Christopher Nolan believes Gen Z will push back against generative AI and its growing influence

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,687   +1,013
Staff
The Slop Rises: Despite his relatively short filmography, Christopher Nolan is now regarded as one of the most influential filmmakers of the "new" Hollywood era. Known for his outspoken views on technology and his complex storytelling, the British director, producer, and screenwriter also has some interesting thoughts on generative AI and other modern LLM-based AI systems.

Days before The Odyssey is set to debut in cinemas worldwide, director Christopher Nolan answered questions about filmmaking, technology, and generative AI.

Nolan does not own a smartphone; otherwise, he says he would be "horribly addicted" to doomscrolling. He also believes genAI has limited room to grow in today's film industry because practical effects and a more "human" approach to filmmaking are experiencing a resurgence in modern Hollywood productions.

The director of the Dark Knight trilogy, Inception, Interstellar, and Oppenheimer is particularly impressed by the reaction Gen Z is having toward AI. Younger people are rejecting genAI, chatbots, and LLMs, Nolan said, despite the unprecedented, industry-shifting financial speculation used to promote this supposedly "foundational" technological advancement.

Gen Z's "judgment of AI slop has been immediate and harsh," Nolan said, referring to his four children's attitudes toward AI. Young people "see it for what it is very quickly – and it's much easier for them to identify it because it grew out of an online world they know really well."

The director is not necessarily opposed to every aspect of LLM-based AI systems, but he believes Big Tech's obsession with turning every digital interaction into a chatbot "experience" is unlikely to succeed. Generative AI emerged at the wrong time, Nolan said, because interest in more authentic forms of storytelling is growing.

After spending years pursuing virtual environments, people are now allegedly looking to return to a more "tactile" approach to the outside world and entertainment. Nolan also believes that assumptions about young viewers' short attention spans are misguided, pointing to the fact that strangely meditative productions such as Backrooms have quickly become critical and commercial successes.

The Odyssey has a runtime of 173 minutes and is set to adapt one of the foundational works of classical literature from ancient Greece. As with his previous films, Nolan tried to use as few computer-generated effects as possible. The Cyclops sequence in the movie combined several practical "tricks" with CGI, and Nolan hopes viewers will simply enjoy "the magic of it" without focusing on the technical details behind its creation.

Nolan's approach to AI is adding fuel to the growing debate over the use of AI-generated content in movies. Earlier this year, Martin Scorsese faced criticism for appearing to "throw artists under the bus" after becoming an adviser to AI company Black Forest Labs. Meanwhile, Hellboy and Frankenstein director Guillermo del Toro said he would "rather die" than use this type of technology.

Permalink to story:

 
Gonna need a source on this. Where are you getting *most* and where are you getting *virtually all the time*?

It will only rise… people tend to think “young people” are in some way different than “average people”… they aren’t… they’re just younger… they grow up to become just like “us”…
 
Every generation is pushing back. The divisions are among class lines, not age lines.

This is a surveillance tool, coming right on the heels of social media, commercialized by exactly the same brains, inside exactly the same skulls - all of which are very wealthy.

What an asinine perspective piece.
 

It will only rise… people tend to think “young people” are in some way different than “average people”… they aren’t… they’re just younger… they grow up to become just like “us”…
So *most* is about half in some cases, and "virtually all the time* is 10%.

Gotcha.
 
Aside from businesses and shareholders, AI generated content is pretty much universally hated.
Translation: "we all consume it daily, usually unknowingly, on an ever-increasing basis, but we come here to virtue-signal against it."

Public perceptions about AI today are identical to public perception about electrification in the 1890s. How'd that one work out?
 
He's not wrong. Young ppl hate AI more than anyone else IMO. They're hyper-vigilant about it.

Oh, and that thing they have in their hands 24/7, I call it PIH syndrome (phone in hand) doesn't have
anything to do with AI? Shoot, most of the garbage they read/see is AI or AI written.
LOL, you can't watch a police chase/arrest/fight video without someone saying "I need my phone".
They aren't crack addicts...they are phone addicts.
 
