Al Jazeera is one source I read on a daily basis, for the very reason you mention -- I've seen nothing in their reporting to contradict my statements.
In your opinion.
And the people of both countries have rejoiced to throw off the yoke of those oppressive regimes.
Nope, they are throwing a fit and designating a company a supply chain risk! The govt /military does not need to do business with a particular vendor but why designate them a supply chain risk? Just go with another vendor and lay the matter to rest.
The following article gives the time line. The parts covering the 24th Feb to the 28th shows that the discussions were still going on when the bombing of Tehran took place.
and in the opinion of the International Court of Justice, Amnesty International, Al Jazeera and most European countries. The German government didn't agree it was genocide but then it has strong business ties with Israel however 60% of the German people strongly felt it was genocide.
In Venezuela, the opposition leader María Corina Machado has pushed for democracy in her country and was widely supported. Trump ignored her, then called Venezuela a "US Protectorate" before placing his own candidate in charge (one that will give Venezuelan oil to America). Maybe that's democracy to you but I'm fairly sure your founding fathers are turning in their graves.
No, you failed to read your own link. The world 'concludes' is rather conclusive. The statements made by Oman's FM on the 27th were in regards to the concluded talks.
Now you're not simply wrong, but outright lying. Venezuela is currently being led by Delcy Rodriguez, Maduro's Vice President. And Maria Corina Machado wasn't "ignored" by Trump -- she was in fact so ecstatic over Trump's actions that she gave her own Nobel Peace Prize to him, saying he had accomplished more for Venezuelan democracy than anyone:
www.bbc.com
It's a simple question with a simple answer. Military vendors must be able to reliably deliver products and services. If Anthropic doesn't allow its products to support certain military operations, these vendors cannot perform their role. Had the federal government "been throwing a fit", they'd have banned Anthropic from the entire government supply chain, not simply the military.
I think you altered that quote by changing the comma into a full stop. The full sentence was:
I don't lie and it's quite poor that you accuse others of such things.
The US -- and the rest of the world -- has had these talks with Iran for more than 25 years, with the same result. Whatever Iran agrees to, they still continue their nuclear weapons program.
You say that, then repeat this lie again. Trump didn't "replace" Machado, nor has Trump "placed in charge" of Venezuela anyone. Maduro's second-in-command runs Venezuela at present.
www.pbs.org
Every time I spend the time proving why your points are incorrect you just ignore things and come up with another crazy justification for this war. So far I've covered:The US -- and the rest of the world -- has had these talks with Iran for more than 25 years, with the same result. Whatever Iran agrees to, they still continue their nuclear weapons program.
It's been widely reported that this round of talks concluded with Iran refusing to give up its enrichment facilities (despite being offered nuclear fuel free forever). Iran also refused to stop progressing its ballistic missile programs and refused to stop supporting its proxy terror networks. You can only talk so long before you must take action.
You say that, then repeat this lie again. Trump didn't "replace" Machado, nor has Trump "placed in charge" of Venezuela anyone. Maduro's second-in-command runs Venezuela at present.
Who is Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela's interim president after Maduro's ouster?
Interim President Delcy Rodríguez has taken the place of her ally President Nicolás Maduro, captured by the United States in a nighttime military operation, and offered “to collaborate” with the Trump administration in what could be a seismic shift in relations between the adversary governments.
You've proven nothing; you keep repeating the absurd lie that "Trump put someone in charge" of Venezuela.
Why bring that up, when you scream bloody murder over our stopping the genocide in Iran? Here's an idea: if you - and your country - feel so strongly about Israel, grow a set and stop this purported genocide.
By your logic, since Israel has nukes, we should allow the entire world to develop them.
25 years of diplomacy failed to stop Iran's nuclear ambitions. We had three full rounds of talks just this year alone.
Tell you what. I'll bet any sum you care to wager that this turns out false. Techspot can hold the stakes. I'll even give you 2:1 odds. Deal?
Well if the DoD wants to change the contract terms after the fact then Anthropic has a right to not agree to it. DoD can just cancel the contract and move on to another vendor. There is no need to designate it a supply chain risk. Designating a company as a supply chain risk consequence is a Govt ban. They really didn't need to designate it a supply chain risk. Glad to see Anthropic has filled a lawsuit against this with briefs from Gemini lead and others in support. This govt needs to be designated a ego maniac risk for personal vendetta. They don't like it if they can't bully their way to get what they want.No, you failed to read your own link. The world 'concludes' is rather conclusive. The statements made by Oman's FM on the 27th were in regards to the concluded talks.
