard.
This train crash will be something to see. AMD had almost no improvement with rDNA3 core for core, but somehow THIS time will be better XD.

Bet: the 8800 XT will be between the 7900GRE and 7900xt in both raster and RT, performance per CU will be within 5% of current tech. AMD will lost even more market share.
 
You been hitting the eggnog already. Good luck with that. Do you also believe magically, 5080 will match 4090 while only costing $1K?

5080 and/or Ti/Super will most likely will hit 4090 performance or better, but no, I don't believe it will only cost $999 -- why price it so low? It's not like AMD nor Intel can release anything to compete -- It would be zero surprise to see the 5080 Ti/super launch at the (founders) 4090 MSRP.


AMD and Intel may have taken their foot off the gas, that's not the case with nVidia which we can still expect performance gains gen over gen and at least 2 if not 3 (Titan, 5090, 5080) class leading cards. The only difference will be that nVidia could easily price those cards on an even steeper price increase(s) of past gens. nVidia has said that the top gamers card this time around is the 5070 Ti Super with the 5080, 5090, and Titan considered as pro cards -- To me that signals a very strong performance out of the 5070 Ti and everything above it costing a good amount more. The 5070 Ti price and performance will make or break the RX 8800 XT and perhaps even B770/B790 Battlemage cards (you can bet nVidia is well on top of that).
 
Last edited:
No way they are going to make best Radeon 8000 "mid-end series" as good as 4080 is. Maybe in a few cherrypicked games.

Also, they list RE4 for RT perf, but RT implementation is pure garbage in this game. Looks worse than no RT. The fact this game is mentioned for RT performance, raised my eyebrows. Sounds like marketing talk.

Don't get me wrong, would love to see a 8700XT/8800XT in 4080 territory however I don't believe it. It is not like AMD is going 3nm. Its 5/4nm again.

5070 is only getting 6400 cores - 5070 Ti and 4080 is going to be much faster than base 5070.

I think 5070 is the target for best Radeon 8000 SKU. Might beat it slightly too (in raster).

I still expect 7900XT raster performance from best Radeon 8000 SKU, at most and 7900XT is around 15-20% slower than 4080.

If 500 dollars and 220-250 watts this is a good deal, especially if FSR4 is released as well and will match DLSS or get close (in motion)
 
Last edited:
5070 will have it beat in efficiency hands down, and probably be 15% slower in raster while evenly matched in FPS when RT is enabled. The real question is, how much cheaper will the 8800XT be? $500 for 8800XT vs $600 for 5070, that’d seem pretty standard at this point.

5070 will likely be $1200 as NVIDIA gets greedy.
 
There is no high end AMD GPU this generation as far as I understand. The 8800XT may be the highest end card from AMD that will battle in the midrange segment.
Wow, that's very disappointing. So it's pretty much a 7900xtx with better ray tracing and lower power consumption? I mean I love my 7900xtx but damn...if that's as good as it's going to get color me disappointed.
 
Wow, that's very disappointing. So it's pretty much a 7900xtx with better ray tracing and lower power consumption? I mean I love my 7900xtx but damn...if that's as good as it's going to get color me disappointed.
AMD claims it will be faster than a 7900xtx in RT. In all likelihood, the 8800xt will be 7900GRE level, MAYBE 7900xt at best. They're not going past midrange this time.

I was kinda excited for a 8900xtx to replace my 6800xt but maybe I'll keep it another generation. Or get a 5080 or 5090.
 
AMD claims it will be faster than a 7900xtx in RT. In all likelihood, the 8800xt will be 7900GRE level, MAYBE 7900xt at best. They're not going past midrange this time.

I was kinda excited for a 8900xtx to replace my 6800xt but maybe I'll keep it another generation. Or get a 5080 or 5090.
That really sucks. They basically made zero progress on anything other than ray tracing which I personally don't even care about. And Nvidia is free do anything they want with prices because they have no competition in the above average cards.
 
Back