"Nolan says younger generations are seeking more authentic experiences"

This from a guy who makes his money on escapist films who's newest movie is about rewriting history in a far from authentic way.

We're listening to him, why?
 
Oh, and that thing they have in their hands 24/7, I call it PIH syndrome (phone in hand) doesn't have
anything to do with AI? Shoot, most of the garbage they read/see is AI or AI written.
LOL, you can't watch a police chase/arrest/fight video without someone saying "I need my phone".
They aren't crack addicts...they are phone addicts.
Young people are not choosing to engage with AI, it's being forced on them. Beyond using it to be lazy in school, they universally hate it.
 
This from a guy [who's] newest movie is about rewriting history in a far from authentic way.
Wait, you mean Helen of Troy wasn't a Sub-Saharan African woman being fought over by transgender warriors?

Young people are not choosing to engage with AI, it's being forced on them. Beyond using it to be lazy in school, they universally hate it.
Yes, they hate it just as much as they do "inauthentic" CGI in films.
 
I have been impressed with Gen. Z many times myself.

Heavy CGI was the "slop" of yesterday. It is hard to beat special effects done in camera—why many pre-1990 films look more real than something done in the past decade. The xenomorph of Alien and Aliens will always look more convincing than his CGI brethren; the blood fountain of Johnny Depp's bed than some modern horror. Computers opened up unfathomable doorways, but also made filmmakers lazy.
 
Young people are not choosing to engage with AI, it's being forced on them. Beyond using it to be lazy in school, they universally hate it.
Nothing is being forced… they like it - as do most people… we have just been trained to say we hate new things… then we use them for a few years and wonder how we survived without them…

I remember when cell phones came out… then smartphones… so many said they hated them… yet… almost everyone has one… a few years from now, everyone will use AI and won’t even think twice about it.
 

It will only rise… people tend to think “young people” are in some way different than “average people”… they aren’t… they’re just younger… they grow up to become just like “us”…

My money is on that this person is over 40, is invested in AI companies, works for one, or owns one. Thanks random person on the internet, you sure changed my mind! /sarcasm

It will be a glorious day when the economic fallout from an oversize AI bubble bursts. I have a feeling all these boomers will be a lot of less confident after getting a swift kick in the nuts from the market fallout. 🤣
 
Always believed AI will not be for us and Gen Z. It is for the next Gen A, B,... as they will be born and raised with and by AI. We are the guinea pigs.
 
It is hard to beat special effects done in camera—why many pre-1990 films look more real than something done in the past decade. The xenomorph of Alien and Aliens will always look more convincing than his CGI brethren
You're comparing the very best of '80s special effects with the worst of today's films. But let's be fair: most of those old movies had laughably bad effects. We only notice it today if we go back and watch them ... and we rarely watch the bad ones.
 
You're comparing the very best of '80s special effects with the worst of today's films. But let's be fair: most of those old movies had laughably bad effects. We only notice it today if we go back and watch them ... and we rarely watch the bad ones.
Exactly... I love how people tell me how incredible the effects from Terminator 2 were compared to today's CGI... but Terminator 2 was arguably the best of its time... try watching Masters of the Universe (the old one) and keep thinking that... or The Last Starfighter....
 
My money is on that this person is over 40, is invested in AI companies, works for one, or owns one. Thanks random person on the internet, you sure changed my mind! /sarcasm

It will be a glorious day when the economic fallout from an oversize AI bubble bursts. I have a feeling all these boomers will be a lot of less confident after getting a swift kick in the nuts from the market fallout. 🤣
It’s 5 people… and they work for an established polling firm…

And there are plenty of similar studies you can look up if you truly believe your misguided intuition is superior to actual facts…
 
People using AI doesn't mean they have to like using AI, it's been increasingly difficult to avoid AI, especially for the average person as search engines have been enshittified to feed garbage AI results.
But leave it to the AI apologists to find some way to praise AI as usual.

AI is universally hated except for those financially involved in it, or are drinking the AI koolaid.
 
Back