Angry viewer sues Netflix over streaming issues during Tyson vs Paul fight

midian182

Posts: 11,706   +177
Staff member
Facepalm: Netflix's streaming of the Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul boxing match last week was considered a success by the company as it attracted a peak of 65 million viewers. What wasn't a success, though, was the quality of the stream for a large number of people watching – or trying to watch. Now, one angry viewer has launched a class-action lawsuit against the company over the buffering issues.

The Tyson/Paul match reached a peak of 65 million households globally, with 38 million concurrent streams in the United States, according to Tudum. Netflix said it was the most streamed global sporting event ever.

However, thousands of viewers struggled to watch the eight two-minute rounds as Netflix's servers groaned under the pressure. Even the streaming giant itself admitted to the problems.

"The boxing mega-event dominated social media, shattered records, and even had our buffering systems on the ropes," Netflix wrote in a post on X on Sunday.

TMZ Sports reports that one of those frustrated viewers was Ronald "Blue" Denton. The Florida resident says that he and many others had to endure "legendary" problems, including no access, streaming glitches, and buffering issues when they started watching the event at around 8pm on Friday.

Down Detector, the platform that provides real-time updates on the status of websites and online services, noted that almost 85,000 viewers experienced problems with outages or streaming leading up to the fight.

Denton is suing Netflix for breach of contract. He is also asking for unspecified damages.

Netflix CTO Elizabeth Stone mentioned the problems in a memo to employees. The exec said the massive number of viewers created technical challenges that were tackled "brilliantly" by the team, who prioritized stability of the stream for the majority of viewers.

"I'm sure many of you have seen the chatter in the press and on social media about the quality issues," Stone continued (as reported by Bloomberg's Mark Gurman), adding: "We don't want to dismiss the poor experience of some members, and know we have room for improvement, but still consider this event a huge success."

Netflix has not yet commented on the lawsuit.

The streamer will doubtlessly be hoping its next major live sporting event won't encounter the same problems. On Decemeber 25, the NFL Christmas Gameday Live is being broadcast on the site for all members, who can watch Kansas City Chiefs face the Pittsburgh Steelers before the Houston Texans host the Baltimore Ravens.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by BeyonceÌÂ (@beyonce)

The second game is likely to be extremely popular, even among those who don't like football, as Beyoncé will be taking to the field as the halftime performer. The singer will be giving the first live performance of songs from her Cowboy Carter album.

Permalink to story:

 
Low and behold a class action lawsuit rises from the ashes because someone couldn't watch a boxing match. If they win the case, the lawyer will get a few million dollars while everyone else gets 10 cents. If your whole life is based on a boxing match, then you seriously need some soul searching.
 
No, they have a legit claim. The troubles were known and Netflix confirmed them.
What is his monetary loss? Let us pretend this guy's home was completely void of all technology and he wanted to watch this ONE event his home. After that he wouldn't use any of the equipment again.

Internet Installation 50.00
Internet for 1 month 100.00
WiFi Router 50.00
TV 300.00
Netflix Premium for 1 month 24.00
Total Cost $524.00

You think a reputable lawyer is going to file a lawsuit for $600???
The Court costs alone would be a couple of thousand.


Or are you going to claim he experienced mental distress???
 
Low and behold a class action lawsuit rises from the ashes because someone couldn't watch a boxing match. If they win the case, the lawyer will get a few million dollars while everyone else gets 10 cents. If your whole life is based on a boxing match, then you seriously need some soul searching.
While this is true it's also not cool that they advertised the hell out of it and then didn't deliver. They made a crap ton of money even if people only signed up for a month for the fight.
I mean I wouldn't go as far as a class action lawsuit but I sure as hell won't trust them again.
 
What is his monetary loss? Let us pretend this guy's home was completely void of all technology and he wanted to watch this ONE event his home. After that he wouldn't use any of the equipment again.

Internet Installation 50.00
Internet for 1 month 100.00
WiFi Router 50.00
TV 300.00
Netflix Premium for 1 month 24.00
Total Cost $524.00

You think a reputable lawyer is going to file a lawsuit for $600???
The Court costs alone would be a couple of thousand.