"February 26 – A third round of nuclear talks concludes in Geneva."
Now you're not simply wrong, but outright lying. Venezuela is currently being led by Delcy Rodriguez, Maduro's Vice President. And Maria Corina Machado wasn't "ignored" by Trump -- she was in fact so ecstatic over Trump's actions that she gave her own Nobel Peace Prize to him, saying he had accomplished more for Venezuelan democracy than anyone:
Machado presents Trump with her Nobel award at White House meeting
Trump thanked Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, calling it "a wonderful gesture of mutual respect".
It's a simple question with a simple answer. Military vendors must be able to reliably deliver products and services. If Anthropic doesn't allow its products to support certain military operations, these vendors cannot perform their role. Had the federal government "been throwing a fit", they'd have banned Anthropic from the entire government supply chain, not simply the military.
The DoD didn't change the contract terms. Contracts cannot be unilaterally altered, and if the DoD had tried, Anthropic could have sued for wrongful termination.
It's not a ban from the federal government; just for US military use. Thousands of other firms are similarly labelled a supply chain risk. To sell products and services to the US military, you must be able to reliably and predictably supply the military's needs. Anthropic has shown they refuse to do so.
So how is it a supply chain risk if the DoD can opt to just not buy their services? No one is forcing them to. Simple. They wanted to make an example and destroy their business.
It's really very simple. If a DoD contractor is dependent on Anthropic's tools and Anthropic does to them what they did to the DoD, that contractor is likely to become at least temporarily unavailable to fill their commitments. That is, in fact, the entire reason the supply-chain risk designation exists ... exactly for situations like this.
Wrong again! If they'd have wanted to destroy their business, they'd have banned the entire government from using Anthropic products.
www.bbc.co.uk
time.com
The genocide that Israel committed was in Palestine and it was for this that Netanyahu has been branded a war criminal by the International court of Justice. He will be arrested if he steps foot in any civilised country.
I guess you guys got bored before the following weeks concluding talks and just bombed and killed them, their religious leader and a girls school. Do you think they'll ever come to the table again?
Your comment was regards me thinking that Israel and America might not win this war. I honestly doubt that TS holds bets but first you have to state what constitutes a win for either side in this war. If we're to believe Trump and Hegseth then they say this isn't even a war and also that they've already won.
Do you even read links before posting them? Delcy Rodriguez was Maduro's Vice President: she assumed power when Maduro was removed. In what alternate universe do you believe Trump "placed her in power"?
Who cares? They no longer have a military, much less a nuclear program. BTW, the facts have since surfaced about those "talks" you claim were working so well:
So you believe Iran might respond as did the US did after Pearl Harbor: convert to a war footing, destroy the US navy and invades our shores? Are these the fantasies you concern yourself with late at night?
They're "Shahed" drones, and we've already shot down several with anti-aircraft fire (at a net cost of $500 a kill), and Israel's rumored to have killed one with Iron Beam, at a cost of about $2 in electric power.
It's not difficult to see who are the bad guys here. In the past 2 years Israel has sent parcel bombs (via pagers) to all the individual members of the government of a neighbouring country. You've committed genocide in Gaza. You've set up 270 illegal settlements in Palestine then moved in half a million Jewish settlers despite repeatedly being told to leave by the International Court of Justice. You bombed the government of Iran during the middle of peace talks and then killed their spiritual leader. You also obliterated a girls nursery school in Tehran killing 170 children. It's no small wonder your own leader has also been labelled a war criminal.
Why lie? Israel didn't "send" pagers to anyone. Nor were they sent to "members of the government". Hezbollah is identified as a terrorist organization by the entire Western world. Stop defending them.
The "peace" talks failed, as I demonstrated above. Iran refused to give up its nuclear weapons programme. FAFO.
Not by anyone with the IQ above that of a boiled turnip.
I don't think we're getting anywhere. I'll even let you have the last word. Keep safe in your bomb shelter.
Thanks; you're a better man than I. I'll reserve a bunk for you in the shelter ... just bring your own iodine pills.
