After reading, and laughing at those defending scammers, I had to make two points that invalidate both "we're adding value by making sure things are available" and "these are luxury goods."
Say the market was only able to produce 100 in demand candy bars, and so it did just that. Then, say, 50% of consumers who would wish to purchase these candy bars have the income to responsibility purchase one. 25% don't have the financial income to responsibility purchase one. And then, of course, 25% have more than enough money to responsibility purchase one.
These candy bars were sold at the price allowing for the producers to make a profit. 75% are purchased by the consumer through reasonable market offerings, and 25% are purchased by "resellers", or in other words, scammers. How then can you make the argument that scammers are ensuring availability, when they in fact artificially repurposed 25% of the availability in the market AND then made it less accessible to the people most likely to purchase them.
Which leads to my next topic. I wouldn't exactly call a PS5 a luxury good. A high end, even low end, PC gaming set-up is a luxury good because that is less accessible than a PS5.
The most cost effective way to play video games is a video game console. And I would make the argument that everyone deserves the ability to enjoy their preferred leisurely/recreational activities, especially in today's world.
For people that want to game, buying an effective and functional PC set-up will run you much more than $500. As most of us know, a proper PC set-up capable of playing all games will run you a min of $800, but more likely $1,000+. And we're not even talking about a desk, chair, etc. No matter, the point stands, I don't think it's fair to claim innocence because the PS5 is a luxury good that, at it's $500 cost, is still "accessible" to most low income households.
A luxury good, to me, is something that people who can afford luxury can and will purchase.
Of course I haven't touched on the chip shortage, but this again brings my point home. The scammers hoarding and hiking up the price of a PS5, are the same as the ones hoarding and hiking up the price of the chips. With all that being said, how is it even possible to logically explain and believe that scammers are "ensuring something remains available on the market".
All this being said, I'm personally peeved because worked my *** off to get my hands on a PS5 and clearly had to fight online with hoarders to get my hands on one. And I'm one of the 25% who can purchase luxury goods but won't spend more on them simply because I believe in paying what the market priced them.