Or are you going to claim he experienced mental distress???
Netflix advertised and promoted an event with certain specifications, such as 1080P or 4K* resolution. They spectacularly failed to deliver. They may have some liability.

*Yes, I'm sure there are caveats on the TOS but Netflix failed to the point of the event being unwatchable.
 
Netflix advertised and promoted an event with certain specifications, such as 1080P or 4K* resolution. They spectacularly failed to deliver. They may have some liability.

*Yes, I'm sure there are caveats on the TOS but Netflix failed to the point of the event being unwatchable.
Ha... It couldn't even load for a huge number of people. Hell I would have been happy with 480p.
 
The fact that this fight accumulated more hate than support is ground-breaking for boxing may have something to do with the issues, perhaps interrupted on purpose.

It was all along the lines - "Boxing veteran vs Media bubble-head, next is Jake Paul vs Biden".

 
I think Netflix should have gotten in front of this whole thing and just immediately comped one month sub for all subscribers that has had a constant subscription for the last 90 days. This would have appeased most subscribers.

What this whole debacle does do is it convinces viewers that may have popped in for a sub just for the fight to never do it again with Netflix.

At least if they (Netflix) came out, apologized for the issue and offered to comp the sub for a large portion of their subscribers for the month it would have gone a very long way to put minds at ease and let people know they dropped the ball, are willing to accept that it was their fault and that they are actively trying to correct the problem for future endeavors.
 
People ditched cable because of pricing and more choices. Although cable requires additional equipment and may cost more, it's still better for sporting events.
 
The stream was fine for me. But now I understand why they were just standing there. They were waiting for the buffering to end for everyone else before they really started boxing. But with the shortened 2 minute rounds, they ran out of time and couldn't wait any longer. It all makes sense now. Nothing to do with Tyson being 58 years old..
 
What is his monetary loss? Let us pretend this guy's home was completely void of all technology and he wanted to watch this ONE event his home. After that he wouldn't use any of the equipment again.

Internet Installation 50.00
Internet for 1 month 100.00
WiFi Router 50.00
TV 300.00
Netflix Premium for 1 month 24.00
Total Cost $524.00

You think a reputable lawyer is going to file a lawsuit for $600???
The Court costs alone would be a couple of thousand.


Or are you going to claim he experienced mental distress???

I think that's the reason why they are trying to launch a class-action lawsuit.
 
Seems to me that the ones who should be suing are those who wasted their time by actually watching this debacle.
 
So this event was a mixed bag? Ok, but who won? Tyson? Paul? Netflix?
I watched the fight night on netflix. I had about 5 minutes of downtime before it returned (during the ladies fight). Thats just me, I was streaming on pc and on my tv. Interesting enough, my TV was about 5 minutes behind my PC.

I would say the fights up to the Tyson vs Paul match were worth watching. The night required nothing more from me than to stay home on a Friday night and watch on my already paid for netflix subscription. There were no extra fee's, I didnt need to go to a bar or anything.

Im not a huge boxing fan but having it on in the background while I was playing games helped make an entertaining night that had no additional cost to it.

Id say kudos to Netflix.
 
What is his monetary loss? Let us pretend this guy's home was completely void of all technology and he wanted to watch this ONE event his home. After that he wouldn't use any of the equipment again.

Internet Installation 50.00
Internet for 1 month 100.00
WiFi Router 50.00
TV 300.00
Netflix Premium for 1 month 24.00
Total Cost $524.00

You think a reputable lawyer is going to file a lawsuit for $600???
The Court costs alone would be a couple of thousand.


Or are you going to claim he experienced mental distress???
Does any of that matter? Netflix is not offering refunds to those affected, as such, those who paid for access to the event were effectively unable to access said event. So their claim is legitimate. Netflix was caught off guard but that does not negate their responsibility to deliver on the offer promised or issue refunds.
 
Lol suing them, for what, max of $25.24 or something? Stupid people gonna be stupid...
So what you're really saying with that statement is that you don't understand the context of this problem. That's ok, not everyone can "get it".
 
Back