AMD working on 4- and 8-core ARM-based chips for embedded market

By Jos · 8 replies
Sep 10, 2013
Post New Reply
  1. AMD started building low-power server chips based on the ARM architecture earlier this year with the “Seattle” Opteron X-Series. The move marked an interesting shift for the company in its attempt to challenge Intel’s dominance of the steadily growing data...

    Read more
  2. Ah, AMD, when I thought you could sink no lower, you come and surprise me by making me realise that there is no "lowest" point for you as you continuously best yourself in that department by shying away from real competition. Now that you have pretty much admitted defeat in the x86 market, you run ,with your tail between your legs I might add, to a platform that has yet to prove itself a viable alternative. There was a reason that the RISC architecture failed to gain traction all those years ago and you will most likely find out, the hard way, why it will fail this time too. These architectures are good for certain applications but I seriously doubt they will prove too much of a threat to Intel in these kinds of markets. So instead of whimpering in the corner and before any real chance that you may have fizzles out completely, give us something actually worth wanting. Unless you really want to end up supplying aircraft manufacturers as your full time day job and leave real computing to Intel, I mean, it's only a matter of time before Intel catches up to your ATI acquisitions graphics efforts, which lets be honest, have not exactly lived up to the rivals alternatives lately. Is this another market where your relevance is fizzling out?
  3. PC nerd

    PC nerd TS Booster Posts: 317   +41

    Good to see AMD getting their **** together. Can't be having intel monopolising everything.
  4. dividebyzero

    dividebyzero trainee n00b Posts: 4,891   +1,264

    Don't be so sure. The slide says that "Bald Eagle" (aka Kaveri) features HD 9000 series graphics...while AMDs GPU marketing are saying that the new nomenclature is Rx xxx ( I.e. HD 9870 would be R8 270....R = Radeon presumeably. The first number is the market segment. The second number is the architectural generation (GCN 2 also presumably), followed by the two numbers that define the model within the segment hierarchy).

    All in all, it sounds like at least two divisions within AMD aren't on speaking terms.
  5. Couldn't you be more wrong? While is true that Intel has the dominance of the x86 market, in graphics they can't even touch nVidia or AMD. Plus AMD and nVidia are competitive to the point that all their sku's are aligned and priced competetively. ARM is just another arm for them to get more money, as companies here aren't for charity, are for profits. I wouldn't like AMD to go down or in the end, we will pay $200 for Celeron dual cores, and $300 for GeForce GTX 650.
  6. DKRON

    DKRON TS Guru Posts: 569   +25

    AMD should just admit defeat and sell their services to Intel for billions to give them their graphics chips, imagine a HD9000 on a i7, would have no need for cheap graphics cards
  7. PC nerd

    PC nerd TS Booster Posts: 317   +41

    >what is a monopoly?
  8. DKRON

    DKRON TS Guru Posts: 569   +25

    Its not like AMD is winning the war anyway, they will eventually go down and get no money for it
  9. PC nerd

    PC nerd TS Booster Posts: 317   +41

    Enjoy your intel monopoly. Paying £200 for a 10% rise in performance between generations.

Similar Topics

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...