You may criticize that research on lizards and leafblowers if you wish, but I'll defer to experts in the field, experts who determined that that research was worth funding.Which is why your comment isn't germane. No one criticized studying the pharmacological benefits of Gila venom, but we did criticize wasting taxpayer dollars to blow anoles off trees.
But EVERYONE was saying we should study quantum mechanics in general. And we did.
You're spreading disinformation.
" The initial 2025 federal research and development (R&D) budget saw an aggregate increase to approximately $201.9 billion, representing a 4% rise over 2024."
Directing funds away from ultra-liberal and ultra-wasteful NIH projects into ones with far more real-world potential are what will keep America at the forefront of modern science and technology.
No, I'm not spreading disinformation. Dr. Tyson is making the claim, and he's a credible source.
The 2026 budget is lower than 2025's, NASA's science budget was halved, and the NSF and DOE both received substantial cuts. Fortunately, Congress did not agree with Trump's funding proposal which would have slashed the budgets even further. Even so, we are losing many people out of the scientific workforce, and many of them are moving abroad.
https://www.aps.org/apsnews/2026/03/federal-science-workforce-declines-trump
https://www.scientificamerican.com/...ing-lured-abroad-and-they-arent-looking-back/