An AI hallucination nearly started a war between the US and China

Daniel Sims

Posts: 2,631   +79
Staff
The takeaway: Warnings from AI developers have sparked widespread debate over whether, and how, the technology might cause human extinction. While much of that discussion has centered on rogue AI incidents, events in the Middle East suggest that military action driven by hallucinating AI tools may be the more immediate danger.

Sources connected to the US military recently told CNN that the US nearly moved to intercept a Chinese vessel in the Middle East this spring based on false intel from an AI-assisted report. The report was based on an inaccurate chatbot response that identified the ship as carrying materials for a nuclear weapons program.

Two sources said armed military personnel were preparing to board the vessel, with military planes already in the air, before officials took a closer look at the report and discovered it was at least partially AI-generated.

One source described the intel as completely false, saying it nearly started a war between the two nuclear powers. What was actually on the ship remains unclear.

An analyst had asked an unnamed chatbot to assess intelligence on the ship's manifest, information that originated with Special Operations Command Pacific. It's still unclear whether the chatbot was commercial or government-owned.

An official familiar with the US military's AI deployments told CNN, that a government chatbot would likely have been forked or cloned from a commercial product and augmented with government intelligence. Either way, the analyst also used AI to write an intelligence report based on the erroneous response – one that put the military on high alert.

The incident showcases the US military's push to accelerate AI adoption amid its war with Iran. In January, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced plans to embrace AI more aggressively and eliminate bureaucratic barriers, warning that falling behind on the technology could cede the initiative to China and other US adversaries. Analysts, meanwhile, reportedly face mounting pressure to disseminate reports faster using AI.

The military has primarily used AI for intelligence analysis, logistics, and targeting. Anthropic's Claude, for example, was central to the US's opening strikes in the Iran war, including the one that killed Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. But AI targeting based on outdated information may have also contributed to a strike on a school in Minab that killed 168 people, mostly children – an attack widely blamed on the US that UN-backed experts have flagged as a possible war crime.

US officials told CNN that the Chinese vessel incident isn't the only time the military has run into AI hallucinations.

Permalink to story:

 
I don't think a single attack on a boat would start a war unless it was followed up by more action. If it happened by mistake, that would come to light quickly and some form of compensation would happen.

But with Hegseth, who knows. He might escalate it just for fun.
 
This is total BS.
The CNN article does not contain a single verifiable claim.

Everything is based on what anonymous 'sources' allegedly said, but we have no reason to believe these 'sources' exist at all. Either the whole thing was entirely made up by CNN to spread AI hysteria, or it's a hyper-inflated story overheard in a bar.

Sadly, that's the state of today's 'journalism'.
We should not believe anything without solid evidence confirmed by multiple reliable witnesses (of course, reliable explicitly excludes anonymous).
 
TechSpot: “US officials told CNN that the Chinese vessel incident isn't the only time the military has run into AI hallucinations.”

CNN: “US Special Operations Command Pacific and the Pentagon did not respond to a request for comment.”

The evidence that CNN points to for “AI hallucinations” is a 2023 article titled “AI tools make things up a lot, and that’s a huge problem”. At least AI points to the sources so they’re verifiable. I would argue “Journalists make things up a lot, and that’s a huge problem”.
 
"Yes, the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders."
Claims that AI is an existential risk are highly exaggerated. I would argue that there’s a greater chance AI executives are making this claim to usher in regulatory capture (to make more money) than the chance it’s actually true. Humanity doesn’t even have the ability to unexpectedly destroy the planet with our creations.

We certainly have the ability to impair life as we know it, but the greatest risk of doing so is by the government itself. Covid is the perfect example of that. Other risks are war, the Kessler Syndrome, communism, and population collapse. Each of these risks are primarily localized. I’d be interested in hearing specific examples of claims that AI will harm life. Even the fear of an “AI botnet swarm” is unprecedented and unwarranted: https://www.axios.com/2026/09/15/anthropic-dario-ai-agents-safety-botnet
 
Go look up Stanislav Petrov. In 1983, the Soviet early warning system "detected" a nuclear missile fired from the United States with four more behind it, headed toward the Soviet Union. He figured that if the USA were to fire, it wouldn't be just 4-5 missiles but ALL of them, so he, a HUMAN made the decision that it was a false alarm and did not send out an alert, which would have required a full response.

Think AI can pull that off?
 
There's no such thing as "hallucinating AI" brotha.

it's just bad, written code by some unqualified coder.
 
"Hallucination".....right.

Poor programming or intentional sabotage passed, off as an error, by an AI system that is potentially (if the tech bros are to be believed) 9/10s of the way to being AM? You be the judge.

I hate it here. I don't know what's worse: the clods running the show or the malevolent agents of chaos, engaged in war profiteering. Every direction is the wrong one. There seems to be no way out. Maybe, in a better time, governed by wiser people, things could have ended differently to how they did...

All I know is, I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream.
 
Back