Canonical releases Ubuntu 11.04

By Emil · 23 replies
Apr 29, 2011
Post New Reply
  1. Canonical has announced Ubuntu 11.04 (codenamed Natty Narwhal). The company says the new version "continues Ubuntu's proud tradition of integrating the latest and greatest open source technologies into a high-quality, easy-to-use Linux distribution." You can download Ubuntu 11.04 directly in three flavors: Ubuntu 32-bit, Ubuntu 64-bit, and Ubuntu Server.

    Read the whole story
  2. Leeky

    Leeky TS Evangelist Posts: 3,797   +117

    I'll have to get this downloaded and trialled in VBox. I do have to say though, that I felt the design was far from perfect when used for the previous netbook edition releases. I'd like to see if its improved though.

    Doesn't this new Unity release actually fully utilise Wayland instead of as has been the way since year dot.

    Will do a new how-to guide when I get my assignments out of the way.
  3. lawfer

    lawfer TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,270   +91

    Nah, Unity still uses X.

    And I like the UI, but it feels unfinished.
  4. Xclusiveitalian

    Xclusiveitalian TS Evangelist Posts: 714   +75

    I had the 11.04 beta going, do i have to reinstall the new version or can i update it using update manager?
  5. lawfer

    lawfer TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,270   +91

    Yes, update manager will download the necesary files to update you to the final release. Make sure to update your repositories, just in case (specially if you have custom installations [beta/third-party software]).
  6. I see why no one adopts linux. Just when you get used to it, they completely change it--every 6 months.
  7. Emil

    Emil TS Rookie Topic Starter Posts: 154

    I always recommend a clean install when going from beta to final for an OS.
  8. captaincranky

    captaincranky TechSpot Addict Posts: 12,967   +2,524

    OK, it's time for a stupid question, and I'm as good a person as any to ask it..... Does Ubuntu now have native drivers supporting AHCI (SATA). Because last time I tried it, I spent 30 minutes trying (unsuccessfully) to explain to it that I'd like to run my SATA drive as IDE. It just kept asking fo SATA drivers. Huge turn off. Forget which distro though. Maybe it was 7 or 8.
  9. javierkaiser

    javierkaiser TS Enthusiast Posts: 25   +6

    Actually, im using it on a (nvidia) Raid 0, 2 satas, and no problems with sata drivers...
  10. matrix86

    matrix86 TS Guru Posts: 843   +38

    I'm not a real big fan of linux, but I may actually dual boot with this version on my netbook. Linux has always been a pain for me and never could learn it and adapt to it as fast as I could on Windows. But this one looks like it might be easier to use and fun to play around with.
  11. PinothyJ

    PinothyJ TS Guru Posts: 460   +22

    What's that? A Guest is posting a provocative comment!? NO WAY!

  12. Leeky

    Leeky TS Evangelist Posts: 3,797   +117

    You should be good to go Captain. :)

    You could always download Virtualbox, or VMware player or something, and install it as a Guest OS to try it.

    Sounds like its pretty much going to behave and act the same as the previous netbook editions did then, just with other optimisations.

    I understand your reasons for suggesting that in the case of Windows, but I'm curious for your reasons for needing to do it in this scenario.

    In my opinion all that should be needed to move from beta to official release is:

    sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
    Then a cup of tea while it works away. :D
  13. ElShotte

    ElShotte TS Booster Posts: 163

    Am I missing something? Where's the Edit button for the comment? Anyway, what I was going to say is that the easier thing to do, if you have a spare 2Gb or bigger Flash Drive, just use it to do a Live boot. I believe there's guides right on the Ubuntu download page, and it's actually quite simple. Plug the flash in, run the software, select ISO, click Ok then wait.
  14. Leeky

    Leeky TS Evangelist Posts: 3,797   +117

    Have sorted it for you.

    Thanks for the tip - I am aware of it, I use that exact method to install Linux on systems when required. I tend to trial others in VBox though, as I'm quite happy sticking to Debian (Squeeze) with XFCE as my DE.

    Its a good tip for those wishing to try it whilst keeping Windows though! :)
  15. matrix86

    matrix86 TS Guru Posts: 843   +38

    In order to use edit, you'll have to access this story from the forums. This keeps those pesky guests from changing what they say just so they'll stop being called stupid from us calling them stupid for the stupid comments they make, lol.
  16. lawfer

    lawfer TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,270   +91

    That's completely unnecessary on a linux distro. This is not Windows.
  17. "I see why no one adopts linux. Just when you get used to it, they completely change it--every 6 months."

    Another reason why no-one adopts Linux: It's sh*t.
  18. neonxy

    neonxy TS Rookie

    Till the time games depend on direct X, there won't be major Linux adaptation at least not desktop market. It's not fault of Linux, companies like Microsoft wish to monopolize everything. You can't play Blu ray movies in Linux, can't run modern games.

    However situation is completely different in server market. Windows is still far behind in stability and scalability. 95% of world's super computers run on Linux, this itself speaks for the scalability and stability of Linux kernel.
  19. NeoNxy.. Ok, First im not going to stay 100% anonymous, but I'm not going to sign up either.

    But this is regarding your post about how Linux is more secure and stable then Windows. That is what you call an opinion. BUT, if you want to get into facts, then we can do that as well. The reason people "think" Linux is more secure, is because Linux is NOT targeted NEAR as much as windows is, when it comes to on-board attacks, this may be why people tend to believe that Linux is the superior when it comes to security and stability. Once again, this is also just an opinion. but for someone to take their opinion, and try to factualize it, is completely immature.

    Ubuntu is a good Linux distro, but I DO NOT believe that Linux is more secure then windows. Stability? Im not sure, I dont care either. but security, windows. If Linux got attacked 1/3 as much as windows does, then we'd see Linux's TRUE security.. just my 2 cents.
  20. lawfer

    lawfer TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,270   +91

    If Linux was attacked as many times as Windows, it would still be superior regarding security. If you couldn't tell by the definition of linux, it is open-source code. That alone makes the response time to any malicious threat, I would dare to say, 10 times higher than an OS such as Windows.
  21. Jurassic4096

    Jurassic4096 Banned Posts: 155

    95% of world's super computers run on Linux, this itself speaks for the scalability and stability of Linux kernel.

    No, that just tells you Linux is good for something as long as it doesn't have to cater to thousands of people running millions of different hardware configurations. Keep Linux on servers. Leave the rest to the pros.
  22. Leave Linux on the SERVER and the REST to the "Pros"? That is a little backwards....
  23. Leeky

    Leeky TS Evangelist Posts: 3,797   +117

    Server specifications vary as much as, if not more than specfications of home computers.

    Linux is everything you just said it wasn't. :haha:
  24. I was unable to connect to wireless. The video shows like, " click wireless button and it will show you various routers". No matter what i did, i couldn't get any networks. May be it was due to my wireless card which may not be supported. Am new to linux, so i am unable to experience the power of Linux without internet. Sad.

Similar Topics

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...