An AI hallucination nearly started a war between the US and China

Daniel Sims

Posts: 2,569   +77
Staff
The takeaway: Warnings from AI developers have sparked widespread debate over whether, and how, the technology might cause human extinction. While much of that discussion has centered on rogue AI incidents, events in the Middle East suggest that military action driven by hallucinating AI tools may be the more immediate danger.

Sources connected to the US military recently told CNN that the US nearly moved to intercept a Chinese vessel in the Middle East this spring based on false intel from an AI-assisted report. The report was based on an inaccurate chatbot response that identified the ship as carrying materials for a nuclear weapons program.

Two sources said armed military personnel were preparing to board the vessel, with military planes already in the air, before officials took a closer look at the report and discovered it was at least partially AI-generated.

One source described the intel as completely false, saying it nearly started a war between the two nuclear powers. What was actually on the ship remains unclear.

An analyst had asked an unnamed chatbot to assess intelligence on the ship's manifest, information that originated with Special Operations Command Pacific. It's still unclear whether the chatbot was commercial or government-owned.

An official familiar with the US military's AI deployments told CNN, that a government chatbot would likely have been forked or cloned from a commercial product and augmented with government intelligence. Either way, the analyst also used AI to write an intelligence report based on the erroneous response – one that put the military on high alert.

The incident showcases the US military's push to accelerate AI adoption amid its war with Iran. In January, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced plans to embrace AI more aggressively and eliminate bureaucratic barriers, warning that falling behind on the technology could cede the initiative to China and other US adversaries. Analysts, meanwhile, reportedly face mounting pressure to disseminate reports faster using AI.

The military has primarily used AI for intelligence analysis, logistics, and targeting. Anthropic's Claude, for example, was central to the US's opening strikes in the Iran war, including the one that killed Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. But AI targeting based on outdated information may have also contributed to a strike on a school in Minab that killed 168 people, mostly children – an attack widely blamed on the US that UN-backed experts have flagged as a possible war crime.

US officials told CNN that the Chinese vessel incident isn't the only time the military has run into AI hallucinations.

Permalink to story:

 
When the world finally ends I hope I can spend some quality time on the toilet before AI requires me to pinch one off and die.
 
I don't think a single attack on a boat would start a war unless it was followed up by more action. If it happened by mistake, that would come to light quickly and some form of compensation would happen.

But with Hegseth, who knows. He might escalate it just for fun.
 
I don't think a single attack on a boat would start a war unless it was followed up by more action. If it happened by mistake, that would come to light quickly and some form of compensation would happen.

But with Hegseth, who knows. He might escalate it just for fun.
Might want to research how Vietnam sparked off.
 
I don't think a single attack on a boat would start a war unless it was followed up by more action. If it happened by mistake, that would come to light quickly and some form of compensation would happen.

But with Hegseth, who knows. He might escalate it just for fun.
Hegseth is a man with balls. Rare these days
 
This is total BS.
The CNN article does not contain a single verifiable claim.

Everything is based on what anonymous 'sources' allegedly said, but we have no reason to believe these 'sources' exist at all. Either the whole thing was entirely made up by CNN to spread AI hysteria, or it's a hyper-inflated story overheard in a bar.

Sadly, that's the state of today's 'journalism'.
We should not believe anything without solid evidence confirmed by multiple reliable witnesses (of course, reliable explicitly excludes anonymous).
 
Back