Anthropic just lost another round in its fight with the Pentagon

midian182

Posts: 11,747   +178
Staff member
What just happened? Anthropic has suffered another setback in its escalating fight with the Pentagon. A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., has refused to temporarily block the Defense Department from treating the AI firm as a supply chain risk while the case continues.

The ruling keeps Anthropic locked out of DoD contracts for now, even though a separate federal court in California recently barred the Trump administration from enforcing a broader ban on the use of Claude.

The split decisions leave Anthropic in an awkward position. It's still able to work with other government agencies, but effectively frozen out of Pentagon-related business.

In its decision, the appeals court said the balance of harms favored the government. Judges described Anthropic's risk as primarily financial, while casting the Pentagon's position as part of wartime procurement during an active military conflict.

Also read: Anthropic unveils new powerful AI that finds software flaws, but says it's too dangerous to release

The panel acknowledged the company would likely suffer some irreparable harm without relief, but said Anthropic had not shown that its free speech rights were being meaningfully "chilled" while the case plays out.

The court did, however, say the matter should be expedited, suggesting the legal fight will move faster because of the damage Anthropic is likely to face in the meantime.

The dispute stems from a breakdown in negotiations between Anthropic and the Pentagon over how Claude could be used in defense settings.

Anthropic had pushed for assurances that its models would not be used for fully autonomous weapons or domestic mass surveillance, while the DoD wanted broader access across all lawful uses.

When the two sides failed to reach an agreement, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly branded the company a supply chain risk before the department formalized the designation in early March.

Defense contractors are now required to certify they are not using Anthropic's models in work tied to the military, though Claude remains available for non-DoD projects and other federal agencies. Anthropic has argued the move is retaliatory, unconstitutional, arbitrary, and procedurally unsound.

Part of the confusion comes from the government relying on two separate legal authorities to justify its actions, forcing Anthropic to challenge them in different courts. That explains how the California court could block one aspect of the administration's restrictions while the Washington appeals court allowed the Pentagon blacklist to remain in place.

Anthropic is reportedly the first American company to receive this kind of supply chain risk designation, a label more commonly associated with foreign adversaries. It's a dramatic turn of events for a company that signed a $200 million Pentagon contract last July and was once being positioned for deeper integration into the DoD's AI efforts.

Permalink to story:

 
None of these AI companies should be colluding with the US govt, if regulators were able to act, the AI bubble would've popped long ago.

BTW, it is a war by definition, no matter what the administration wants to call it. Inb4 someone calls me a crazy leftist for saying that, however my opinion is the US should stay the **** out of other countries problems, as a taxpayer our money would be better spent on fixing US infrastructure instead of bombing some third world country.
 
None of these AI companies should be colluding with the US govt, if regulators were able to act, the AI bubble would've popped long ago.

BTW, it is a war by definition, no matter what the administration wants to call it. Inb4 someone calls me a crazy leftist for saying that, however my opinion is the US should stay the **** out of other countries problems, as a taxpayer our money would be better spent on fixing US infrastructure instead of bombing some third world country.
US tried that before - WW2 began with them staying neutral…. Imagine a world where the US had stayed that way… Stalin and/or Hitler ruling the world… yikes…

Like it or not, the US is the most powerful nation on the planet - and they enjoy the fruits of this with lower prices than other nations, more access / first access to new tech, etc, etc…

But, those who’ve seen Spiderman know - with great power comes great responsibility. If the US ignores the rest of the world, that power disappears - as do the privileges associated with it. You think $4 a gallon for gasoline is bad? Try doubling it… or tripling…

The US government understands this - and attempts to shield their citizens from the moral cost of “doing business”… but if you want to be #1, you’ve got to get your hands dirty.

By the way, if you think Iran is a “third world country”, perhaps you might want to do a bit of research?
 
Anthropic is reportedly the first American company to receive this kind of supply chain risk
Yes, because Anthropic is the first American company to tell the US military it can't use its products for military purposes.

By the way, if you think Iran is a “third world country”, perhaps you might want to do a bit of research?
While I agree with your other points, historically Iran is indeed 'third world': neither NATO nor Warsaw-Pact aligned. By the more modern usage of "undeveloped", Iran's per-capita GDP is in line with the Philippines, Bolivia, and Uzbekistan, which makes even more abhorrent their devoting billions in revenues to their nuclear ICBM program.
 
Anthropic did something monumentally stupid.

They could have bragged for years about their models being used in crushing Iran.

"Claude - the model that squashed a loony dictatorship. From $19.99 / mo"
The marketing potential of that is colossal. Instead of using it and being proud, they decided to attempt to put the government under corporate control - which indeed failed and Anthropic was punished, but too lightly. The ban should have been a lot harsher.
 
Yes, because Anthropic is the first American company to tell the US military it can't use its products for military purposes.

While I agree with your other points, historically Iran is indeed 'third world': neither NATO nor Warsaw-Pact aligned. By the more modern usage of "undeveloped", Iran's per-capita GDP is in line with the Philippines, Bolivia, and Uzbekistan, which makes even more abhorrent their devoting billions in revenues to their nuclear ICBM program.

I guess it has to do with your values. While Iran doesn't have a robust economy and the people live much simpler lives, I'm not sure there are a ton of "third world countries' that have an ICBM program, nuclear programs with weapons development, and advanced drones and cluster rockets. China and Russia have been supplying their technology to a great degree.
 
Back