Broadcom makes its "best and final offer" for Qualcomm

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,833   +202
Staff member

Broadcom isn’t giving up on its bid to purchase rival chipmaker Qualcomm. The company’s first offer in November – $60 per share in cash and $10 per share in Broadcom stock – wasn’t enough to get Qualcomm excited.

In fact, Qualcomm’s board concluded that the offer dramatically undervalued the company and presented significant regulatory uncertainty. Perhaps more money will change their mind?

In a revised takeover bid presented on Monday, Broadcom increased the amount of stock on offer to $22. That pushes the deal’s value from around $105 billion to more than $121 billion. Broadcom labeled it as its “best and final offer.”

Daniel Ives, an analyst with GBH Insights, said Qualcomm and its board now have a tough decision as this is a compelling offer in their opinion.

To further sweeten the deal and address regulatory concerns, Broadcom said it would be willing to increase the cash portion of the deal if the sale was not completed within a year of agreeing to terms. Broadcom also agreed to pay Qualcomm a significant “reverse termination fee” like the one AT&T paid T-Mobile should regulators block the buyout. According to CNBC, the break-up fee could be as high as $10 billion.

Qualcomm is reviewing the offer and said it would have no further comment on the matter until its board has completed the review.

Broadcom’s share value is up less than one percent while Qualcomm’s stock has dipped 3.83 percent on the news as of writing.

Permalink to story.

 
A few less cable companies? Ahemmmmm ...... and what is the downside?
Less competition is harmful for the clients and the economy in general. That's part of the reasons why this things are so heavily regulated.

Case study: My area has been exclusively the domain of Charter Communications re: high speed internet for years. They charge over $120/mo for 100Mbps internet.

AT&T recently got approved to deploy cables throughout the area. They're offering 100Mbps internet for $50 and gigabit fiber for $80.

Fewer cable companies = monopoly pricing. More cable companies = more speed, smaller bills.
 
A few less cable companies? Ahemmmmm ...... and what is the downside?
Less competition is harmful for the clients and the economy in general. That's part of the reasons why this things are so heavily regulated.

Case study: My area has been exclusively the domain of Charter Communications re: high speed internet for years. They charge over $120/mo for 100Mbps internet.

AT&T recently got approved to deploy cables throughout the area. They're offering 100Mbps internet for $50 and gigabit fiber for $80.

Fewer cable companies = monopoly pricing. More cable companies = more speed, smaller bills.
wow I pay $70 a month for 100Mb/s from charter, your getting screwed.
 
A few less cable companies? Ahemmmmm ...... and what is the downside?
Less competition is harmful for the clients and the economy in general. That's part of the reasons why this things are so heavily regulated.

Case study: My area has been exclusively the domain of Charter Communications re: high speed internet for years. They charge over $120/mo for 100Mbps internet.

AT&T recently got approved to deploy cables throughout the area. They're offering 100Mbps internet for $50 and gigabit fiber for $80.

Fewer cable companies = monopoly pricing. More cable companies = more speed, smaller bills.
wow I pay $70 a month for 100Mb/s from charter, your getting screwed.

I pay $80 for gig internet and live in a ruralish type area. You all are getting screwed.
 
And that's why everyone is happy to see ATT digging up their front yards to install fiber lines.
I just find it surprising that charter would have a double price difference in different regions. That's just internet right? No t.v and phone added on as well? I mean that's insane, Charter has no competition in my area at all, closest competitor speed wise is centurylink which offers 10Mb/s to most of it's city customers with some new line areas and others that got upgraded last year being able to get 25Mb/s, so at best 1/4 of charter's new speed.
 
Wow what prices, finally an advantage for living in a poor country :D We pay around 10 USD for a 1Gb/s fiber connection

It isn't an advantage if it constitutes a higher percentage of your (country's) average and/or median annual income.
 
Back