Bluesky rolls out dislike feature as user base reaches 40 million

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 1,998   +58
Staff
The big picture: The addition of dislikes and social neighborhood mapping underscores Bluesky's continuing effort to balance personalization, community engagement, and moderation. As user activity increases and critical feedback influences product development, the company's success may depend on how effectively these systems deliver a sense of meaningful control to its users.

Bluesky recently reached a major milestone, announcing that it now serves 40 million users worldwide. Alongside this achievement, the platform unveiled a series of updates aimed at shaping its digital environment – most notably, the introduction of a Dislike feature designed to improve content personalization across its Discover feed and other areas.

At its core, the new Dislike option functions as a private user tool, allowing people to indicate the types of content they prefer to see less of. Bluesky's engineering team will use these signals to fine-tune the ranking of posts and replies, tailoring recommendations to individual activity and interests.

While the platform's technical roadmap already emphasizes decentralized moderation – enabling users to create and apply their own blocking, muting, and filtering rules – these updates represent a deeper investment in automated personalization.

We really are anti torment nexus. You can't get rid of all the torment but, you know, you gotta put in some hours to fight it

[image or embed]

– Paul Frazee (@pfrazee.com) October 31, 2025 at 3:12 PM

Bluesky says that dislikes aren't just another engagement metric but a key part of a broader ranking overhaul. As users indicate their content preferences, the platform's new "social neighborhood" mapping system will use this feedback to prioritize posts and replies from accounts more relevant to each user's interests and social circles.

On rival platforms like Threads, algorithmic feed ranking has often led to user frustration, with unrelated or contextless content surfacing in timelines, a problem Bluesky hopes to solve through more granular controls and localized conversation mapping.

Beyond dislikes, Bluesky's latest slate of updates focuses on conversation quality and moderation. A new reply-detection model is being used to identify and downrank responses deemed toxic, spammy, off-topic, or posted in bad faith. Instead of removing problematic posts outright, Bluesky's approach is to make them less visible by adjusting their placement in threads, search results, and notifications.

The platform is also testing an updated Reply button: users are now taken to the full thread before composing a response, a change intended to reduce fragmented or redundant replies.

Amid an ongoing debate over platform-level moderation, Bluesky has faced criticism for its restrained approach to banning accounts. Some users have expressed frustration with its reluctance to remove profiles accused of violating community rules directly.

In contrast to centralized content policing, Bluesky's leadership argues that user-directed tools such as moderation lists, muted word filters, and customizable notification controls are more effective in fostering a balanced, self-managed experience. Still, the company acknowledges that such strategies may reinforce "filter bubbles," limiting exposure to dissenting viewpoints and reducing opportunities for constructive dialogue.

Permalink to story:

 
Why are all of these platforms so allergic to just giving users an edit button? No one on Bluesky asked for this, but everyone asked for an edit button.
 
Why are all of these platforms so allergic to just giving users an edit button? No one on Bluesky asked for this, but everyone asked for an edit button.
What!? This was sounding interesting until I saw no edit. That is just stupid. Put a time limit on it, sure, but everyone is happier with edit. I can check a post 3 times and then hit submit and instantly see 4 typos.
 
What!? This was sounding interesting until I saw no edit. That is just stupid. Put a time limit on it, sure, but everyone is happier with edit. I can check a post 3 times and then hit submit and instantly see 4 typos.

Exactly! I get the concern about someone like putting up a post that says something and then changing it later to like hate speech just to troll, but put a time limit on it or only allow one edit and if someone gets too many validated reports about doing troll edits like that, then take it away from that user. How hard is that?!
 
Why are all of these platforms so allergic to just giving users an edit button? No one on Bluesky asked for this, but everyone asked for an edit button.
These platforms are universally created by politically charged individuals who use these platforms as therapy chambers to hear their own echo. Bluesky was created because pre Musk twitter wasnt ban happy enough (lol).

Simple logical actions are not found here.
 
Usually, platforms go the opposite way. They start with dislike option and then begin to hide/remove it.
And I am sure there are financial reasons to do so. For example, horrible content from big corporations hurts when people downvote it before they even release it.

But to start without dislikes to then add it later, idk what the thinking behind it is.
 
Whilst admittedly being an old man,and thus not really up-to-speed on social platforms or whatever -from what I can glean, isn't Bluesky the sort of platform that should have an "I'm offended" button???
 
What was the selling point of Bluesky? They promise to censor republicans if they dare challenge anything said on there?

No wonder they only have 40 million members. And I bet those members aren't active. I joined Bluesky when it came out, haven't been on since. Admittedly I also haven't been on X but I do have the X app on my phone. I haven't downloaded Bluesky and I highly doubt I will.

If you have a life, you probably dont have time for these apps.
 
What was the selling point of Bluesky? They promise to censor republicans if they dare challenge anything said on there?

No wonder they only have 40 million members. And I bet those members aren't active. I joined Bluesky when it came out, haven't been on since. Admittedly I also haven't been on X but I do have the X app on my phone. I haven't downloaded Bluesky and I highly doubt I will.

If you have a life, you probably don't have time for these apps.
It is literally a leftist lounge. I spent few months on it out of curiosity. This platform will never have real diversity--diversity of thoughts and ideas.
 
Whilst admittedly being an old man,and thus not really up-to-speed on social platforms or whatever -from what I can glean, isn't Bluesky the sort of platform that should have an "I'm offended" button???
Only if you follow that segment of it, which was just Twitter before Musk took over. I don't follow anyone from the perpetually offended crowd and I never see any of that stuff. Whereas on Twitter, I couldn't avoid it because it's algorithm constantly tries to feed you engagement bait.
 
Back